ChatGPT vs Microsoft Copilot for Data Analysis: Full Report and Comparison

OpenAI’s ChatGPT-4o – the default, most advanced ChatGPT model as of mid-2025 – and Microsoft’s family of Copilot AI assistants both offer powerful capabilities for data analysis. ChatGPT-4o (built on the GPT-4 architecture, including variants like GPT-4-turbo) is a general-purpose conversational AI known for complex reasoning, coding assistance, and even multimodal input handling.

Microsoft’s Copilot, by contrast, is not a single product but a suite of integrated AI features across platforms (Excel, Power BI, GitHub, Office apps, etc.) designed to act as “AI copilots” within users’ workflows. This report provides a deep comparative analysis of ChatGPT-4o and the Microsoft Copilot tools with a focus on data analysis, covering their supported analysis types, target users, integrations, performance, features, pricing, and each solution’s strengths and weaknesses.

Overview of ChatGPT-4o and Microsoft Copilot Tools

ChatGPT-4o is OpenAI’s flagship conversational model (an evolution of GPT-4) accessible via the ChatGPT interface or API. It excels at understanding natural language prompts and producing detailed, context-aware responses. Users can engage ChatGPT-4o in dialogue to generate code, analyze information, create content, or answer questions. Notably, ChatGPT-4o can run in specialized modes like Advanced Data Analysis (formerly “Code Interpreter”), which lets it write and execute Python code during a chat session for analytical tasks. OpenAI continually updates the model family – for example, GPT-4-turbo versions offer faster responses and larger context windows, and a research preview GPT-4.5 emphasizes factual accuracy (as of mid-2025). All these model variants are available through ChatGPT Plus or Enterprise plans, making ChatGPT a flexible general tool for many types of data analysis.

Microsoft Copilot refers to the AI assistant capabilities embedded in various Microsoft products. Rather than one monolithic AI, it consists of multiple copilots tailored to different applications but all powered by advanced GPT-4-based language models (hosted via Azure OpenAI Service). Key implementations relevant to data analysis include...

• Microsoft 365 Copilot (sometimes called Copilot for Microsoft 365): This is an AI assistant across Office apps like Excel, Word, PowerPoint, Outlook, and Teams. It leverages the user’s business data (Microsoft Graph) plus GPT-4 to help generate documents, analyze data, or summarize information in context. Within Excel, for example, Copilot can analyze spreadsheet data or create formulas on command. In Teams and Outlook, it can summarize meetings or draft emails. Microsoft 365 Copilot provides enterprise-grade security (data stays within the tenant) and uses organizational context (“grounding”) to reduce hallucinations.

• Copilot in Excel: An Excel-integrated AI assistant (part of M365 Copilot) specifically aimed at simplifying spreadsheet data analysis. It supports natural language queries to describe calculations or insights, and it can generate formulas, create charts, highlight trends, and even use Python for advanced analytics (more on this below).

• Copilot in Power BI: An assistant in Power BI (Microsoft’s business intelligence platform) that helps users build reports and interrogate data using natural language. Copilot can create visuals and dashboards based on plain English questions, write or explain DAX measures, and generate narrative insights about trends and anomalies. It aims to enable business users to develop BI reports without deep technical knowledge.

• GitHub Copilot: An AI pair-programmer originally for code completion in VS Code and other IDEs. It suggests code snippets or entire functions as developers type, and has an optional chat mode (Copilot Chat) for Q&A about code. GitHub Copilot is optimized for coding (it was trained on open-source code), and while not specific to “data analysis,” it’s heavily used by developers and data scientists to accelerate coding tasks (including data processing scripts, analysis in notebooks, etc.). By 2025, GitHub Copilot supports multiple underlying models (with higher tiers offering GPT-4 for more advanced prompts) and integrates into editors like VS Code, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, and even Jupyter notebooks.

• Microsoft 365 Copilot – Analyst and other Agents: Microsoft is expanding Copilot with specialized agents. For instance, the Analyst agent in Excel focuses on “data-heavy tasks” by leveraging Python and advanced reasoning for deep analyses. It can do things like forecast trends, detect anomalies in financials, simulate scenarios, and even show the underlying code it runs for transparency. There is also a Researcher agent for gathering information (useful in Word/Teams). These agents, discovered via an “Agent Store,” highlight how Microsoft 365 Copilot is evolving to cover more complex workflows.

So we can say that ChatGPT-4o is a standalone AI assistant that users interact with through conversation (plus optional plugins/tools), while Microsoft’s Copilot is a collection of embedded AI assistants within widely used software. Next, we compare their capabilities specifically for data analysis tasks.

Types of Data Analysis Supported

Data analysis can encompass a range of activities – from business intelligence reporting to statistical modeling and machine learning. Both ChatGPT-4o and Microsoft’s Copilot tools support these, but in differing ways. Below we break down how each handles major categories of data analysis:

Business Intelligence (BI) and Reporting

Business intelligence involves exploring business data and creating reports or dashboards (often with charts, summaries, and trends).

• ChatGPT-4o: ChatGPT can assist in BI tasks mostly through its natural language understanding and general knowledge. It can’t directly interface with a live database or BI system out-of-the-box, but it can help analysts interpret results or even generate code for queries. For example, a user can ask ChatGPT to write an SQL query or a Power BI DAX formula to retrieve certain data, or request advice on how to visualize a particular dataset. ChatGPT can also summarize a given data table or explain what a chart indicates if the data is provided in the prompt. Using the Advanced Data Analysis mode, a user could upload exports of data (CSV/Excel) and ask ChatGPT to generate visualizations or summary statistics. In that mode, ChatGPT will execute code to produce charts and stats, essentially acting like a self-service BI tool for a single user. However, ChatGPT is not connected to enterprise data sources by default – the user must supply the data or use an API integration. This makes ChatGPT more of an on-demand analyst or BI consultant that you converse with, rather than a live dashboarding tool. It’s highly flexible (it can answer conceptual questions or suggest KPIs to track), but any organizational BI content needs to be provided to it due to privacy and connectivity limitations.

• Microsoft Copilot (Power BI & Excel): Copilot shines when it comes to integrated BI analysis. Copilot in Power BI allows users to query their datasets in plain language and automatically get visualizations and insights. For example, a user can type “Show me sales by region for the last three months” and Copilot will generate the appropriate chart and even format it properly. It can also provide auto-generated narratives, explaining key points like “Sales in the North region increased by 15% last quarter…” to highlight trends or anomalies. This lowers the barrier for non-technical managers to get insights quickly, without knowing SQL or DAX. Copilot can recommend suitable chart types as well (line vs. bar, etc.) based on the data. Similarly, Copilot in Excel can produce charts, pivot tables, and written summaries from data in a spreadsheet. A user might ask, “Summarize this survey data” or “Create a bar chart of revenue by product category,” and Copilot will insert the chart in the Excel file and provide a textual analysis of it. Internally, it’s generating formulas, using Excel’s analytics features, or even running Python (if needed) to fulfill the request. One important aspect is anomaly detection – Copilot’s AI can automatically flag outliers or noteworthy patterns in data. For instance, Copilot might highlight a sudden spike or drop and draw the user’s attention to it (something that traditionally required manually examining reports).

Comparison: For BI tasks, Microsoft Copilot has the advantage of direct integration with data sources and visualization tools. It effectively automates report creation and insight generation inside the platforms where data already lives. ChatGPT can guide or assist a user who is doing BI analysis (by suggesting queries or explaining results), but Copilot can perform the actions (creating the report or chart) for the user. Non-technical users benefit greatly from Copilot’s ability to go from a question to an actual dashboard or slide. ChatGPT, while powerful in analysis, would require the user to copy its output (e.g. an SQL query or chart description) into the relevant BI tool themselves. In essence, ChatGPT is like asking an expert for insight, whereas Copilot actually executes the insight within your BI software. Copilot for Power BI is explicitly aimed at “automating report creation, data interpretation, and anomaly detection” to make analytics more accessible. ChatGPT’s strength is in flexible interpretation and explanation – if you have a complex question about business strategy or need a custom metric defined, ChatGPT can articulate it well. But if you need a quick dashboard generated from your company data, Copilot is the more straightforward choice.

Copilot in Power BI can generate entire reports from natural language prompts. In this example, a user’s question resulted in Copilot producing a dashboard (chart and summary text) automatically within Power BI. This showcases how Copilot automates BI reporting, delivering both visualization and narrative insights in one go.

Statistical Analysis & Code-Based Exploration

Statistical analysis refers to computing descriptive statistics (mean, median, correlations), performing hypothesis tests, and exploring datasets for patterns or distributions. Code-based exploration is closely related – it involves writing code (e.g. in Python, R, or SQL) to manipulate and examine data. Here’s how ChatGPT and Copilot support these:

• ChatGPT-4o: ChatGPT is highly capable in statistical reasoning and can even perform calculations in many cases. For straightforward stats questions (“What is the standard deviation of this list of numbers?”), ChatGPT can do the math if the data size is small enough to handle in text. More powerfully, using its code execution feature, ChatGPT can take a dataset and run actual statistical analysis. OpenAI’s Code Interpreter (Advanced Data Analysis) effectively turns ChatGPT into a data scientist that writes Python code to analyze data. For example, a user can upload a CSV of sales data and prompt ChatGPT to “find any correlations between product price and sales volume” – ChatGPT will write a Python script (using pandas, numpy, etc.) to calculate correlation, execute it, and then return the result and possibly a plot. It can conduct t-tests, ANOVAs, regressions or any stats test available via Python libraries, then explain the findings in plain English. Ethan Mollick, a Wharton professor, noted that ChatGPT with Code Interpreter operates “at a very advanced level, automating a lot of the complexity of quantitative analysis”, and is “an impressive data scientist” in its own right. This means even non-programmers can ask ChatGPT to perform quite sophisticated statistical analyses by describing what they want. Outside of the code execution mode, ChatGPT-4o can still help generate code for analysis that a user might run in their environment (e.g. suggest a Python snippet for calculating a chi-square test). It’s also useful for exploratory data analysis (EDA) in a conversational way – a user can iteratively ask, “Now filter this data by region and plot the distribution,” and ChatGPT will carry out the steps, showing each result. The limitation is that ChatGPT’s state is ephemeral; it doesn’t persist datasets beyond the session and may struggle with extremely large datasets (limited by file size and token limits). But for moderate data and typical statistical tasks, ChatGPT-4o is remarkably effective.

