ChatGPT vs Microsoft Copilot vs Claude vs Gemini: Full Report and Comparison. Accuracy, Speed, Interface, Integrations, Pricing, Enterprise Tools, Multimodal Support, Availability, and Unique Features

ChatGPT, Microsoft 365 Copilot, Claude, and Google Gemini are four leading AI conversational platforms as of mid-2025.

Each is backed by a major player (OpenAI, Microsoft, Anthropic, and Google, respectively) and has evolved rapidly with new features and improvements. This report compares them across key aspects to highlight their strengths, differences, and unique innovations. All information is up-to-date as of June 2025.

Summary Comparison Table

Aspect	ChatGPT (OpenAI)	Microsoft 365 Copilot	Claude (Anthropic)	Gemini (Google DeepMind)
Accuracy & Reasoning	Excellent reasoning with GPT-4; very coherent and creative in responses. May occasionally hallucinate incorrect facts.	High accuracy for work tasks (powered by GPT-4, answers are often grounded in user’s data like documents & emails for factuality).	Very detailed and logical; excels at long, complex reasoning (large context window). Tends to follow instructions closely (fewer off-topic tangents).	Robust logical reasoning; real-time knowledge via Google Search means up-to-date answers. In some tests, matches or surpasses GPT-4 in accuracy.
Performance (Speed)	Moderate – GPT-4 responds in a few seconds (slower than lighter models). Free tier uses a faster GPT-3.5 variant for quick replies.	Moderate – Similar to ChatGPT’s GPT-4 speed. Slight delays possible when processing large Office files or emails; generally real-time for typical requests.	Dual modes – near-instant responses for simple queries, and an “extended reasoning” mode for complex tasks (trades speed for depth). Overall fast for most prompts.	Adjustable – offers model sizes for speed vs. power. “Flash” model is optimized for fast answers, while “Ultra” prioritizes depth (with longer response time). In normal use, responses are prompt.
User Interface & Usability	Clean web & mobile chat interface. Supports conversation history, model switching, and tool buttons (voice, browsing). Despite many features, it remains user-friendly.	Embedded UI inside Microsoft apps (Copilot appears as a sidebar or chat in Word, Excel, Outlook, Teams, etc.). No separate app needed—prompts are typed within the tools you’re already using.	Minimalist chat UI (Claude.ai web and Claude app) with just a prompt box and options to choose model or tone. Allows attaching files for analysis; very straightforward.	Accessible via Google Gemini web interface, with a simple prompt box and answer area. Also integrated into Google’s ecosystem—AI results appear in Search, and Duet AI in Workspace apps adds a familiar sidebar.
Integrations & Compatibility	OpenAI API plus ChatGPT Plugins enable connecting to external tools and real-time data. Many third-party platforms (Slack, Zapier, browsers) offer ChatGPT integrations.	Deeply integrated with Microsoft 365 and Windows. Uses Microsoft Graph to pull context from email, calendar, files, etc. Supports Graph Connectors to incorporate external data sources; tied into Bing for web info.	Available through API (also on AWS Bedrock and Google Vertex AI). Official Slack bot and other integrations. Large-file uploads make it compatible with document workflows.	Native to Google’s ecosystem: powers Gemini and Workspace’s Duet AI, and available via Vertex AI API. Can integrate with user’s Google data (Drive, Calendar) for personalized help; increasingly woven into Android and Assistant.
Pricing Models	Free tier (GPT-3.5). ChatGPT Plus $20/mo for GPT-4. ChatGPT Pro $200/mo for advanced, unlimited use. Team plans ~$25–30/user/mo; Enterprise ~$60/user/mo. API usage billed separately.	No free consumer version. Microsoft 365 Copilot add-on: $30/user/mo for business and enterprise customers (requires M365 subscription). Bing Chat is free but less capable.	Free tier (~50 messages/8 h). Claude Pro $20/mo for higher limits and priority. Claude Max $100+ for power users (Opus model). Team ~$30/user/mo; enterprise and API plans available.	Free via Gemini. Google One AI Premium $20/mo for Gemini Ultra access. Duet AI for Workspace $30/user/mo. Cloud API usage pay-as-you-go.
Enterprise Features	ChatGPT Enterprise offers privacy/security (no training on your data, SOC 2 compliance, encryption). Admin console for SSO, usage stats, shared templates, Connectors to internal tools, unlimited high-speed GPT-4 and Advanced Data Analysis.	Honors existing Microsoft permissions, keeps data within the tenant, GDPR compliant. Admin Copilot Control panel, audit logging, data residency, and customizable Copilot Studio for bespoke agents and workflows.	Secure deployments via AWS, Azure, or GCP; data not retained for training. Huge context window supports large knowledge bases. Tool-use capabilities and customizable filters; fine-tuning via API.	Enterprise access via Google Cloud and Workspace. Data privacy by default; admin controls manage data scope. Offers indemnification, compliance, and fine-tuning on private data.
Multimodal Input Support	Yes. Accepts image uploads and can analyze them; supports voice conversations (speak and listen) in mobile apps.	Partial. Primarily text-based; can generate charts and graphics in Office apps and summarize meeting transcripts, but cannot directly analyze arbitrary images or audio files.	No (text-only). Does not support image or audio inputs. Handles text file attachments for analysis.	Yes. Built natively for multimodality—processes text, images, and audio. Gemini lets users upload images; some Gemini models can generate images or audio as outputs.
Availability	Available in most countries (150+ regions). Supports 90+ languages. Platforms: web, iOS, Android, API.	Available to Microsoft 365 business customers in many regions; supports 30+ interface languages. Integrated across desktop, web, and mobile Office apps.	Available in North America and Europe via web, iOS app, and API/partner integrations. Strong fluency in major European languages.	Available in 230+ countries, 40+ languages. Accessible on web (Gemini) and integrated across Google services; API via Google Cloud.
Unique Features & Innovations	Plugins & Tools, Advanced Data Analysis, voice + vision interaction, huge community ecosystem.	Embedded actionable AI within Office apps, deep Graph context, Copilot Studio for custom workflows, real-time meeting summaries.	Huge context window, Constitutional AI safety approach, autonomous tool use, careful reasoning.	**Full multimodality, built-in real-time search, native Google ecosystem integration, ability to generate images/audio, advanced planning capabilities.

