Capital Structure Optimization and Target Leverage
- Graziano Stefanelli
- May 4
- 3 min read

✦ Optimizing capital structure means selecting the mix of debt and equity that delivers the lowest weighted-average cost of capital (WACC) and therefore the highest enterprise value.
✦ The classic trade-off framework balances the tax shield of debt against expected distress and agency costs to pinpoint the debt ratio where marginal benefits equal marginal costs.
✦ Target leverage is usually expressed as a range—say 35 %-45 % debt-to-total-capital or 2.5×-3.0× net-debt-to-EBITDA—and is calibrated with peer benchmarks, credit ratings, cash-flow cyclicality, and legal limits.
✦ Ongoing monitoring ties dividends, buybacks, hedging, and refinancing to the target, while transparent disclosures keep boards, lenders, and investors aligned.
We’ll look at how to determine and maintain a leverage range that maximises firm value, using the trade-off model, WACC analysis, a worked example, and practical governance tools.
1. Capital Structure Basics
✦ Capital structure combines interest-bearing debt and shareholders’ equity used to finance company assets.
✦ Leverage boosts return on equity by substituting lower-cost, tax-deductible debt for higher-cost equity—until financial-distress risk starts to outweigh the tax benefit.
✦ The “optimal” mix is the point where the firm’s WACC reaches its minimum and enterprise value peaks.
2. Theory in the Real World
✦ Trade-off theory: Add debt until the extra tax shield is exactly offset by expected distress and agency costs.
✦ Pecking-order theory: Managers prefer internal funds, then debt, and issue equity only as a last resort; helpful for short-term financing decisions but less useful for setting a long-run target.
✦ Market timing: Firms issue equity when valuations are high and repurchase shares when valuations dip, explaining temporary deviations from the long-run target.
These ideas lead most companies to adopt a target range instead of a single leverage number.
3. Step-by-Step Measurement
Project free cash flow (FCF) for at least five years.
Model leverage scenarios—for example 0 %, 20 %, 40 %, and 60 % debt-to-value.
Estimate after-tax cost of debt for each scenario by adding credit spreads implied by synthetic ratings (AAA, BBB, BB, etc.).
Estimate cost of equity with the levered CAPM:
Cost of equity = risk-free rate + leveraged beta × market risk premium
Compute leveraged beta from unlevered beta using the Hamada adjustment.
Calculate WACC for each structure:
WACC = (weight of debt × cost of debt × (1 − tax rate)) + (weight of equity × cost of equity)
Identify the minimum WACC; the corresponding debt ratio is the target leverage.
4. Worked Example — Where WACC Bottoms Out
Assumptions
Risk-free rate: 3 %
Market risk premium: 6 %
Tax rate: 25 %
Unlevered beta: 0.8
Free cash flow: $50 million perpetuity (no growth)
Debt-to-Value | Leveraged beta | After-tax cost of debt | Cost of equity | WACC |
0 % | 0.80 | — | 7.8 % | 7.8 % |
20 % | 0.93 | 3.8 % | 8.4 % | 7.3 % |
40 % | 1.13 | 4.4 % | 9.1 % | 7.0 % |
60 % | 1.47 | 5.3 % | 10.3 % | 7.2 % |
At 40 % debt-to-value, WACC bottoms at 7.0 %, yielding an enterprise value of $50 million ÷ 0.07 = $714 million. Moving to 60 % leverage raises WACC—and lowers value—despite extra tax shield, confirming that 40 % lies near the optimal range.
5. Practical Calibration
✦ Peer and rating benchmarks: Compare debt ratios and interest-coverage medians for close competitors and the desired credit rating.
✦ Cash-flow volatility: Highly cyclical firms carry lower leverage to preserve covenant headroom; regulated utilities can hold more.
✦ Asset tangibility: Collateral-rich businesses (real estate, infrastructure) support more debt at tighter spreads.
✦ Tax and legal limits: Thin-capitalisation rules and interest-deduction caps may constrain the usable tax shield.
6. Maintaining the Target
✦ Link dividends, share buybacks, and growth capex to staying within the target range.
✦ Use treasury dashboards to track net-debt-to-EBITDA, interest coverage, maturity walls, and liquidity headroom each month.
✦ Keep committed revolvers and stagger debt maturities to survive credit shocks.
✦ Board oversight: Review leverage policy annually and address breaches or rating downgrades promptly.
7. Communication and Governance
✦ Publish the target leverage range and rationale in investor decks and offering memoranda.
✦ Disclose key credit metrics, covenant levels, and liquidity sources each reporting cycle.
✦ Align management incentives—for example, through economic-value-added hurdles—with preserving a value-optimal leverage mix.