• Microsoft Copilot (Excel with Python, etc.): Microsoft has brought statistical and code-based analysis capabilities directly into Excel via Copilot. Copilot in Excel with Python is a game-changer introduced in late 2024: it allows users to describe an analysis in natural language and have Copilot generate and run Python code within Excel. This means advanced statistics or data manipulation that might be difficult with pure Excel formulas can be done with Python’s extensive libraries, without the user needing to know Python syntax. For instance, a user could ask, “Perform a Monte Carlo simulation on our sales forecast” – Copilot will insert a Python script in a worksheet that executes the simulation and returns results or charts. This feature unlocks machine learning, predictive analytics, and custom visualizations (like seaborn charts, SciPy statistical tests, etc.) right inside Excel. Copilot handles explaining and inserting the code, so the user can see what’s done and reuse it. Apart from Python, Copilot in Excel can do a lot with native features: it can create pivot tables, do data cleaning (e.g. remove outliers, fill missing values) and compute summary stats just by request. The Analyst agent mentioned earlier also uses advanced reasoning to, say, detect anomalies or forecast trends in Excel, which involves statistical logic behind the scenes. In Power BI, Copilot can simplify DAX measures (like calculating year-over-year growth) through natural language, which is essentially helping with statistical/aggregative calculations in BI. And of course, GitHub Copilot can assist developers or data scientists by autocompleting code for statistical analysis in notebooks or scripts. For example, if you start writing a Python function to compute a regression, Copilot might finish the function for you, or if you write a comment “# calculate Pearson correlation between X and Y,” Copilot will try to generate the code for that. It’s very handy for speeding up coding of data exploration tasks.

Comparison: Both ChatGPT and Copilot can perform deep statistical analysis, but the workflows differ. ChatGPT-4o offers an interactive, conversational approach where you guide the analysis step by step or ask for interpretation, with the AI handling the heavy lifting of writing/running code. This is excellent for ad-hoc analysis or when you don’t have a predefined tool at hand – essentially having a statistician on call. Microsoft’s Copilot, especially with Excel’s Python integration, brings the analysis to where the data already lives. For business users comfortable with Excel, telling Copilot to run a complex analysis in-place is extremely powerful – they get results in their spreadsheet, with formulas or Python code they can examine. Copilot’s advantage is the seamless blend of natural language with a permanent record of analysis (the code and results stay in Excel or Power BI for reuse). ChatGPT’s advantage is flexibility and depth – it isn’t limited to Excel’s environment or specific functions; any library or approach is possible as long as computational resources allow. However, ChatGPT may produce solutions that need manual validation or adaptation to the user’s environment, whereas Excel Copilot’s solutions are immediately executed in a familiar application. One notable point: ChatGPT might occasionally make statistical reasoning errors if used purely in text mode (since it might sound confident even when wrong), so using its code execution is recommended for actual calculations. Copilot, by executing either Excel functions or Python, ensures the numbers are computed accurately and often even provides citations or explanations for transparency (Excel Copilot will cite data sources in text analysis outputs). In summary, ChatGPT acts as a versatile statistical analyst in chat form, while Copilot acts as an on-demand analyst embedded within your spreadsheet or BI tool.

Machine Learning and Predictive Modeling

Machine learning (ML) in data analysis might involve tasks like training predictive models (regressions, classifiers), performing clustering, or using advanced AI to find patterns. Both ChatGPT and Copilot have roles here...

• ChatGPT-4o: While ChatGPT itself is a form of AI model, it can help users build and understand other models. In conversation, ChatGPT can explain ML concepts (“How does a random forest work?”) or outline steps to build a model. More concretely, with its ability to generate and run code, ChatGPT can actually train simple models on provided data. For example, a user could upload a dataset and say “Train a logistic regression to predict if a customer will churn, and report the accuracy.” ChatGPT will write the Python code using libraries like scikit-learn, train the model, and output the accuracy and even plots (like a ROC curve) if asked. It can also perform data preprocessing (encoding, normalization) as part of that process. There are demonstrations of ChatGPT Code Interpreter performing tasks like clustering analysis on a dataset and visualizing the clusters, or doing a time-series forecast using an ARIMA model, all guided by user prompts. However, it’s important to note that ChatGPT is not optimized for large-scale ML – it works with data that can be handled in-memory in a Python session, which is typically smaller datasets (perhaps up to a few hundred thousand rows depending on complexity). It’s great for prototyping models or analyzing feature importance and then discussing the results with the user. Additionally, ChatGPT can generate code for machine learning pipelines which the user might then run in a proper environment if needed (for large data or deployment).

• Microsoft Copilot: Microsoft 365 Copilot’s integration of Python in Excel brings some ML capabilities to non-technical users. As mentioned in the Excel blog, Copilot with Python allows things like predictive analytics and forecasting without needing to know the underlying algorithms. A user could request, “Forecast next quarter’s sales using this data,” and Copilot might use a time-series model (perhaps via a Python library like Prophet) to produce a forecast. The Analyst agent in Excel explicitly handles tasks like forecasting revenues and simulating budget scenarios. It means Copilot will choose an appropriate model (could be a statistical forecast or even a simple machine learning model) to give the prediction and possibly show the Python code or Excel formulas used. In Power BI, while Copilot is more about querying data, Microsoft’s broader platform (Fabric, Azure ML) could be linked – for example, Copilot could help create a quick ML model on a dataset in Fabric’s data science environment, though this is more speculative. GitHub Copilot greatly assists developers building ML models: it can autocomplete code for model training, suggest how to use APIs of ML frameworks (TensorFlow/PyTorch), or even write documentation. It doesn’t run the models itself, but it reduces the grunt work for data scientists writing boilerplate code. Microsoft has also previewed Copilot in Azure Machine Learning (an AI assistant in Azure ML studio to help with data prep and model generation), which would be a domain-specific copilot for ML tasks – though not as widely known as of mid-2025.

Comparison: ChatGPT-4o and Microsoft Copilots both democratize aspects of machine learning, but to different extents. ChatGPT provides a conversational modeling assistant – you can essentially tell it to train a model, and it will do so and discuss it with you. This is incredibly useful for learning and prototyping. It’s like having a data scientist colleague who will write the initial code for you and explain what it did. On the other hand, Copilot (Excel) brings some automated ML into an environment comfortable for business analysts. For a user who doesn’t know anything about scikit-learn, simply asking Excel Copilot “predict X from Y” might yield a quick predictive insight. It won’t expose all the complexity – which is a double-edged sword: it’s easy, but also somewhat of a black box unless the Copilot chooses to show the code. Excel’s Copilot does show the Python code it runs for transparency, which is a great feature; it means power users can inspect or tweak it. GitHub Copilot is more for the ML developer – speeding up coding rather than providing automated end-to-end predictions. In terms of ideal use: ChatGPT is fantastic for quickly trying out different algorithms or when brainstorming the best approach (“Should I use a neural network or a decision tree for this problem?” ChatGPT can discuss pros/cons given your situation). Microsoft Copilot is ideal for getting a result quickly on known tasks (forecast the next period, classify these text entries as positive/negative feedback, etc.) integrated in business tools. One limitation: if a task is very custom or the dataset very large, a data scientist would still likely write code manually or use dedicated ML infrastructure – ChatGPT and Copilot are aids, not replacements, in heavy-duty professional ML development. But for lightweight to medium complexity ML tasks, both provide unprecedented convenience: ChatGPT by lowering the knowledge barrier (you can do ML via plain English) and Copilot by embedding ML into everyday tools like Excel.

Suitability for Different User Types

The ideal user and use-cases for ChatGPT-4o versus Microsoft Copilot can differ. We examine how each serves technical users (like developers and data scientists) and non-technical users (like business analysts, managers, and other knowledge workers).

Technical Users (Developers & Data Scientists)

ChatGPT for Technical Users: Developers and data scientists often use ChatGPT-4o as an on-demand coding and problem-solving assistant. For coding tasks, ChatGPT can generate functions or scripts in a range of programming languages, explain algorithms, and even help debug errors by analyzing code snippets. Its strength lies in interactive explanation – a developer can paste an error message or a piece of code and ask, “Why is this not working?” and ChatGPT will attempt to diagnose the issue and suggest fixes. Data scientists can leverage ChatGPT for brainstorming analytical approaches or getting quick syntax help (e.g., “How do I group a pandas DataFrame by date and compute the mean?”). In terms of data analysis, technical users benefit from ChatGPT’s ability to write code (SQL queries, Python data transformations, etc.) much faster than doing it manually, and with GPT-4o’s vast knowledge, it often produces correct and optimized solutions. Another use is explaining complex data concepts: a data scientist can ask ChatGPT to summarize a research paper or explain a statistical concept in simpler terms, aiding their understanding. ChatGPT is essentially multi-domain, which suits technical users who may switch contexts (one moment writing a Python script, next writing documentation, next analyzing model results). Many developers integrate ChatGPT via the API into their workflows – for example, using plugins in IDEs or Slack bots to consult ChatGPT without leaving their coding environment. However, such integrations are community-driven; officially, ChatGPT is outside the IDE, so devs often copy-paste between ChatGPT and their code editor. Technical users also appreciate that ChatGPT can handle longer context (especially if using GPT-4 32K or future larger context models) – feeding an entire log file or codebase excerpt to get insights is something Copilot can’t do as easily. That said, ChatGPT’s outputs still need verification; developers know to test and debug the AI-generated code. In Stack Overflow’s 2024 survey, 82% of developers reported using ChatGPT, making it by far the most used AI dev tool, roughly twice as popular as GitHub Copilot. This indicates that even technical professionals lean on ChatGPT heavily, likely due to its comprehensive abilities and freeform Q&A style.

