ChatGPT vs Microsoft Copilot for Outlook Email: The Real Differences for Your Inbox in 2025

Professionals using Outlook in 2025 are focused on results: they want to handle long email threads quickly, extract the gist from attachments without extra clicks, and send replies that sound natural, not robotic. The main issue isn’t whether AI works, but which tool—Microsoft Copilot or ChatGPT—actually makes a day of emails easier. The debate now comes down to three real factors: Which one truly saves time inside Outlook? How seamless is each option when you’re dealing with threads, files, and meetings? And is the price justified by what you get in daily use?

How Copilot and ChatGPT Work Inside Outlook

Outlook power users face a repetitive cycle: summarizing long threads, digging through attachments, composing replies under pressure, and setting up meetings from ongoing conversations. Copilot and ChatGPT are both designed to streamline these workflows, but they do it in different ways.

Microsoft Copilot is now tightly built into Outlook for anyone with the right Microsoft 365 plan and the Copilot add-on. When you open a lengthy thread, Copilot automatically analyzes the entire conversation and produces a summary that is more than just a block of text—it’s broken into clickable bullet points that take you directly to relevant emails. This alone saves time for anyone jumping into a conversation late or prepping for a meeting.

Attachments are another pain point in Outlook, and Copilot’s approach is direct: when you receive a Word document, PDF, or PowerPoint file, Copilot can summarize it instantly right inside the reading pane. No more downloading files or switching apps. As of June–August 2025, this attachment summarization is rolling out in stages, so availability may vary depending on your account and region. When you want to draft a reply, Copilot gives you tone and length sliders and can even rewrite your message for clarity. A new coaching pane actively suggests improvements as you write, and when an email exchange turns into a meeting request, Copilot assembles the invite, agenda, and recipient list in a single step.

ChatGPT, by contrast, lives outside Outlook and is accessed through add-ins (like MailMaestro) or via automations (such as Zapier flows). To summarize an email thread, you either use an add-in or manually copy and paste the conversation into ChatGPT. The resulting summary is usually helpful but lacks Outlook-native navigation or clickable references. Drafting and rewriting replies with ChatGPT is flexible—you can request any tone or style—but the process is either prompt-driven or handled by a plug-in’s interface. Summarizing attachments is less streamlined: you need to download the file, upload it to ChatGPT, and then prompt for a summary. Creating meeting invites isn’t built in, so you’ll either handle it manually or use a custom automation.

Key Outlook task	Microsoft Copilot – native & one-click	ChatGPT via add-ins/automations
Summarize email threads	Built-in, clickable references	Copy-paste or add-in button
Summarize attachments	Native, supports Word/PDF/PPT (staged rollout Jun–Aug 2025)	Manual download ► upload
Draft replies	Tone, length, and style sliders	Prompt-based; varies by add-in
Rewrite or coach tone	Real-time suggestions as you type	Prompt-based or add-in rewrite
Schedule meetings from thread	Auto-creates invite with agenda	Needs automation or manual entry

Summarizing Long Email Threads

With Microsoft Copilot, the summary experience is seamlessly built into Outlook itself. When viewing a long conversation, users see a prominent “Summary by Copilot” button at the top. By clicking it, Copilot instantly provides a concise, paragraph-style overview of the key points discussed throughout the thread. Each summary is broken into clickable bullet points—so if you need to reference the exact message where something was mentioned, you simply click and jump to it. There’s no need for tedious scrolling or copy-pasting to find details. This makes it much easier to join conversations late or brief yourself before responding.

Using ChatGPT-powered add-ins is a different process. With tools like MailMaestro, you can use a “Summarize” button that sends the email thread to ChatGPT and returns a summary, usually displayed in a sidebar or pop-up. However, these summaries do not offer deep links back to specific emails in Outlook—they’re standalone text. If you use ChatGPT directly, you’ll need to copy the entire thread, paste it into the chat, and read the summary in a separate window or tab, then flip back and forth as needed. For some, this flexibility is useful, but it’s less integrated and requires more manual effort.

Summarizing Attachments Like Word, PDF, and PowerPoint

Copilot’s native attachment preview is being rolled out so that when you open an email with a document attached, you’ll see a “Summarize a file” button directly in the reading pane. You can get a condensed version of the file’s contents—whether it’s a Word doc, PowerPoint, or PDF—without leaving Outlook or opening the attachment in a separate program. This is especially valuable for professionals who deal with dense reports, long presentations, or legal contracts, letting them get the key facts immediately and even ask Copilot follow-up questions right inside the email client.

