Breakup fees and reverse termination fees in mergers

Breakup fees and reverse termination fees are financial provisions included in M&A agreements to allocate risk and protect the interests of the parties involved in a deal. These clauses specify the amount one party must pay the other if the transaction fails to close under certain conditions. They are negotiated early in the transaction process and can significantly influence bidder behavior, competitive dynamics, and deal certainty.

Breakup fees compensate the buyer if the seller terminates the deal.

A breakup fee—also known as a termination fee—is a pre-agreed payment that the seller must pay to the buyer if the seller backs out of the transaction for specific reasons. This typically occurs when:

• The seller accepts a competing, higher offer from another bidder (a “superior proposal”)

• The seller’s shareholders vote against the transaction

• The seller breaches deal covenants or representations in the agreement

The fee is intended to compensate the buyer for the time, resources, and opportunity costs incurred while pursuing the deal.

Trigger Event	Common Fee Range (% of deal value)
Acceptance of a superior offer	2% – 4%
Shareholder rejection	1% – 3%
Material breach of agreement	2% – 5%

A breakup fee discourages sellers from reneging on signed agreements and serves as a deterrent against last-minute deal jumping. However, courts require that fees remain reasonable and not coercive, or they risk being invalidated as penalties.

Reverse termination fees protect the seller if the buyer fails to close.

A reverse termination fee is the mirror provision—an amount paid by the buyer to the seller if the buyer cannot complete the deal. Common causes include:

• Failure to obtain financing

• Inability to secure regulatory approvals

• Shareholder rejection (in stock-for-stock deals)

• Other material breaches of buyer obligations

This fee compensates the seller for its foregone alternatives, transaction expenses, and strategic disruption. It’s particularly important in deals involving:

• Private equity buyers who rely on external debt financing

• Cross-border transactions with complex antitrust clearance

• Volatile market conditions that raise execution risk

Reverse termination fees have become more common as sellers demand protections equal to those given to buyers.

Deal certainty depends on how fees are structured and triggered.

Both fee types are designed to balance flexibility and commitment. Buyers want to avoid overcommitting when there is regulatory or financing risk. Sellers want assurance that buyers are serious and won’t walk away without consequence.

Some agreements include:

• Tiered fee structures – The fee changes based on timing or nature of the breach

• Limited grounds for termination – Sellers can’t simply walk away without triggering the fee

• Breakup fee match-rights – Buyers are given the chance to match a superior offer before the seller exits

• Reverse breakup insurance – In some cases, the fee is backed by an insurance policy or escrow

These mechanics provide negotiating leverage and help allocate risks appropriately between the parties.

Legal scrutiny requires fees to reflect reasonable damages.

Courts in the United States, particularly in Delaware, have closely examined termination fees to ensure they are not excessive or coercive. If a breakup fee is deemed too high, it can discourage competitive bidding and breach the board’s duty to maximize shareholder value.

Guidance from case law includes:

• Fees exceeding 3–4% of deal value may be considered suspect

• Boards must justify the fee as a reasonable estimate of actual harm

• Bidders cannot use high fees to deter third-party offers inappropriately

Reverse termination fees must similarly reflect actual losses and not function as a backdoor penalty for failed deals.

Reverse fees in leveraged deals require enhanced protections.

In private equity transactions where the buyer is highly leveraged, reverse termination fees are crucial. Sellers will often demand:

• Limited conditionality on financing

• Equity commitment letters from sponsors

• Specific performance provisions that allow the seller to force deal completion

• Reverse termination fees to be placed in escrow or backed by guarantees

These provisions protect sellers from execution risk and ensure private equity sponsors are held accountable even if third-party financing fails.

Negotiation of fee provisions is a critical part of M&A strategy.

Termination fees are not boilerplate. They are central to transaction strategy and can influence:

• The number of competing bids

• Willingness of a bidder to offer a premium

• How risk is priced into financing

• Shareholder confidence in deal execution

Advisors must balance these considerations to ensure that fees are fair, enforceable, and aligned with market standards. Excessive fees may scare off bidders or attract regulatory review; fees that are too low offer little recourse in a failed transaction.

Termination fees shape the behavior of all parties in the deal lifecycle.

From initial negotiation to closing, termination fees create economic consequences for walking away from a signed agreement. Whether protecting the buyer or the seller, they encourage seriousness of intent, provide legal structure to exit options, and shift the psychology of deal execution.

As dealmaking becomes more complex and competitive, the customization and importance of breakup and reverse termination fees will only continue to grow.

____________

FOLLOW US FOR MORE.

DATA STUDIOS

datastudios.org