Microsoft Copilot for Technical Users: The primary offering for developers is GitHub Copilot. This tool is highly suitable for programmers because it integrates directly into code editors and IDEs. As you write code, Copilot suggests the next line or a whole function, which can dramatically speed up coding by reducing boilerplate work. For instance, a developer writing a function to read a CSV, filter some data, and plot it might see Copilot complete the entire sequence after they write a descriptive comment. It’s great for productivity – GitHub’s research found Copilot can help developers code up to 55% faster on certain tasks. It also increases developer satisfaction; in one enterprise study, 90% of developers said they felt more fulfilled with their job when using Copilot, and 95% enjoyed coding more with Copilot’s help. These stats suggest technical users see Copilot as a valuable “pair programmer.” Beyond GitHub Copilot, technical users also have Copilot in other domains: e.g., Power BI’s Copilot for BI developers, which can generate DAX code or T-SQL queries; or Power Apps Copilot for citizen developers building apps with low-code. The common theme is that Copilot handles a lot of syntax and suggests best practices, letting the developer focus on higher-level logic. Data scientists writing Python or R can use GitHub Copilot in Jupyter notebooks (with extensions) to get suggestions within their workflow. They might also use Copilot Chat (an extension of GitHub Copilot that allows asking questions in natural language within VS Code) to get explanations for code or help with refactoring. One advantage for technical users in enterprise: Microsoft Copilot (especially in 365 and GitHub Enterprise) operates within a secured environment. Developers working on proprietary code can use Copilot Enterprise which ensures their code snippets won’t be used to train the AI and keeps data private. This addresses a key concern some professionals have with past AI tools. In summary, Copilot is directly embedded in the tools developers already use, making it very convenient for day-to-day coding. It’s less about broad knowledge or step-by-step explanation (areas where ChatGPT excels) and more about in-context suggestions and automation of routine coding. Technical users might use both: for example, using ChatGPT to discuss an approach or generate a complex snippet, and GitHub Copilot to handle the mundane completions as they implement that approach.

To compare: Technical folks will find ChatGPT better for open-ended problem solving and explanations, and Copilot better for in-line coding assistance and automation. A developer might ask ChatGPT to write a tricky algorithm and explain its complexity, then rely on Copilot to fill in repetitive code patterns as they integrate that algorithm into their codebase. Data analysts might use ChatGPT to interpret statistical results, but use Copilot in Excel or Power BI to quickly generate the formula or visual they need. The two can be complementary; indeed many developers run ChatGPT on one screen and have Copilot in their IDE on another. If forced to choose: a developer who is constantly coding inside an IDE might lean towards GitHub Copilot as indispensable, whereas one who often needs to research new APIs or learn unfamiliar tech might rely more on ChatGPT’s detailed answers.

Non-Technical Users (Business Analysts & Knowledge Workers)

ChatGPT for Non-Technical Users: ChatGPT’s natural language prowess makes it attractive to non-technical users as well. Business analysts, managers, or really anyone who can describe their problem in English can try asking ChatGPT for help. For instance, a marketing analyst who isn’t a programmer could paste some sales figures into ChatGPT and ask for trends or outliers; ChatGPT can then write a brief report or list key points. Likewise, an HR manager could ask ChatGPT to create an Excel formula (“How do I extract the first name from a full name in Excel?”) – ChatGPT will produce the formula and explain how to use it. Non-technical users often use ChatGPT like a research and writing assistant: summarizing survey responses, drafting a report on recent performance, or translating data insights into plain language. In terms of data analysis specifically, if a knowledge worker doesn’t have access to advanced BI tools, they might rely on ChatGPT to do light analysis: e.g., “Here is a list of project durations, what is the average and which are above average?” and ChatGPT will compute and answer. ChatGPT can also educate users: a business user can ask it to define a term (“What is a p-value in simple terms?”) or guide them (“What chart is best to show the distribution of ages of customers?”), which helps them improve their own analytical thinking. The barrier for non-technical users is that ChatGPT is separate from their usual work tools – it’s a website (or app) where they’d need to manually input data or copy outputs back. This can be a bit cumbersome and also raises data privacy flags (savvy business users will be cautious about putting confidential company data into the public ChatGPT interface). ChatGPT Enterprise addresses some privacy concerns, but average knowledge workers might only have access to the free or Plus version. Nonetheless, many business users embraced ChatGPT in 2023–2024 for tasks like financial analysis summaries, quick data sanity checks, and generating formula code, precisely because it allowed them to bypass needing an expert for quick questions. The conversational format is less intimidating than code or formulas, making ChatGPT an approachable “consultant” for those less versed in data science.

Microsoft Copilot for Non-Technical Users: This is where Microsoft Copilot truly aims to excel. Non-technical knowledge workers are the core audience for Microsoft 365 Copilot – people who spend their day in Office apps and could use AI to handle tedious tasks or complex operations. For a business analyst or manager, Copilot in Excel can perform data analysis without them writing a single formula. They can simply ask, “Which product category grew the fastest year-over-year?” and Copilot will analyze the spreadsheet and give an answer, possibly with a small chart or by highlighting the relevant cells. Similarly, these users can ask Copilot in Excel to create a visualization or find any anomalies in the data and get immediate results in the sheet. This is extremely empowering for someone who might have only basic Excel skills – they can achieve results akin to what a seasoned analyst might do, just by describing their needs. Power BI Copilot extends this to dashboards, letting users who are not BI experts ask questions of enterprise data and get fully formed interactive reports. For example, a sales manager could use Copilot in Power BI to generate a quick dashboard during a meeting to answer an ad-hoc question, rather than saying “I’ll get back to you next week with those numbers.” In Teams, Copilot can summarize chats and meetings, which, while not numerical analysis, does help distill information (imagine it summarizing a brainstorming session’s takeaways or generating a list of tasks from a meeting transcript – very useful for project managers). In Word and PowerPoint, Copilot helps compile data into narratives: it can draft a report based on some data points or create slides with charts from an Excel data range. All of this caters to the non-technical user’s main goal: get insights and communicate them, with minimal learning curve. Microsoft’s design of Copilot keeps it embedded – for instance, in Outlook, Copilot might pre-sort your important emails and draft responses. In essence, it’s like each person gets a personal assistant that’s aware of their work context and can perform a variety of tasks that normally required either expertise or a lot of manual effort. Early user studies showed strong reception: 77% of early Copilot users said they “wouldn’t want to give it up” once they had it, and about 70% felt it made them more productive and improved their work quality. This indicates that non-technical users see immediate value in Copilot handling routine or complex tasks, allowing them to focus on more strategic work.

To compare: For a non-technical professional, Microsoft Copilot is generally more accessible and integrated. It works inside the applications they already use and often uses their own business data (with proper security). This reduces friction – they don’t need to export or explain their data to the AI; Copilot already “sees” the open spreadsheet or the content of their emails (with permissions) and can act on it. ChatGPT, while incredibly intelligent, requires the user to take initiative in feeding it information and moving outputs back to their work. Also, Copilot can act (e.g., insert a formula or chart in Excel automatically), whereas ChatGPT can only instruct the user what to do (the user has to implement ChatGPT’s advice themselves). In terms of ease: asking Copilot in natural language within Excel “highlight any outliers in this data” is arguably easier than copying the data to ChatGPT and asking the same; plus Copilot can directly highlight the cells in Excel, something ChatGPT alone cannot do. On the other hand, ChatGPT might sometimes provide more elaborate explanations or creative approaches since it’s not confined to a specific domain. If a non-technical user needed a very detailed report with a narrative, ChatGPT might produce a multi-paragraph analysis that’s readily copy-pasteable, whereas Copilot might give a succinct answer unless prompted for more detail. Another factor is cost and access: ChatGPT’s basic version is free and Plus is relatively cheap, so an individual can use it on their own. Microsoft 365 Copilot, however, comes at an enterprise cost (we will detail pricing later) and might not be available to every employee unless a company invests in it. For a solo analyst at a small firm, ChatGPT might be the only option if Microsoft Copilot isn’t licensed for them. But for larger organizations that adopt Copilot, their non-tech employees stand to gain a robust tool tailored to their daily tasks.

So...technical users will likely use both tools but lean on ChatGPT for deep dives and Copilot for coding convenience, whereas non-technical users will get more immediate benefit from Microsoft Copilot’s in-app assistance, with ChatGPT as a supplementary aide for general Q&A or external research. Both groups see productivity gains: developers complete tasks faster (Copilot making coding ~55% faster) and business users save time on reports and emails (just a couple of Copilot features can save hours per week, easily justifying its cost according to ROI analyses).

Platform Integrations

One of the biggest practical differences between ChatGPT and Microsoft’s Copilots is how and where you use them. Below, we outline the key platform integrations and access points for each...