(Table legend: GPT-4o refers to OpenAI’s GPT-4 model; GPT-4.1 mini refers to a faster lightweight GPT-4 variant; context window = amount of text the model can consider at once.)

_____________

Accuracy and Reasoning Capabilities

• ChatGPT (OpenAI): ChatGPT is known for its strong reasoning abilities and coherent answers. The latest model (GPT-4) handles complex, multi-part instructions with high accuracy and nuance. It excels at producing creative and contextually relevant text, often giving detailed explanations. However, like any large language model, it can occasionally hallucinate – confidently stating incorrect information or nonexistent facts. OpenAI has improved factuality over time, but users still need to double-check critical outputs. Overall, for general knowledge and logical reasoning tasks, ChatGPT (especially with GPT-4) is considered state-of-the-art in 2025.

• Microsoft 365 Copilot: Microsoft Copilot inherits the reasoning strength of OpenAI’s GPT-4, since that model underpins many of Copilot’s capabilities. In practice, Copilot is very accurate at tasks like summarizing a document or answering questions about your data, because it grounds its responses in your content (emails, files, etc.). This grounding reduces random mistakes – for example, if you ask for quarterly sales figures, Copilot will pull from your actual spreadsheets rather than guessing. Its reasoning is tuned for productivity scenarios: it follows instructions to draft texts or analyze data in a straightforward manner. Copilot will generally avoid open-ended creative speculation (it’s more factual), and it abides by organizational security (won’t reveal info you don’t have access to). In summary, Copilot’s accuracy on work-specific queries is high, and for general knowledge it performs on par with GPT-4. (It may occasionally refuse queries that fall outside of workplace contexts or company policies, as it’s designed to stay “enterprise-safe.”)

• Claude (Anthropic): Claude is praised for detailed and thoughtful reasoning. Its responses tend to be comprehensive and well-structured, often going the extra mile to explain the “why” behind answers. Anthropic has tuned Claude to be helpful and not take shortcuts in logic. In fact, the latest Claude 4 models (Claude Opus 4 and Claude Sonnet 4) set new standards in advanced reasoning, according to Anthropic. One advantage Claude has is an enormous context window – it can remember and reason over hundreds of pages of text, which means it can draw connections and insights from a lot of information at once. This makes it less likely to lose track of context in long conversations or analyses. Users often find Claude’s answers measured and less prone to hallucination on factual queries (though it’s not immune to errors). Its “Constitutional AI” training (following guiding principles) can sometimes make it refuse to engage in tricky topics, but generally that helps it avoid illogical or unsafe outputs. Overall, Claude’s reasoning style is thorough, cautious, and excellent for complex analytical tasks.