By contrast, ChatGPT users must still download the attachment, upload it to ChatGPT (either through a web interface or via an add-in’s upload panel), and then request a summary. Even with a plug-in, the summary is shown in a separate window, not embedded within the Outlook experience. For occasional use, this can work, but if you routinely review multiple attachments every day, the extra steps can slow you down.

Drafting Replies With the Right Tone and Length

When you use Copilot to draft email replies, you have access to tone and length sliders as well as an optional text box for additional instructions. You can specify that you want a response that is “formal,” “friendly,” or “concise,” and Copilot generates a draft that fits your needs. If you’re not satisfied, you can adjust the sliders or prompt and generate a new draft until it’s just right. This level of control is especially appreciated by users who want to maintain a consistent voice in their emails or quickly adapt to different professional scenarios.

ChatGPT-based add-ins and automations offer a different style of control. Instead of sliders, you rely on prompt-driven drafting. For instance, you might enter a command like “Write a short, upbeat reply confirming Tuesday’s meeting.” This approach provides maximum creative freedom, which is great for power users and those comfortable experimenting with prompts. However, it often means more back-and-forth between different panes or windows—unless you’ve configured an add-in with embedded controls.

Rewriting or Getting Coaching on Tone

Copilot’s real-time coaching pane is built into the Outlook compose window. As you write or edit your message, Copilot analyzes your text for clarity, tone, and conciseness, flagging issues like wordiness or suggesting simpler alternatives. If your message comes across as too blunt or too vague, Copilot alerts you and offers more neutral or specific alternatives. This feature is extremely helpful for anyone who drafts sensitive communications or wants to ensure professionalism without sounding stiff.

With ChatGPT, you can request a rewrite on demand by copying your draft into the chat and instructing it to “rewrite this shorter,” “make this more polite,” or “clarify the tone.” Some add-ins make this a single click, but the workflow is still less integrated than Copilot’s; you’re usually copying text out, waiting for a response, and pasting it back. This flexibility is powerful, but it adds steps, especially if you need quick, in-place feedback.

Scheduling a Meeting Straight From a Thread

Copilot streamlines meeting scheduling by providing an “auto-schedule meeting” command within the email thread. When clicked, it analyzes the conversation, collects participants, proposes times based on everyone’s calendars, and builds an agenda for the invite. Everything happens inside Outlook, making it a true one-stop solution for turning discussions into actionable meetings. For professionals who regularly coordinate with teams or clients, this is a significant time-saver.

With ChatGPT, the assistant can help you draft the content of a meeting invite by generating the appropriate text or agenda. However, you still need to manually enter the invite in Outlook or set up a separate automation using tools like Zapier. There are templates that can push details from flagged emails into a calendar event, but they require setup and are not as seamless or tightly connected to the conversation as Copilot’s built-in tools.

__________

Pricing and Real-World Time Savings

The difference in cost is clear: Copilot is $30 per user per month as a Microsoft 365 add-on (the 300-user minimum was removed in January 2024), while ChatGPT Plus is $20 per user per month (with add-in or automation fees on top). The bigger question is whether those prices pay off in actual time saved.

For those working through dozens of Outlook actions daily, Copilot’s one-click workflow for summaries, file previews, reply drafting, and meeting scheduling adds up fast. Internal studies by Microsoft and recent pilot deployments (such as the UK Civil Service) suggest that regular Copilot users can reclaim around 26 minutes per day on average by eliminating manual steps and clicks for summaries, attachment reviews, and fast drafting. This figure replaces the earlier per-task second estimates, and is currently the most widely cited benchmark for Copilot time savings.

ChatGPT Plus can deliver savings too, especially for users who only need help occasionally or who want to customize every response. But the time lost to copying content, switching windows, and manually uploading files often narrows the time advantage—unless you’re using automations tailored to your exact workflow. For small businesses, freelancers, or those who want creative flexibility, the lower monthly cost makes sense, though the practical gains may be smaller for heavy Outlook users.

Plan / Metric	Microsoft Copilot	ChatGPT Plus + Outlook add-in
Subscription price (user / month)	$30 (add-on to Microsoft 365)	$20 (ChatGPT Plus) + any add-in fees
Documented average time saved¹	~26 min per day	Lower, varies by workflow and manual steps
Per-task second-based time savings	Internal estimate only	Not officially published

¹ UK Civil Service Copilot pilot, published May 2025.

The time difference grows with volume: anyone fielding complex, high-traffic inboxes will feel Copilot’s deeper integration almost immediately, while occasional users may still favor ChatGPT’s flexibility.