• ChatGPT: The primary interface for ChatGPT-4o is through OpenAI’s ChatGPT web app (or official mobile app). It’s essentially a standalone chat interface. However, ChatGPT can be integrated into other platforms via the OpenAI API. This means developers can embed GPT-4 models into custom applications, websites, or workflows. For example, some companies have integrated ChatGPT into their internal tools (like an “Ask the data assistant” button on their intranet) using OpenAI’s API. There are also third-party browser extensions and plugins for IDEs (like VS Code) that let users query ChatGPT without switching context. OpenAI introduced ChatGPT Plugins (in 2023) which allow ChatGPT to interface with external services – for instance, a plugin could let ChatGPT pull data from a database or call an external BI tool’s API. In 2025, these evolved into ChatGPT Tools/Functions where the model can use predefined functions; one could imagine a function that fetches data from a corporate data warehouse, enabling ChatGPT to answer using live company data. Still, these require someone to set them up. Natively, ChatGPT isn’t “integrated” into Excel, VS Code, or other apps – you use it alongside them. Microsoft’s partnership with OpenAI means there are some crossovers: Bing Chat (in Edge browser and Windows 11) uses GPT-4 and behaves similar to ChatGPT, and it can pull live web data. Windows 11 even has a Windows Copilot (accessible via Win+C) which is essentially Bing Chat integrated into the OS for general assistance. This can do things like adjust settings or summarize content on the screen. While that’s not ChatGPT per se, it’s a close sibling. ChatGPT’s API allows integration into Jupyter notebooks (some data scientists use it to generate code by calling the API from within a notebook) or other development tools. But such usage is not as seamless out-of-the-box as GitHub Copilot’s integration. To summarize: ChatGPT is mostly accessed through its own interface or via API in custom ways; it’s not tied to any single platform, which is a strength (very flexible) and a weakness (not context-aware of your current app without custom work).

• Microsoft Copilot Integrations: This is where Microsoft has invested heavily – deep integration into the Microsoft 365 ecosystem and development tools. Key integrations include...

  • Office Apps: Copilot appears as an assistant pane in Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, and Teams. In Word, you might see a Copilot sidebar that can draft or rewrite text. In Excel, Copilot can be launched from the ribbon or even by typing “=” in a cell followed by a natural language prompt to generate a formula (newer Excel versions let you enter a formula in plain English and Copilot will translate it to an actual Excel formula). In PowerPoint, Copilot can create slides (including choosing images or generating icons via Designer) based on a prompt or outline. In Teams, Copilot can be @-mentioned in a chat to summarize the thread or to schedule a meeting based on conversation context. Essentially, whatever Office app you’re in, Copilot is a click away and context-aware of that app’s content. It can pull data from your files if you allow: e.g., while in Excel you could ask “Use data from QuarterlySales.xlsx and create a summary in Word” – Copilot can reference that other file because it’s connected through Microsoft Graph (with appropriate permissions).

  • Microsoft Teams & Viva: Teams Copilot can recap meetings, generate meeting agendas or action item lists from chat, and even answer questions about what happened in past meetings (since it has organizational memory, if enabled). Viva, Microsoft’s employee experience platform, is getting Copilot features where it can answer HR questions or help with learning materials by pulling from internal knowledge bases.

  • Power Platform: Copilot is integrated in Power Apps, Power Automate, and Power Virtual Agents. In Power Apps, a user can literally type “Build an app to track customer calls with fields for name, date, and notes” and Copilot will attempt to generate that app’s basic layout and data schema. In Power Automate (for workflows), Copilot can create automation flows from descriptions like “When a file is added to SharePoint, send me an email and update the tracker Excel.” This again uses natural language to configure what normally would be a technical task. For data analysis, Power Automate’s integration means you could have Copilot help set up data pipelines or alerts (e.g., if sales drop below a threshold, trigger an alert).

  • Visual Studio Code & GitHub: GitHub Copilot integrates into VS Code, Visual Studio, and other IDEs as noted, appearing as inline suggestions or a chat window within the IDE. This is a direct integration targeted at developers. There’s also Copilot for CLI, a less-known but useful integration where you can get AI suggestions in the command line (for example, explain a shell error or suggest a bash command).

  • Jupyter Notebooks: While not officially a Microsoft product, GitHub Copilot’s support for Jupyter means data scientists in notebooks can use it. Also, Azure Databricks and Azure Data Studio have some AI-assisted features (Databricks introduced an AI assistant for writing code in notebooks, which likely uses similar tech to Copilot).

  • Third-Party Integrations via Microsoft Graph Connectors: Microsoft 365 Copilot can search across not just Microsoft apps but also connected third-party services (if set up) through an enterprise’s Microsoft Graph. For instance, if Jira or Confluence data is connected, Copilot Search can answer questions using those sources. This means Copilot can become a kind of universal enterprise answer engine, analyzing data from multiple platforms when a user asks (useful for research or troubleshooting tasks).

In contrast to ChatGPT, which treats each conversation as isolated unless the user provides context, Copilot’s integration means it can use the context of the active document or application by default. This is huge – it doesn’t need you to copy the spreadsheet into a prompt; if you ask Excel Copilot “What are the top 3 variances in this table?”, it knows “this table” refers to the one you have selected in Excel. Similarly, Copilot in Word can insert content at the cursor or modify selected text because it’s built into the UI. This tight coupling is arguably Microsoft Copilot’s greatest strength for usability.

Comparative Note: The differences in integration reflect differing philosophies: ChatGPT aims to be a general AI brain accessible everywhere via natural language (and leaves integration largely to API developers), whereas Microsoft builds many specialized “brains” into each software context (all under the Copilot brand). If you live entirely in the Microsoft ecosystem, Copilot offers a frictionless experience – you might barely realize you’re using AI; it feels like the apps just got smarter. If you work a lot outside that ecosystem or need a more customizable AI, ChatGPT (especially via API) is more flexible. It’s worth noting Microsoft’s approach ties Copilot usage to certain environments (and licensing), while ChatGPT being cloud-based and open via API means you can integrate it into Linux tools, Google Colab, or any scenario with HTTP requests.

In terms of collaboration and sharing: outputs from Copilot are already in the app, so sharing is just like sharing any Office document or code commit. With ChatGPT, if a team is collaborating via ChatGPT, they might have to manually share the Q&A transcript or produced files.

Finally, a point on data privacy and compliance under integration: Microsoft emphasizes that Copilot in enterprise is built with compliance in mind – it respects things like data loss prevention policies, permissions (it won’t show a user data they aren’t allowed to access), and auditing through Microsoft’s compliance center. ChatGPT in its base form does not have those enterprise controls (ChatGPT Enterprise does encrypt and not train on data, but it’s still not directly tied into your access controls). So from an integration perspective, companies might prefer Copilot as it slots into their managed IT environment.

In summary, ChatGPT can be accessed nearly anywhere you can call an API or open a browser, but requires manual context provisioning; Microsoft Copilot is embedded in key platforms and leverages context automatically, making it very convenient within those ecosystems. The best scenario might be using ChatGPT alongside Copilot: for instance, a user could use Teams Copilot to summarize a meeting, then copy that summary to ChatGPT to refine the wording creatively – leveraging Copilot’s integration and ChatGPT’s general brilliance together.

Performance and Productivity Benchmarks

Evaluating AI assistants isn’t just about features – it’s also about how much they boost productivity and how well they perform on tasks. While direct “benchmark scores” for ChatGPT-4o vs Copilot on data analysis tasks are hard to quantify, we can cite available studies and anecdotal evidence of their impact:

• GitHub Copilot – Productivity Studies: GitHub has conducted research on Copilot’s effect on developer productivity. In a controlled study (with Accenture developers), results showed Copilot users completed tasks significantly faster than those without. In fact, GitHub reports that Copilot can help developers code up to 55% faster on certain tasks. That is, tasks that might take an hour could be done in roughly half the time with Copilot’s assistance. The same study noted improved code confidence and satisfaction – 85% of developers felt more confident in their code quality when using Copilot, and as mentioned, 95% enjoyed coding more. Another metric from GitHub’s surveys: on average, 27% of code written by Copilot users was directly suggested by Copilot (this was an earlier stat; with deeper adoption, it may be higher). This indicates a significant portion of code is offloaded to the AI, freeing developers’ time. Moreover, 90% of developers in the Accenture trial said they were more fulfilled in their job with Copilot, suggesting that eliminating tedious work has qualitative benefits as well. These kinds of results are part of why over 50,000 organizations had adopted GitHub Copilot by 2024. In terms of code quality, there are metrics like acceptance rate of suggestions: one study showed a ~27% acceptance rate for Copilot suggestions on average – not everything is used, but those that are save effort. In pull request analyses, there were signals of Copilot increasing code merge speeds and possibly even quality (one report found a 5% higher approval rate for AI-written code in PRs). For data analysis tasks specifically (like writing a Python script to analyze data), we don’t have published metrics, but it’s reasonable to assume similar gains: Copilot can handle boilerplate (reading files, setting up loops) quickly, letting analysts spend more time interpreting results.