• Gemini (Google): Google’s Gemini has rapidly become a top performer in accuracy and reasoning. In internal evaluations, Gemini’s largest model (“Ultra”) was the first to exceed human-level scores on certain academic benchmarks (e.g., ~90 % on MMLU), edging out GPT-4 in those tests. In practical use, Gemini demonstrates very robust logical reasoning – it’s able to break down problems into steps and often provides clear, well-structured answers. A key strength is that Gemini has real-time access to information: it can search the web by default, so it uses up-to-date facts in its reasoning. This means it’s less likely to make mistakes about recent events (whereas other models might be limited by outdated training data). Users have noticed that Gemini’s answers tend to be concise and fact-focused (likely a result of training on Google’s factual knowledge). It may sometimes lack the creative flourish of ChatGPT in storytelling, but for accuracy and logic it is extremely powerful. In blind tests and head-to-head comparisons, Gemini often matches or even surpasses GPT-4-level performance on complex queries, marking it as an AI on the cutting edge of reasoning capability.

_____________

Performance and Response Time

• ChatGPT: In terms of speed, ChatGPT provides near real-time responses for most queries, but the exact performance depends on the model being used. The GPT-3.5 model (used for free users and as a fast “Turbo” option) is very quick—it can usually draft a response almost instantly or within a second or two for short prompts. The more advanced GPT-4 model is slower: there’s typically a noticeable pause (a few seconds) before it starts responding, especially for longer or complex prompts. As the reply length grows, GPT-4 will take longer to complete the output. OpenAI has mitigated this somewhat by introducing a faster, lightweight version of GPT-4 for the ChatGPT free tier, which sacrifices a bit of depth for speed. Still, when using ChatGPT Plus with the full GPT-4, users should expect a brief wait for the model to “think” on complex tasks. Once generation begins, it streams out text at a reasonable pace. In summary, ChatGPT’s performance is generally good, with the trade-off that the most powerful mode (GPT-4) is a bit slower. For many casual uses the speed is more than sufficient, but in time-sensitive scenarios GPT-3.5 might be preferred for its snappier replies.

• Microsoft 365 Copilot: Microsoft Copilot’s response time is comparable to ChatGPT’s, since it leverages the same underlying GPT-4 model in the cloud. When you ask Copilot a question in Word or Teams, it usually takes a few seconds to process and then starts streaming out an answer. The latency might be slightly affected by the need to retrieve context—for example, if you ask “Summarize this 10-page document,” Copilot first has to fetch and interpret that document’s content from Microsoft Graph before formulating a summary. In general, simple queries (like “Rewrite this paragraph”) feel almost instantaneous, whereas very large requests (like analyzing a lengthy spreadsheet) could take longer. Microsoft has likely optimized Copilot to use caching and other tricks for performance, but users may occasionally notice it “working on” a complex task. It’s also worth noting that Copilot runs within enterprise data centers under heavy security, so there might be minor overhead compared to the public ChatGPT. Overall, Copilot’s performance is solid for interactive use—it’s rare to be left waiting long. If it does need more time (for example, generating a full slide deck from a prompt), it often will produce partial results progressively.

• Claude: Claude’s performance is quite impressive, especially in the newest version. Anthropic designed Claude 4 with two modes of operation: a fast mode and a deep-thinking mode. In many simple or moderate queries, Claude can generate answers very quickly—often as fast as or faster than ChatGPT. This is because Claude’s “Sonnet” model (the default for most queries) is optimized for speed while still being fairly capable. Users on the free tier or Claude Pro often report that Claude starts responding almost immediately for short prompts. When tasks get more complex, Claude can invoke an “extended reasoning” mode (sometimes behind the scenes) where it takes a bit longer, carefully working through the problem (this might happen if you ask it to write a long report or solve a hard coding task). In that case, it deliberately slows down to think step-by-step, which improves quality at the cost of speed. One notable feature: Claude has an extremely large context window, and it’s capable of ingesting huge inputs—processing such large texts might naturally take more time (but it’s doing much more work in those cases). For everyday interactions, Claude feels snappy. Anthropic also provides priority CPU time to paying customers (Claude Pro), which further improves responsiveness during peak demand. In conclusion, Claude strikes a good balance: it’s fast for lightweight queries (often near-instant) and able to handle heavyweight queries with more deliberation when needed.