What Real-World Use Looks Like

In practice, Copilot users describe the tool as a natural part of Outlook. Summaries pop up as needed, attachment insights are delivered instantly (or soon, as rollouts complete), and meetings can be scheduled without jumping between menus. The coaching pane’s live writing tips help keep responses sharp and professional. Many organizations value that Copilot is centrally managed and consistent across all users, reducing both IT headaches and training requirements.

But the experience isn’t perfect. Some find Copilot’s auto-generated replies too stiff or formal for customer-facing or creative roles. The price tag is also a sticking point for teams that don’t rely on Outlook as their core communication tool.

ChatGPT stands out for its adaptability and tone control. Users who like fine-tuning responses, working across different platforms, or building custom automations appreciate what ChatGPT offers—especially at a lower starting price. Many freelancers and small businesses prefer the freedom to prompt and personalize replies, or to link email tasks to other business apps. The trade-off is more manual effort: extra clicks, copy-paste steps, and the occasional workflow glitch. Some users solve this with tailored automations, but for many, Copilot’s always-on integration remains smoother, especially as the inbox load increases.

Security, Compliance, and Control: What Users and IT Need to Know

For both individuals and companies, especially those in regulated industries or with strict data handling rules, security and compliance are not afterthoughts—they’re non-negotiable. Here, the differences between Copilot and ChatGPT become especially clear.

Microsoft Copilot benefits from living inside the Microsoft 365 ecosystem. All data—emails, summaries, attachments—remains within your organization’s secure tenant. Copilot uses Microsoft’s enterprise-grade security, including data loss prevention (DLP), audit logs, encryption, and regional data boundary options (crucial for organizations with GDPR or sector-specific compliance needs). IT admins retain central control: they can set permissions, monitor usage, and roll out features gradually across teams. Copilot’s operations are covered by Microsoft’s SOC 2, ISO 27001, and other major compliance certifications, meaning the tool can be used in finance, healthcare, government, and similar sectors with high security requirements.

ChatGPT, especially when accessed via third-party add-ins or automations, can have a different security profile. When you send content (like an email thread or file) to ChatGPT through an add-in, the data often leaves your Microsoft environment and is processed on external servers (e.g., OpenAI’s or the add-in provider’s cloud infrastructure). Many reputable add-ins advertise SOC 2 compliance and strong encryption, but the location and retention of data may be outside your direct control. For individual users or small teams, this isn’t always an issue. But for organizations with sensitive client data, legal obligations, or board-level security policies, it’s a real consideration.

Anecdotally, organizations in Germany, France, and Italy have shown a strong preference for Copilot precisely because of the tighter integration and oversight Microsoft provides. Small businesses and freelancers, on the other hand, may prioritize workflow flexibility or cost over enterprise-grade compliance.

Integrations Beyond Outlook: Extending Productivity Across Your Workflow

A growing question for any AI assistant is, “How well does this work with the other tools I rely on every day?” In 2025, email is only part of the workflow; chat apps like Teams and Slack, document storage, project management platforms, and mobile access are equally important.

Microsoft Copilot is built to shine in the Microsoft 365 universe. It’s not just in Outlook—you’ll find Copilot woven into Teams, Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and (increasingly) Power BI. This makes it easy to, for example, generate a report in Word based on an email conversation, schedule Teams meetings directly from an Outlook thread, or pull data from Excel into an email summary with almost no manual effort. For organizations deeply invested in Microsoft’s ecosystem, Copilot becomes a “hub” assistant—unifying workflows across devices and departments, including on mobile devices through the latest Outlook and Teams apps. Admins can manage all these integrations from one dashboard.

ChatGPT is all about versatility and cross-platform potential. With the right automations (Zapier, Make, or custom scripting), users can link ChatGPT not just to Outlook, but to nearly any platform—Slack, Trello, Salesforce, HubSpot, Google Drive, and more. Want to auto-summarize emails, push the summary to Slack, generate a customer support draft in Zendesk, or trigger a workflow in your CRM? ChatGPT can make it happen, though setting up these integrations often requires more hands-on effort and some technical knowledge. Mobile support is broad as well, since ChatGPT’s add-ins and web apps work on Android and iOS, though integration quality varies by vendor.

The real-world result: Copilot excels at creating a tightly managed, seamless experience for users and IT inside the Microsoft world, while ChatGPT offers more “out-of-the-box” integrations and customization for those with diverse or non-Microsoft stacks, provided they’re willing to invest time in setup and troubleshooting.

________

FOLLOW US FOR MORE.

DATA STUDIOS

datastudios.org