• ChatGPT – Usage and Effectiveness: While OpenAI hasn’t published “time saved” metrics as clearly, the widespread adoption of ChatGPT speaks to its utility. The 2024 Stack Overflow survey showed that ChatGPT was the most used AI tool by developers (82% usage), vastly more than any other, including Copilot. And 74% of those developers wanted to continue using it or use it even more. This implies that developers find ChatGPT effective enough to weave into their routines. Another indirect measure: Stack Overflow’s traffic reportedly dropped by significant percentages in 2023–2024 as developers turned to ChatGPT for answers that they used to search on forums. In terms of performance on analytical reasoning, GPT-4 (and by extension GPT-4o) has excelled in many benchmarks – for example, it can solve many LeetCode programming problems, perform at a high level on math and logic puzzles, and pass professional exams. While those aren’t business data analysis tasks, they show the model’s raw capability. In user-case scenarios, you often hear anecdotes like “ChatGPT Plus with code interpreter saved me hours of work by automating a report that would have taken me a day to do manually.” For non-technical tasks, Microsoft cited that with Copilot, on average 1 hour is saved in a typical work week per user just through the kinds of tasks it automates. ChatGPT likely offers similar or more savings when used effectively – for instance, a financial analyst might use ChatGPT to draft commentary on quarterly results in 10 minutes rather than spending an hour writing it from scratch, or a consultant could get a first draft of a data-heavy PowerPoint slide deck via ChatGPT to accelerate their workflow.

• Quality of Outputs: Productivity isn’t just speed – it’s also about whether the tools produce useful, accurate outputs. Here, both tools have considerations:

  • ChatGPT (especially GPT-4/4o) is known for high-quality, fluent text and well-structured code. But it can sometimes hallucinate – e.g., it might make up a statistic or mislabel a chart if it’s guessing. When doing data analysis, if given correct data and using code execution, the risk of factual error is reduced (since it calculates things). But purely in text, one must be cautious. Meanwhile, Copilot will only suggest code or formulas based on patterns it learned – it can sometimes suggest a wrong formula or a suboptimal code approach. The advantage Copilot has is it’s often constrained by context (like a specific syntax or data), so it’s less likely to “make something up” that’s completely unrelated. However, a Copilot in Power BI might generate a visual that is technically correct but misleading or not the one the user intended (e.g., it might default to a sum when an average was desired). Microsoft’s documentation even warns that Copilot doesn’t guarantee correctness or factuality – users should treat it as an assistant, not an oracle. Responsible usage involves verifying critical results.

  • A positive on quality: Copilot in Excel now provides citations for text analysis it generates. For instance, if it summarizes text data (like customer feedback) and makes an assertion (“Most customers mentioned price”), it will cite which cells or sources back that up. This is a great practice to ensure transparency. ChatGPT, in its base form, doesn’t cite sources unless specifically asked to or if using a plugin like a web browser. So for traceability, Copilot may have an edge in enterprise contexts.

• Learning Curve and Adoption: Productivity gains also depend on how easily users adopt the tool. Both ChatGPT and Copilot have quick learning curves because they use natural language. That said, early on some developers found Copilot’s inline suggestions distracting or not always on target, requiring a slight adjustment in coding style to take advantage of it. With newer features like Copilot Chat and more configurable settings (e.g., turning it off for certain files), this has improved. ChatGPT is straightforward to use, but getting the most out of it can involve learning prompt techniques (prompt engineering). Organizations often have “best practice” guides like use clear step-by-step prompts or provide examples to ChatGPT for better results. The need for these practices suggests that some users get more value than others – those who learn how to phrase requests clearly will see better performance from ChatGPT. Microsoft aims to simplify this by providing suggested prompts in Copilot (the Excel Copilot pane, for example, might show prompts like “Explain this formula” or “Summarize data” so the user can just click them).

• Scalability and Speed: In terms of response speed, GPT-4 models (including ChatGPT-4o) are a bit slower than older GPT-3.5, but still responses are typically within seconds for moderate prompts. Copilot suggestions in code happen almost instantly as you type, by design (they’re shorter context so it’s quick). For very large tasks, ChatGPT might take longer or hit token limits. For instance, analyzing a 300-page document would have to be chunked. Copilot might leverage the larger context windows available in Azure OpenAI for certain tasks (Microsoft hinted at larger context support through the Graph). As of mid-2025, both are quite usable in real-time, but heavy data analysis (lots of computation) might be faster to just run in a proper environment than via AI assistant – hence why Copilot offloads to Python in Excel or ChatGPT runs Python under the hood: they use actual code execution for heavy lifting rather than pure neural computation.

So, both ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot have demonstrated substantial productivity benefits. GitHub Copilot has hard numbers showing it speeds up coding by ~50% and greatly improves developer morale. Microsoft 365 Copilot’s early user feedback shows strong perceived productivity gains (users saving hours and not wanting to work without it). ChatGPT’s massive adoption and displacement of traditional research channels is a testament to its effectiveness. Each tool, however, requires users to remain vigilant about accuracy. When used wisely – verifying outputs and combining AI suggestions with human judgment – the performance of both in assisting data analysis is impressive. Perhaps the ultimate “benchmark” is that tasks which were once inaccessible to a person (due to lack of skill or time) are now within reach. A non-coder can generate a correct Python analysis script (thanks to ChatGPT or Excel Copilot), and a time-pressed analyst can produce a polished report in minutes rather than days. Those qualitative leaps are the real win of these AI copilots.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

We now provide a direct comparison of key features relevant to data analysis, highlighting how ChatGPT-4o and Microsoft Copilot respectively handle each...

• Code Generation & Scripting: Both excel at generating code, but in different contexts. ChatGPT-4o can produce any kind of code (Python for data analysis, R, SQL, VBA for Excel, etc.) from a prompt and explain it in detail. You interact in a conversational loop – e.g., “Write a Python function to clean this data” and then “Now optimize it for speed”. It’s like a senior engineer reviewing or writing code with you. GitHub Copilot, on the other hand, generates code as you type within an IDE. It’s great for boilerplate and completing the developer’s thoughts. For example, type a comment “# calculate average of list” and Copilot may immediately suggest the Python code to do that. Copilot doesn’t usually volunteer lengthy explanations (unless you use the Copilot Chat interface), and it doesn’t generate entire multi-file projects on its own (ChatGPT can outline or even fully write a simple project if asked). In summary: ChatGPT is better when you want a block of code or script given a description (especially outside an IDE, or in languages not supported by Copilot), whereas Copilot is better for on-the-fly code completion and staying in the flow. Both can assist with data analysis code – ChatGPT might generate a full pandas data cleaning script with commentary, while Copilot might assist you cell-by-cell in a Jupyter Notebook. An important note: ChatGPT can also execute the code it writes (in Advanced Data Analysis mode), which is a unique feature; Copilot generates code, but running it (and debugging) is up to the user.

• Natural Language Querying: Natural language querying means asking questions in plain English and getting answers (numbers, text, or charts) from data. ChatGPT is inherently designed for NL queries – you literally converse with it in natural language. If you give it data (or it has access via plugins), you can ask anything. It will do its best to parse the question and your data and reply appropriately. However, without explicit data, ChatGPT answers from its trained knowledge which might not be up-to-date or specific to your case. Microsoft Copilot is specifically enabling NL queries within apps: e.g., “Who are my top 5 customers by revenue?” asked in Excel or Power BI will yield an answer drawn from your sheet or dataset. In Power BI, Copilot uses the semantic model (the data and relationships defined in your BI dataset) to interpret the query accurately. It can handle follow-up questions too (e.g., “Now break that down by month” to refine the query). The advantage of Copilot here is that it’s grounded – it knows the field names, the data types, and can therefore be more precise (with GPT-4 under the hood, it likely translates NL to a DAX or SQL query then executes it). ChatGPT trying the same would either guess or require the user to provide schema and data. For open-ended analytical questions not tied to a dataset (like “What factors typically drive customer churn?”), ChatGPT can give a general insightful answer based on its training, which Copilot would not do unless it’s summarizing provided info. Also, ChatGPT can incorporate external knowledge (with browsing enabled or if the question is generic), whereas Copilot is constrained to available data and isn’t meant for general knowledge Q&A. Overall, for ad-hoc questions on your own data, Copilot is extremely handy and user-friendly; for general analytic questions or multi-step reasoning across domains, ChatGPT is more capable.

• Data Visualization: Turning data into charts/visuals is a key part of analysis. ChatGPT-4o (with code) can create visualizations by generating code (matplotlib, seaborn, etc. in Python, or even HTML/JS charts) and returning an image or chart description. It will actually generate the chart when using the Advanced Data Analysis mode and can show it to you as an output image. This means a non-programmer can ask, “Plot the distribution of ages in this dataset” and ChatGPT will produce a histogram plot image. However, outside of that mode, ChatGPT can only describe what a chart should look like or provide code to produce it. Microsoft Copilot has multiple avenues for visuals: In Excel, Copilot can insert charts directly into the spreadsheet upon request. It chooses chart types based on the data and even formats them. In Power BI, producing visuals is a core feature – Copilot essentially builds the actual interactive chart in a report for you. Additionally, Copilot can suggest which visualization might be best (for example, it might say “This data would be best shown as a line chart over time” and then create one). In PowerPoint, Copilot can generate charts in slides if data is provided or linked, and it can also find relevant images or create icons via Bing Image Creator (for illustrative purposes in reports). One novel Copilot feature is Copilot Create, which can generate custom images or simple graphics for you in Word/PowerPoint using DALL-E or similar models – not exactly data visualization, but useful for visual communication. For comparing: ChatGPT requires a bit more manual step (and possibly the user to look at an image output separately), whereas Copilot’s visuals are in-place and easily adjustable (because they are actual Excel or Power BI objects). If the question is, “which tool helps a user go from data to a polished chart fastest?”, the answer is Microsoft Copilot. But if someone wanted a highly customized or novel visualization (like a rare chart type or combining data from multiple sources in one graph), ChatGPT might help code it, whereas Copilot might not support that in its UI. Also, ChatGPT can interpret images (with vision enabled GPT-4) – meaning you could show ChatGPT a chart image and ask it to analyze it. That’s a different angle of visualization support (consuming visuals) which Copilot doesn’t directly do.