• Gemini: Gemini’s performance varies slightly with the model tier being used, but it’s designed to be highly responsive. Google has a range of Gemini models deployed: Gemini Flash (and even a Flash-Lite) is a distilled, speed-optimized model for quick interactions. When Gemini is handling a simple query using a smaller model, it can reply almost immediately. For more complex queries or when users have access to the larger Gemini Pro or Ultra models (for example via a premium tier), the response might start after a brief pause of a few seconds, similar to GPT-4’s behavior. Generally, Gemini in its default consumer setting feels very fast—Google’s infrastructure advantage means it can handle lots of requests in parallel and scale up as needed. If Gemini has to produce a very long, detailed answer (or especially if it’s generating an image or doing a live web search in the background), that can introduce some delay, but the system usually streams partial results so the user sees progress. One of Gemini’s unique aspects is concurrency—it can use tool integration (like search) without too much slow-down because Google’s systems handle that efficiently in parallel. In summary, Gemini offers excellent performance. The “speed vs. detail” choice is managed by model selection: Flash for near-instant answers, Ultra for thoroughness. In everyday usage through Gemini, most users experience quick, timely answers from Gemini with little waiting around.

_____________

User Interface and Usability

• ChatGPT: ChatGPT provides a conversational chat interface that feels intuitive and friendly for users. On the web, it’s essentially a messaging layout—you type into a text box at the bottom and the AI’s replies appear as chat bubbles above. The design is clean and minimal, which lowers the barrier for new users (no technical knowledge needed to start a conversation). Over time, OpenAI has added features without cluttering the UI: for example, there are options to toggle between models (if you have access to GPT-4 vs. 3.5), a sidebar to browse your past conversations, and buttons to enable tools like browsing or plugins. Even with these extras, most users find ChatGPT very easy to use, as it’s just Q&A in a chat format. The availability of official mobile apps (iOS and Android) further enhances usability—on those, you can even use voice input and hear spoken responses, making interaction hands-free. ChatGPT also allows copying answers, sharing links to conversations, and other convenient functions. One minor aspect is that because ChatGPT offers many advanced tools (code interpreter, plugins, etc.), the interface has a few more toggles and menus compared to a bare-bones chatbot. But these are well-organized, so the core chat experience remains straightforward. Overall, ChatGPT’s UI is polished and user-friendly, suitable for both casual users and professionals.

• Microsoft 365 Copilot: Microsoft has taken a different approach by embedding Copilot within existing applications rather than creating an entirely new interface. Usability-wise, this means if you’re in Word, you see a Copilot sidebar; if you’re in Teams, Copilot might appear as an extra chat pane or a prompt during meetings, and so on. There isn’t a standalone “Copilot app”; instead, it’s contextually integrated. This is powerful for usability in a work setting: you don’t need to switch windows or copy-paste content—Copilot is already there in the tool you’re using. For example, in Word you can click a Copilot icon and ask for a summary of the document, and the answer appears in that sidebar with options to apply changes directly to the document. The interface is text-driven: you ask questions or give commands in natural language. It’s designed to feel like a helpful assistant sitting next to you in Office. Since it’s within familiar software, most users find it intuitive to try. There is also a unified Copilot Chat experience available for businesses (accessible in tools like Microsoft Teams or a browser) which allows multi-turn conversations with the AI spanning your work data. In all incarnations, Copilot maintains a simple chat UI: a text box and the AI response window. In summary, Microsoft 365 Copilot is very usable for those already in the Microsoft ecosystem—it feels like a natural extension of the apps.

