Breakup fees and reverse termination provisions in competitive auctions
- Graziano Stefanelli
- Sep 5
- 3 min read
Breakup fees and reverse termination provisions are important components in the legal and financial architecture of competitive M&A auctions. These mechanisms define the monetary consequences if a buyer or seller fails to complete a transaction after signing a definitive agreement. By assigning financial responsibility for deal failure, both parties are incentivized to negotiate in good faith, and serious bidders gain protection against wasted resources and reputational damage. Structuring these provisions carefully can also enhance auction credibility and promote higher valuations.
Breakup fees protect sellers and encourage serious bidding.
A breakup fee (or termination fee) is paid by the seller to the original buyer if the seller accepts a superior offer or fails to close the transaction for other defined reasons. Main purposes include:
Compensating the initial buyer for lost time, expenses, and opportunity cost.
Discouraging frivolous or speculative bidding from potential interlopers.
Stabilizing auction processes so that bidders make firm offers.
Providing a clear process for “go-shop” and “no-shop” provisions, which govern the seller’s ability to seek higher bids.
Breakup fees are usually expressed as a percentage of deal value—typically between 1% and 4% in U.S. public company transactions.
Reverse termination fees manage buyer performance risk.
A reverse termination fee (RTF) is paid by the buyer to the seller if the buyer cannot complete the acquisition due to financing failure, regulatory obstacles, or other specific breaches. Key functions include:
Shifting some deal risk to the buyer, especially when financing or antitrust clearance is uncertain.
Ensuring sellers receive partial compensation for failed deals, which can damage strategic plans or share price.
Incentivizing buyers to secure robust funding commitments and regulatory approvals before signing.
Allowing for negotiation of higher bid prices in exchange for increased deal certainty.
Reverse termination fees have grown more common in private equity and cross-border transactions, where execution risk is higher.
Typical structures and negotiation points for termination provisions.
Negotiations focus on balancing the size of fees, trigger events, and the parties’ ability to walk away without excessive penalty.
Benefits and strategic uses of breakup and reverse termination fees.
Help sellers maintain leverage in competitive auctions by filtering unserious bidders.
Encourage buyers to proceed only if they can deliver on their financing and regulatory promises.
Support higher valuations by creating a sense of deal certainty among all parties.
Facilitate complex cross-border or regulatory-intensive deals where execution risk is significant.
Well-calibrated fee structures promote disciplined bidding and stable outcomes for both buyers and sellers.
Regulatory and judicial perspectives on termination provisions.
Courts and regulators review breakup and reverse termination fees for reasonableness and market conformity. Factors considered include:
Proportionality of fee size to overall deal value.
Impact on competitive bidding—excessive fees may “chill” rival offers and harm shareholder interests.
Compliance with fiduciary duties and best execution requirements for public company boards.
Transparency and disclosure to all stakeholders throughout the auction process.
Challenged or excessive fees can be struck down if deemed coercive or contrary to shareholder value.
Examples of breakup and reverse termination fees in M&A.
The AbbVie–Shire deal (2014) featured a $1.6 billion breakup fee after U.S. tax rule changes derailed the transaction.
Kraft Heinz’s bid for Unilever (2017) included significant breakup protections, encouraging a serious and expedited process.
AT&T–T-Mobile USA merger (2011) required AT&T to pay a $4 billion reverse termination fee when antitrust clearance was not obtained.
These cases show how fee structures protect both buyers and sellers from unanticipated risks and costs.
Well-structured termination provisions strengthen auction outcomes.
Breakup fees and reverse termination fees help stabilize auction dynamics, allocate deal risk, and provide incentives for both sides to close transactions. Carefully negotiated terms support competitive bidding, facilitate execution certainty, and guard against unexpected disruptions, making them a standard feature of modern M&A dealmaking.
____________
FOLLOW US FOR MORE.
DATA STUDIOS