• Formula Assistance (Excel/Spreadsheet formulas): Many data analysis tasks for business users boil down to writing the correct Excel formula or Google Sheets formula. ChatGPT is already famous for helping with this – users paste a description like “I need a formula that extracts the domain from an email address” and ChatGPT will provide, for example, =MID(A1, FIND("@",A1)+1, LEN(A1)) with an explanation. It’s like having an Excel expert on call. ChatGPT can also debug formulas or suggest why a certain formula isn’t working. Copilot in Excel takes this a step further by being part of Excel: a user can literally type their request in plain English where they would normally type a formula, and Excel (with Copilot) will fill the cell with the correct formula. The techcommunity notes and previews show a feature where typing “= sum of sales by region” yields the actual formula or maybe even a dynamic array result. This is incredibly helpful for those who know what they want to calculate but not the syntax. Copilot also has an “explain this formula” ability – you can select a complicated nested formula and Copilot will generate a step-by-step explanation in natural language. This demystifies spreadsheets and is a great learning tool. ChatGPT can do similar if you copy the formula into the chat, but Copilot does it in one click in Excel. When it comes to Power BI’s formulas (DAX), ChatGPT can try to help (if asked, it might produce a DAX measure formula description). However, DAX is complex, and here Copilot in Power BI is extremely useful: it allows NL descriptions to create measures (e.g., “calculate percent growth in sales vs last year”) and it will output the correct DAX expression. DAX is notoriously tricky for many users, so this feature alone can save hours. Copilot can also narrate what a DAX measure does if needed. So, for formula assistance, Copilot is like an integrated mentor that writes or critiques formulas in situ, whereas ChatGPT is an external mentor that tells you what to write. Both are valuable; Copilot is more convenient for Microsoft product users. ChatGPT has the slight edge of being able to help with formulas in any platform (Excel, Google Sheets, SQL, etc.) as long as you ask, whereas Copilot is specific to Microsoft’s tools. But since Excel is ubiquitous, Copilot’s integration there covers a huge ground.

• Task Automation & Workflow: Automation in analysis might involve scheduling data refreshes, sending reports, or integrating multiple steps (ETL processes, notifications). ChatGPT can generate code for automation (like a Python script to fetch data and email a report, or a PowerShell script to update a database). It can also create outlines for complex workflows if asked. But ChatGPT won’t run these as a continuous workflow (beyond its one-off execution in a session). A savvy user could use ChatGPT to build a small program or macro that automates something and then run that outside ChatGPT regularly. Microsoft’s Copilot and Power Platform make automation more user-friendly: for instance, Power Automate Copilot allows users to describe a workflow in natural language (“When a new row is added in the sales Excel, send a Teams message to the finance channel”) and it will create the flow with the necessary connectors. This lowers the bar for non-developers to automate tasks. Similarly, Copilot in Outlook/Teams can automate email or message triage – e.g., Outlook’s Copilot can draft replies to multiple emails or summarize your inbox, effectively automating the “reading and responding” workflow. Teams Copilot can generate meeting summaries and even suggest action items with due dates automatically. These are all forms of automating the drudgery around data: e.g., instead of someone manually reading through chat logs to create a follow-up to-dos list, Copilot does it. In coding workflows, GitHub Copilot even has a feature called “Copilot CLI” which helps with command line tasks by turning natural language into commands (handy for automating environment setup tasks for devs). Additionally, Microsoft is working on Copilot X features where the AI can open pull requests, generate tests, etc., automating parts of the software development lifecycle. The takeaway is that Copilot is embedded in workflow tools to streamline multi-step processes, whereas ChatGPT provides guidance or scripts which the user must implement into a workflow. Another dimension: ChatGPT’s plugins could connect to task services (for example, there was a Zapier plugin that allowed ChatGPT to trigger actions in other apps). So ChatGPT can act in limited ways if configured – e.g., it could take an instruction like “send a Slack message if this analysis finds a problem” if it has the right plugin. But those require setup and giving ChatGPT access to systems, which not everyone will do. Microsoft Copilot has it pre-wired within a business’s secure infrastructure.

To sum up the feature comparison:

• ChatGPT-4o: excels in free-form code and text generation, rich conversational Q&A, broad knowledge, and can perform multi-step reasoning in one dialogue. It’s like a Swiss army knife: very flexible – you can use it for writing code, explaining results, brainstorming metrics, etc. However, it’s not inherently connected to your tools or data; you have to feed it context and implement its suggestions manually (in most cases). Great for when you need ideas, explanations, or code that you’ll apply yourself.

• Microsoft Copilot: excels in contextual assistance and action within applications. It’s like having an assistant in each app that knows how to do things in that app for you. It’s superb at translating natural language to actual features: formulas in Excel, charts in Power BI, drafts in Word, emails in Outlook. It automates a lot of the busywork directly. Its code assistance (GitHub Copilot) is more constrained to filling in code rather than lengthy dialogue, but extremely effective within that scope. The flipside is that Copilot is limited to what it’s been integrated with – it won’t write you a poem or help with a random Linux command (unless you’re in a context where it knows that, like Copilot CLI). It’s focused on productivity within known domains.

Below is a comparison table summarizing some of these feature differences:

Feature	ChatGPT-4o (GPT-4)	Microsoft Copilot (Excel, Power BI, GitHub, etc.)
Code Generation	Conversationally generates code in any language; can produce full scripts and explain them. Must copy into your environment to run (unless using built-in execution).	Inline code suggestions in IDE (GitHub Copilot) for dozens of languages; high-speed autocompletion of functions. Limited to context of file/editor (no long explanations by default).
Natural Language Query	Understands and answers NL questions using its trained knowledge or provided data. Needs data given in prompt or via plugins for specific answers. Great for conceptual Q&A.	Integrated NL query in apps (Excel, Power BI): directly answers questions using your data/models. E.g., generates charts or answers from a spreadsheet. Context-aware to app’s data; not for general world questions.
Data Visualization	Can generate visualizations by outputting code (Python, etc.) and displaying charts. Describes charts in words well. Not directly embedded in BI tools.	Automatically creates charts/graphs in Excel/Power BI from prompts. Recommends visualization types. Inserts visuals into documents/presentations. Very convenient in-app, but limited to typical chart types.
Formula/Data Queries	Provides formulas (Excel, Google Sheets, SQL) or DAX code from descriptions, with explanations. Requires user to paste into tool.	Generates formulas or DAX directly in Excel/Power BI. User can enter a plain query in Excel (“= formula for X”) to get a working formula. Can also explain formulas in-place.
Automation	Can suggest scripts or outline processes to automate tasks (e.g., Python scripts, macros). Doesn’t execute multi-step workflows autonomously (without plugins).	Power Automate Copilot builds flow charts from NL descriptions. Copilot in M365 handles multi-step tasks like summarizing meetings, drafting replies, scheduling, etc. Integrated with Microsoft Graph to act across apps.
User Guidance	Provides in-depth explanations, learning, and step-by-step reasoning. Great for understanding complex topics or debugging logic.	Provides succinct tips and fixes in context (e.g., “There’s an inconsistency in this Excel column, want to standardize entries?”). Focused on getting the task done rather than teaching theory (except where explanation is requested explicitly).

(Table: Comparing features of ChatGPT-4o and Microsoft Copilot tools.)

Pricing and Access Model

The cost and availability of ChatGPT vs Microsoft Copilot differ significantly, especially given one is a standalone service and the other is packaged with enterprise software:

• ChatGPT: OpenAI offers ChatGPT in free and paid tiers. The free tier (as of 2025) allows access to the GPT-3.5 model with some rate limitations. It’s sufficient for basic Q&A and small tasks, but for the best quality (GPT-4 level) and data analysis features, users typically need ChatGPT Plus. ChatGPT Plus costs around $20 per month and provides access to GPT-4 models (including ChatGPT-4o, GPT-4 with 32k context, etc.), as well as the Advanced Data Analysis (code execution) mode and any new experimental features. There are also ChatGPT Enterprise plans for organizations – pricing for those isn’t publicly fixed (likely custom or per-seat pricing), but they offer enhanced security (no data retention by OpenAI), higher rate limits, and a much larger context window for prompts. OpenAI also has an API pay-as-you-go model: for example, using GPT-4 via API might cost on the order of $0.03–$0.06 per 1K tokens for prompt and a bit more for outputs, which can add up depending on usage. The API lets companies embed GPT into their apps with usage-based billing. By mid-2025, OpenAI had introduced models like GPT-4-turbo which offered lower cost per call than original GPT-4, making high-end models more affordable for heavy use. For an individual analyst or developer, the most straightforward cost is that $20/month for Plus – which is relatively low considering the capabilities (it’s one of the reasons for its massive adoption). In terms of access, ChatGPT is broadly accessible – sign up online, and you’re in. No special software or Microsoft account needed. This democratizes it to students, freelancers, small businesses worldwide who might not have budgets for enterprise software.