• Claude: Claude’s user interface is minimal and straightforward by design. Anthropic offers Claude through a web client and a mobile app, both of which keep things very simple: you have a big text box to type your prompt, and Claude’s responses appear above it in a chat thread. There are a few neat features—for example, you can choose from different models or modes via a dropdown, and you can set a desired tone or style for responses—but these options are tucked away; the main experience is just chatting. Claude’s interface lets you attach files to your prompt (like sending a PDF or text file for Claude to analyze), which is very handy for tasks such as summarizing a document. There’s no flashy formatting or rich media in Claude’s UI: it’s text-in, text-out, which actually makes it quite user-friendly—there’s almost no learning curve. Users have noted that Claude’s conversations can handle very long context, and the UI is good at letting you scroll back through large transcripts without lag. Overall, Claude offers a clean, no-frills chat experience that prioritizes clarity and ease of use.

• Gemini: Google’s Gemini is accessed via gemini.google.com, which is a web-based chat very similar to ChatGPT’s in layout. If you go there, you see a friendly prompt area where you can type a question, and it will give you an answer in a chat bubble. The Gemini page emphasizes simplicity—it uses Google’s Material Design, so it feels like a modern Google product. Gemini also allows useful actions like editing your question after the fact and regenerating responses. A unique UI element is that Gemini can show multiple drafts of an answer—you can toggle and see alternative phrasing or approaches to the question. Because Gemini is tied to your Google account, it can optionally personalize or incorporate your Google data (with permission). In terms of platform, Gemini is currently web-first—there isn’t a dedicated mobile app, though it works through mobile web or the Google app. Google has begun integrating Gemini’s capabilities into other UIs: for example, Google Search now sometimes shows an AI snapshot at the top of results, and Google Workspace apps have an AI sidebar for assistance. Overall, Gemini’s user experience is smooth and aligned with Google’s ecosystem: it’s easy to use on the standalone Gemini site for general purposes, and it is cleverly integrated where Google can add value, making it approachable to a vast audience.

_____________

Integrations and Compatibility with Tools/Platforms

• ChatGPT (OpenAI): ChatGPT’s reach has expanded far beyond its own interface thanks to strong integration options. The primary method is through the OpenAI API, which lets developers embed ChatGPT’s models (like GPT-4 or GPT-3.5) into their own applications, websites, or products. This has led to ChatGPT appearing in customer-support bots, productivity suites, learning platforms, and countless other services. OpenAI also introduced a Plugins system for ChatGPT, allowing the AI to call external tools and data sources in real time—anything from web browsing and database lookups to booking flights or controlling IoT devices. On the user side, there are official and third-party integrations such as a ChatGPT app for Slack, browser extensions that surface ChatGPT as you search, and numerous low-code connectors (Zapier, Make) that tie ChatGPT into everyday workflows. All of this makes ChatGPT one of the most widely embedded AI assistants on the market.

• Microsoft 365 Copilot: Copilot is inherently integrated with the Microsoft 365 ecosystem. It works natively inside Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, Teams, OneNote, and other Office apps, using Microsoft Graph to pull context from emails, meetings, files, and chats. Beyond the core suite, Microsoft is extending Copilot concepts to Dynamics 365, Security Copilot, and other specialized domains, and it is available in Windows 11 as Windows Copilot. For third-party systems, companies can use Microsoft Graph Connectors so Copilot can securely query external data sources such as CRM systems or private knowledge bases. This tight integration with both Microsoft software and enterprise data makes Copilot exceptionally powerful for organizations already invested in the Microsoft stack.

• Claude (Anthropic): Claude is designed for flexibility through its API and is available on major cloud platforms like AWS Bedrock and Google Vertex AI. Businesses integrate Claude into customer-facing chatbots, internal knowledge tools, and specialized applications (e.g., legal document review) thanks to its large-context strength. There’s an official Claude Slack app that teams can install for brainstorming or summarizing discussions, and partners such as Notion and DuckDuckGo use Claude behind the scenes. Anthropic is rolling out a Model Connector Protocol for enterprises, letting Claude securely access internal tools or proprietary databases much like a plugin mechanism but fully controlled by IT. Because Claude can ingest very large text inputs, it meshes naturally with document-heavy workflows.