• Microsoft 365 Copilot: Microsoft’s Copilot, especially in Office apps, is positioned as an add-on for business customers. It requires that the organization has appropriate Microsoft 365 licenses. In 2023, Microsoft announced pricing of $30 per user per month for the Microsoft 365 Copilot add-on. This is on top of existing M365 E3/E5 or Business Standard/Premium licenses. In other words, an enterprise user would need, say, an Office 365 E5 license (which is already maybe ~$35/month) plus $30 for Copilot – so around $65/user/month in total to have Copilot features enabled. Microsoft 365 Copilot was in limited preview for much of 2023 and started general availability for enterprises on November 1, 2024. The $30 price is significant, reflecting the value Microsoft believes the integrated AI brings (and the computing cost of running GPT-4 on enterprise data). Some analyses argue that if Copilot saves a worker 2-3 hours a month, it pays for itself in productivity. Microsoft might introduce tiered pricing or bundle Copilot in certain high-end plans eventually, but mid-2025 guidance still lists $30/user/month as the add-on fee. For GitHub Copilot, the pricing is different: Individual developers can subscribe for $10 per month (or $100 per year) for Copilot (Pro plan). There is also Copilot Pro+ at $39/month which likely includes heavier usage of GPT-4 and additional features like Copilot Chat with higher allowances. GitHub Copilot for Business is priced at $19 per user/month and includes admin controls and organization-wide deployment. Notably, GitHub offers Copilot free to verified students and maintainers of popular open-source projects, encouraging adoption in the dev community. So, for coding, an individual can get Copilot for $10 whereas getting ChatGPT-4 requires $20 – but ChatGPT offers more than just coding help. For Power BI Copilot, currently it requires Power BI Premium or Fabric licensing (which large companies often have). There isn’t a separate price just for Power BI Copilot; it’s included if you have the capacity-based licensing (Fabric). For Power Platform Copilots (Apps/Automate), they were introduced as features within those services – pricing might be included in those licenses or counted as Azure AI credits consumption. Microsoft could eventually unify Copilot pricing, but as of 2025, it’s a bit siloed (Office Copilot $30, GitHub Copilot separate, etc.).

• Availability: ChatGPT is available in most countries (with a few exceptions due to regulations). Microsoft 365 Copilot availability is initially for enterprise customers in supported regions/languages (English was first, but Microsoft is expanding to other languages). For example, Excel Copilot with Python became available worldwide in various languages by April 2025. If you are an individual user not affiliated with a company, you currently cannot buy Microsoft 365 Copilot for just yourself (there’s no consumer version as of mid-2025, though Microsoft has piloted some consumer integrations via Windows Copilot). ChatGPT, conversely, anyone can use with an internet connection.

• Hidden Costs: For ChatGPT API usage, companies need to monitor token usage, which can become costly if usage is very high (some have reported hefty API bills if not optimized). For Microsoft Copilot, the hidden cost might be needing to upgrade licenses or the fact that it might require an enterprise agreement (meaning small businesses under certain size might not get easy access until Microsoft releases SMB offerings or includes it in Business Premium plans). Also, adopting Copilot could involve costs of compliance reviews, user training, and perhaps increased Azure backend consumption (for example, Copilot pulling data might increase MS Graph usage or similar, though presumably included in the price).

In summary, ChatGPT offers a low entry cost (free or $20/month) and flexible usage-based API pricing, making it accessible widely. Microsoft Copilot is a premium enterprise feature at $30/user/month for Office apps (with separate pricing for GitHub Copilot at $10-19). Large organizations might find the ROI worth it, but it’s a notable investment. For an individual, paying $20 for ChatGPT Plus vs $30 for Copilot (if it were even available standalone) – ChatGPT is the easier choice. But for companies already invested in Microsoft 365, adding Copilot could be a justified expense for the productivity gain. We should also note that Bing Chat Enterprise is available at $5/user/month (or included in some Microsoft 365 plans) – it’s not exactly Copilot, but it’s a secure chat AI (GPT-4) similar to ChatGPT, without the deep app integrations. Some organizations might opt to use Bing Chat Enterprise as a cheaper way to give employees an AI helper (though it won’t integrate with Office documents like Copilot does).

Finally, it’s expected that as competition heats up (Google’s workspace AI, OpenAI’s own offerings, etc.), pricing models might evolve. But as of mid-2025, OpenAI’s ChatGPT is the more budget-friendly option for broad usage, while Microsoft’s Copilot comes at a premium for its specialized integration and enterprise features.

Strengths, Weaknesses, and Ideal Use Cases

After examining capabilities and differences, we summarize the key strengths and weaknesses of ChatGPT-4o and Microsoft Copilot, and suggest where each is best utilized in the realm of data analysis:

ChatGPT-4o (OpenAI GPT-4)

Strengths:

• Advanced Reasoning & Knowledge: ChatGPT-4o is exceptionally good at understanding complex questions and performing multi-step reasoning. It leverages the vast training data of GPT-4, so it often “knows” about various analytical methods, domain knowledge, and coding practices. This makes it versatile – from writing a regression analysis to explaining heteroskedasticity, it has deep knowledge at its fingertips. It’s also creative in generating narratives or interpreting results (useful for writing analytical reports).

• Flexible and Open-Ended: ChatGPT can handle a wide array of tasks in one place. You can talk to it about an Excel formula in one message, then ask it to draft a conclusion for your data report in the next. It’s not confined to a single domain or file. This makes it a one-stop assistant for anything from brainstorming hypotheses to debugging code to polishing the wording of an insight.

• Natural Conversation & Explanation: The chat format allows for follow-up questions, clarifications, and iterative refinement. If ChatGPT’s first answer is off, you can correct it or ask it to consider additional information. It can explain its outputs in a teaching manner, which is great for learning (“Why did you choose this statistical test?” – it will gladly explain).

• Code Execution (Advanced Data Analysis): With the ability to run code, ChatGPT becomes extremely powerful for data analysis – it can generate Python/R code and verify the results itself, catching errors and iterating without the user having to intervene line-by-line. This closed-loop capability is a unique strength for doing data work quickly and correctly.

• Low Barrier to Entry: Anyone can start using ChatGPT with no setup (just a login). The Plus plan is relatively affordable, and even free ChatGPT can handle a lot of Q&A (with some limitations). This means individual analysts or students can utilize GPT-4 level AI without corporate approval or expensive software.

Weaknesses:

• Lack of Direct Integration: ChatGPT doesn’t automatically know about your data or environment. You have to feed it data (which can be cumbersome or limited by size) or use workarounds. It won’t autonomously update an Excel file or database – you must take its outputs and apply them. This makes it less efficient for continuous or large-scale workflows without custom integration.

• Data Privacy Concerns: Using ChatGPT (especially the free/Plus versions) on sensitive data is problematic for many organizations, since inputs might be stored on OpenAI’s servers (OpenAI does offer opt-out from training and enterprise privacy guarantees, but some industries remain cautious). Without enterprise-level agreements, many companies restrict ChatGPT’s use with proprietary data.

• Possibility of Errors/Hallucinations: ChatGPT can sometimes give convincingly written but incorrect answers. For example, it might cite a source that looks real but is made-up, or make an arithmetic mistake if not prompted to calculate carefully. In data analysis, a mistake in interpretation (e.g., misreading a trend or using the wrong formula) could be critical. It requires the user to have some knowledge to verify important results. Copilot’s grounding to data can mitigate this in its domain; ChatGPT might be more hit-or-miss if the question isn’t crystal clear or goes beyond its training data.

• Token Limits: While GPT-4o has a large context window (and 4.5 even larger in preview), there’s a limit to how much data you can give it in one go (e.g., maybe 50-100 pages of text or a few thousand rows of a spreadsheet in current usage). Very big datasets can’t be fully ingested. Copilot in Excel, by contrast, can operate on the whole sheet (since it can run queries or code on it). ChatGPT might need you to summarize or chunk data, which adds complexity.

• No Graphical Interface: ChatGPT’s output is text (and images when code interpreter is used, but even then, it’s just showing an image file). It doesn’t have a UI to click or refine visuals interactively. In Excel or Power BI, after Copilot creates something, you can manually tweak it in the familiar interface. With ChatGPT, if the chart it generated isn’t what you want, you have to prompt it again or manually adjust the code yourself. In other words, ChatGPT doesn’t seamlessly integrate into a GUI workflow – it’s a pure conversation.

• Rate Limits and Availability: On the free tier, ChatGPT might sometimes be at capacity, and even Plus users have a cap on messages/minute. In a heavy analysis session, you might bump into these, whereas Copilot (running on Azure in your tenant) might be more consistently available for business users. Also, ChatGPT requires internet access – if you’re offline or in a secure network with no external access, you can’t use it (OpenAI has no on-premise option; Azure OpenAI is the closest which is what Copilot uses under the hood).

Ideal Use Cases for ChatGPT-4o

Given its strengths, ChatGPT is ideal for exploratory analysis, troubleshooting, and learning scenarios...

• Ad-hoc analysis by individuals: A financial analyst wants a quick sanity check or some insight from data but doesn’t want to set up a whole BI workflow – they can throw data at ChatGPT and ask questions interactively.

• Cross-domain reasoning: A scenario combining knowledge (say, “Compare the health outcomes of region A vs B using the provided stats and known national averages”) – ChatGPT can combine given data with its general knowledge and deliver a thoughtful answer.

• When crafting reports or narratives: ChatGPT shines in turning data into well-written summaries or drafting an analysis section for a report. It can incorporate context (like company background or industry trends) more readily than Copilot, which focuses just on the data.

• For developers/data scientists working outside VS Code: If you’re, say, working in Jupyter or another IDE without Copilot, ChatGPT via web or API can serve as your code assistant. Also for tasks like algorithm explanation or pseudocode, ChatGPT is very handy.

• As an API service in custom apps: If a team builds a custom data analysis chatbot for their company, they might use GPT-4 (ChatGPT API) as the engine, because it can be fine-tuned or instructed to follow certain styles, and integrated with their data via tools. This is ideal if you want AI capabilities but in your own product (Copilot is not something you can embed elsewhere – it’s Microsoft’s offering within their apps).

Microsoft Copilot (Excel, Power BI, GitHub, M365)

Strengths:

• Seamless Integration & Context Awareness: The biggest strength is that Copilot works within the tools people already use. This means it automatically has context (your Excel dataset, your Word document text, your code in the editor, etc.) and can act on it. There’s no need for manual copy-paste of data. It feels like a natural extension of the software – e.g., formatting and updating an Excel chart that Copilot created is as easy as any other chart. This leads to high user adoption for those who get access, since it doesn’t disrupt their workflow, it enhances it.

• Action-Oriented Assistance: Copilot doesn’t just tell you what to do – it often does it. This is a profound advantage for productivity. For example, instead of telling a user “You should remove duplicates in this column,” Copilot can just execute the removal of duplicates in Excel when asked. In PowerPoint, instead of giving tips on design, it can insert a generated graphic or layout. For busy users, having the AI complete tasks (with their approval) saves more time than just advice.

• Enterprise Data Utilization: In tools like Power BI or the Microsoft Graph integration, Copilot can pull from internal data sources (SharePoint files, databases via Fabric, etc.) securely. It “grounds” responses in organizational data, which means answers are relevant and factual to the company’s actual information. For instance, if you ask Teams Copilot “What did we decide about Project X in the last meeting?”, it can retrieve the answer from the meeting transcript. ChatGPT on its own cannot do that (unless you feed it that transcript manually every time). This ability to harness enterprise data and remain compliant with security is a strong point for Copilot in businesses.

• Consistency and Formatting: Because Copilot operates the apps, the outputs adhere to the expected formats. An Excel formula from Copilot will be in proper Excel syntax and placed in the cell. A PowerPoint generated by Copilot will use the company’s template (assuming proper setup with themes), which maintains brand consistency. ChatGPT might give you great content, but you’d still need to format it into your template or system. Copilot automates that integration part.

• Multi-turn Task Handling: Copilot can keep context within a document or app session. For example, you can iteratively refine a Copilot output: “Actually, add a column for growth rate” – if said to Excel Copilot after it made a table, it understands and adjusts. Similarly, Copilot Chat in an IDE knows your opened files and can answer questions about them. This contextual continuity is a strength (though ChatGPT similarly keeps conversation context, it doesn’t have the live link to the actual content beyond what’s in the prompt history).

• Deployed at Scale by IT: For large organizations, Copilot can be rolled out and managed (permissions, enabled for certain departments, etc.). This centralized deployment means if a company wants all analysts to use AI, they can do it in a governed way with Copilot (including compliance logging, which Microsoft offers for Copilot interactions). That’s a strength in terms of making AI a standard tool – everyone on Office will see that Copilot button (if licensed) and can use it. With ChatGPT, companies have to rely on individual initiative or build their own tools to standardize usage.

Weaknesses:

• Cost and Access Limitations: At $30/user/month for M365 Copilot, it’s a pricey add-on that not every company or individual will pay for. Smaller businesses or individuals largely don’t have access yet (aside from GitHub Copilot which is cheaper and more accessible). So the reach of Copilot tools is currently limited to those in Microsoft’s ecosystem who opt in. ChatGPT’s ubiquity is something Copilot doesn’t yet have. Also, some users might only have, say, GitHub Copilot but not Office Copilot, which means their AI assistance is siloed to coding, but not available in their other apps.

• Scope is Narrower per Tool: Each Copilot is somewhat specialized. Excel’s Copilot does spreadsheets, but you can’t directly ask it to write a blog post (Word’s Copilot would do that). GitHub Copilot writes code, but won’t answer general knowledge questions about history or science. In contrast, ChatGPT can handle a coding question, a math problem, and a writing prompt all in one place. So Copilot’s narrow scope means users have to invoke different copilots for different tasks (though Microsoft 365 Chat is aiming to unify some of that across apps). There might be some fragmentation in user experience: e.g., asking something outside the Copilot’s domain might yield “I’m sorry, I can’t help with that” whereas ChatGPT would try something.

• Reliance on Microsoft Environment: Copilot is deeply tied to Microsoft’s environment (which can be a strength as discussed, but also a limitation). If your data isn’t in Microsoft products (say your company uses Google Sheets or some proprietary BI system), Copilot won’t directly help. Or if you’re a Mac user not using Office 365, you can’t use Copilot in your older Excel. ChatGPT being platform-agnostic works anywhere. So Copilot’s coverage outside the MS world is a weakness. Even within, if data is locked in some legacy system not connected to Graph or Fabric, Copilot may not access it.

• Potential to Automate Mistakes: Because Copilot can do things (like delete columns, send emails, etc.), a mistake or misinterpretation by Copilot could have a more direct negative impact than ChatGPT which only suggests. For example, if Copilot in Excel mis-identifies outliers and removes valid data, and a user trusts it blindly, it could lead to faulty analysis. Or Copilot might generate a PowerPoint that inadvertently includes some confidential detail because it had access to internal docs; if the user isn’t careful, that could be shared. These are manageable issues (with user review and governance), but they underline that Copilot’s action-oriented nature means errors can propagate quickly if not caught. ChatGPT’s errors are usually confined to the chat until a human copies them out.

• Learning Limitations: Copilot doesn’t explain things unless prompted in that way. For learning or understanding fundamentals, ChatGPT might be more helpful. For example, Copilot will give you the formula or the chart, but if you ask “why did you choose this approach?” it might not have a meaningful answer beyond perhaps referencing data (except the Copilot Chat which can explain code if asked). ChatGPT, conversely, is eager to delve into “why” and alternate approaches. So for those who want to deepen their own skills, ChatGPT is sometimes a better mentor, whereas Copilot is more of a doer.

• Still Evolving: Copilot features are new (most rolled out in 2023-2024), and there might be kinks. For example, early users of Copilot in Power BI reported it might not handle very complex multi-table queries perfectly, or Excel Copilot might occasionally produce a Python snippet that times out for large data. These will improve, but as a weakness: it’s not battle-tested over years like some individual tools. ChatGPT has had more exposure to diverse queries (hundreds of millions of users trying edge cases), potentially making it more robust in handling weird inputs.

Ideal Use Cases for Microsoft Copilot

Microsoft Copilot is best utilized when a user is working within the Microsoft ecosystem and wants to supercharge their productivity on specific tasks. Some ideal scenarios:

• Excel-based Analysis for Business Users: A sales analyst who lives in Excel can use Copilot to instantly generate reports, explore data, and create visuals without writing complex formulas or code. It’s ideal for recurring tasks like monthly dashboards, where Copilot can automate large parts of the setup and analysis each time.

• Power BI Insights for Decision Makers: A manager who needs answers from the company’s BI data but isn’t proficient in Power BI can simply ask Copilot questions and get charts and interpretations. In a meeting, they could use Copilot to drive a data exploration live (“Which region had the lowest growth? Why might that be?” and Copilot can show the data and a brief insight).

• Coding Assistance in Development: Practically every developer working on company code can benefit from GitHub Copilot to speed up routine coding and reduce syntax errors. For data scientists writing analysis scripts or machine learning models, Copilot helps with API usage and boilerplate (e.g., quickly creating a plot or a scikit-learn pipeline). It’s ideal for those who are already coding but want to do it faster and with fewer Googling breaks.

• Report Generation and Writing: When writing documents like financial summaries, research briefs, or project updates, Copilot in Word can pull in relevant data (from, say, an Excel table or past reports via Graph) and draft well-structured content. This is perfect for analysts who know their material but want to save time on narrative writing. They can then tweak the tone or content as needed, but Copilot gives a strong starting draft.

• Email and Communication Automation: For those drowning in data-related communications (like an analyst who has to email different stakeholders insights, or answer repetitive questions about metrics), Copilot in Outlook and Teams can automate responses and summaries. For example, if someone emails “Can I get an update on KPI X?”, Copilot could draft a response pulling the latest number from a report and even attaching a chart – something ChatGPT cannot do because it doesn’t have that integration with live systems.

• When Data Security is Paramount: If a use-case involves sensitive data (financial records, personal info, proprietary research), and the organization doesn’t want that data leaving its environment, Copilot (running on Azure with enterprise controls) is the go-to. ChatGPT would be ruled out in those cases unless an enterprise self-hosted approach is used (which currently, not available for GPT-4 except via Azure API with careful implementation). Copilot allows leveraging AI on confidential data with audit logs and assurances it’s not used to train the model.

In essence, ChatGPT-4o is like a genius consultant you can ask anything, particularly useful for one-off questions, creative problem-solving, and learning, whereas Microsoft Copilot is like an efficient executive assistant integrated into your team, excelling at performing tasks and fetching insights in the tools you use every day.

For a data analyst, the ideal setup might be to use ChatGPT for brainstorming approaches or learning new techniques, and use Copilot to execute the chosen approach and handle the heavy lifting in production tools. For example, an analyst might ask ChatGPT, “What’s the best way to forecast sales given seasonality?” ChatGPT suggests a method like SARIMA vs. Prophet model, discusses pros/cons. The analyst decides on a method, then in Excel Copilot with Python, they say “Use Prophet to forecast next year’s sales based on this data” and Copilot writes/executes that code in Excel, producing the result in a report. This way, ChatGPT provided strategic guidance, and Copilot provided implementation – a powerful combination.

Finally... it’s worth noting these tools are rapidly evolving. By late 2025 or beyond, we might see these distinctions blur (perhaps ChatGPT gets more integrated, or Microsoft Copilot expands beyond MS apps). But as of mid-2025, users have a rich toolkit: ChatGPT-4o for broad AI assistance and Microsoft Copilot for specialized, context-aware productivity, and leveraging each for what it does best will yield the greatest benefit in data analysis workflows.

__________

FOLLOW US FOR MORE.

DATA STUDIOS

datastudios.org