• Gemini (Google): Gemini’s integration depth comes from Google’s vast product ecosystem. It appears in Google Search as AI snapshots, and drives Duet AI features across Google Workspace apps (Docs, Gmail, Sheets, Slides, Meet). Gemini is also available via Vertex AI on Google Cloud, enabling developers to embed it in their own software or fine-tune it on private data. On mobile, Google is weaving Gemini into Android and Google Assistant, so voice queries can tap the same intelligence. With optional access to a user’s Drive files, Calendar events, or Gmail (with permissions), Gemini can deliver highly personalized assistance. This breadth of native and developer-friendly integrations makes Gemini ubiquitous wherever Google services run.

_____________

Integrations and Compatibility with Tools/Platforms

• ChatGPT (OpenAI): ChatGPT’s reach has expanded far beyond its own interface thanks to strong integration options. The primary method is through the OpenAI API, which lets developers embed ChatGPT’s models (like GPT-4 or GPT-3.5) into their own applications, websites, or products. This has led to ChatGPT appearing in customer-support bots, productivity suites, learning platforms, and countless other services. OpenAI also introduced a Plugins system for ChatGPT, allowing the AI to call external tools and data sources in real time—anything from web browsing and database lookups to booking flights or controlling IoT devices. On the user side, there are official and third-party integrations such as a ChatGPT app for Slack, browser extensions that surface ChatGPT as you search, and numerous low-code connectors (Zapier, Make) that tie ChatGPT into everyday workflows. All of this makes ChatGPT one of the most widely embedded AI assistants on the market.

• Microsoft 365 Copilot: Copilot is inherently integrated with the Microsoft 365 ecosystem. It works natively inside Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, Teams, OneNote, and other Office apps, using Microsoft Graph to pull context from emails, meetings, files, and chats. Beyond the core suite, Microsoft is extending Copilot concepts to Dynamics 365, Security Copilot, and other specialized domains, and it is available in Windows 11 as Windows Copilot. For third-party systems, companies can use Microsoft Graph Connectors so Copilot can securely query external data sources such as CRM systems or private knowledge bases. This tight integration with both Microsoft software and enterprise data makes Copilot exceptionally powerful for organizations already invested in the Microsoft stack.

• Claude (Anthropic): Claude is designed for flexibility through its API and is available on major cloud platforms like AWS Bedrock and Google Vertex AI. Businesses integrate Claude into customer-facing chatbots, internal knowledge tools, and specialized applications (e.g., legal document review) thanks to its large-context strength. There’s an official Claude Slack app that teams can install for brainstorming or summarizing discussions, and partners such as Notion and DuckDuckGo use Claude behind the scenes. Anthropic is rolling out a Model Connector Protocol for enterprises, letting Claude securely access internal tools or proprietary databases much like a plugin mechanism but fully controlled by IT. Because Claude can ingest very large text inputs, it meshes naturally with document-heavy workflows.

• Gemini (Google): Gemini’s integration depth comes from Google’s vast product ecosystem. It powers Bard (old name of this chatbot) for general chat, appears in Google Search as AI snapshots, and drives Duet AI features across Google Workspace apps (Docs, Gmail, Sheets, Slides, Meet). Gemini is also available via Vertex AI on Google Cloud, enabling developers to embed it in their own software or fine-tune it on private data. On mobile, Google is weaving Gemini into Android and Google Assistant, so voice queries can tap the same intelligence. With optional access to a user’s Drive files, Calendar events, or Gmail (with permissions), Gemini can deliver highly personalized assistance. This breadth of native and developer-friendly integrations makes Gemini ubiquitous wherever Google services run.

_____________

Support for Multimodal Input (Images, Audio, etc.)

• ChatGPT: ChatGPT has evolved into a multimodal assistant for Plus and Enterprise users. It now accepts image inputs—users can upload pictures and ask the model to analyze or describe them, read text in images (OCR), interpret charts, or identify objects. ChatGPT also supports voice conversations: on mobile apps, you can speak your prompt and listen to a spoken reply, enabling hands-free interaction. Beyond images and voice, its Advanced Data Analysis tool lets you upload files like CSVs or PDFs for in-chat analysis. It does not natively accept audio files for transcription nor generate images, but overall ChatGPT now “sees” and “speaks” in addition to reading and writing.

• Microsoft 365 Copilot: Copilot is largely text-based. Prompts are typed, and outputs are text or edits within Office documents. It indirectly handles other modalities—for example, in PowerPoint it can find and insert graphics, or in Teams it summarizes meetings from the live transcript. Windows Copilot (a Bing Chat variant) can analyze images, but that sits outside the core M365 Copilot. Directly feeding Copilot arbitrary images or audio files for analysis is not currently supported, and voice input relies on device speech-to-text rather than a Copilot voice mode.

• Claude: Claude remains text-only. It does not process images or audio natively. The interface allows file attachments, but those should be textual formats (PDF, TXT, etc.) for Claude to read and analyze. If you attach an image, Claude cannot understand its visual content. Likewise, Claude outputs only text—no synthesized voice, no generated images. Users can layer external speech-to-text or text-to-speech tools around Claude, yet multimodal support is not built into the model itself.

• Gemini (Google): Gemini was built multimodal from the start. It lets users upload images and Gemini will identify, describe, or reason about them. Gemini also integrates Google’s vision capabilities, so it can fetch or suggest relevant visuals. Audio features are emerging: Google is merging Gemini with Assistant for voice conversations, and some Gemini models can even generate audio or images as outputs. While video analysis is still experimental, Gemini’s native multimodal architecture positions it ahead of most rivals in handling diverse input and output types.

_____________

Availability (Countries, Language Support, Platforms)

• ChatGPT: ChatGPT is broadly available to users around the world via the web and mobile apps, though there are notable exceptions due to legal or policy constraints. Officially, OpenAI supports usage in more than 150 countries and regions. This includes North America, most of Europe, much of Asia (Japan, South Korea, India, etc.), South America, Australia, and many parts of Africa. Some countries—such as China, where the service is blocked, and certain sanctioned regions—cannot access OpenAI’s services. ChatGPT was temporarily paused in Italy in 2023 but returned after adding privacy safeguards. The model itself supports dozens of languages—English, Chinese, Spanish, French, German, Arabic, Portuguese, Russian, Japanese, Korean, and many more—though it is most fluent in English. Platform-wise, ChatGPT is accessible on the web (any modern browser), has official iOS and Android apps, and can be integrated via the OpenAI API into third-party software.

• Microsoft 365 Copilot: Copilot’s availability aligns with Microsoft 365 service regions. After an initial North-American preview, Microsoft has expanded Copilot to many regions including Europe, parts of Asia-Pacific, and other major markets, with staged rollouts to satisfy local regulations. Copilot supports more than 30 interface languages—English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Japanese, Chinese, Korean, Arabic, Hindi, and others—matching Office’s language coverage. It appears inside desktop Office apps on Windows and macOS, Office web apps, and mobile Office/Teams apps. Copilot is limited to licensed Microsoft 365 business and enterprise customers; there is no direct consumer version, though Windows Copilot and Bing Chat offer related functionality to the public.

• Claude: Claude’s reach is growing but remains more limited than ChatGPT or Gemini. Launched first in the United States, Claude expanded to the United Kingdom and later to Europe. As of mid-2025 it is officially available in North America and most European countries via the Claude.ai web client and an iOS app, with API access through cloud partners such as AWS Bedrock and Google Vertex AI. Anthropic has not yet rolled out Claude broadly in regions like East Asia or Latin America. While English is Claude’s strongest language, it shows strong fluency in major European languages such as French, German, Spanish, and Italian, and decent proficiency in others. Access is primarily through the web interface, the iOS app, Slack integration, and partner APIs.

• Gemini: Google’s Gemini is available in more than 230 countries and territories—essentially everywhere Google services operate, with a few exceptions (for example, where Google is blocked). It supports over 40 languages, including all major European, Asian, and Middle-Eastern tongues. Gemini is primarily accessed via the web at gemini.google.com, with mobile access through the Google app or any mobile browser. Gemini capabilities also surface across Google Search (AI snapshots), Google Workspace (Duet AI sidebar in Docs, Gmail, Sheets, etc.), and Android and Google Assistant integrations. Developers worldwide can call Gemini via the Vertex AI API, subject to standard Google Cloud regional policies.

_____________

Unique Features & Innovations

• ChatGPT (OpenAI): ChatGPT set the standard for conversational AI and continues to introduce innovative features. One of the most distinctive aspects of ChatGPT is its Plugin ecosystem. Plugins allow ChatGPT to call external tools—fetching real-time web data, querying databases, booking flights, or even controlling IoT devices—turning it from a static chatbot into an action-oriented platform. Another major innovation is Advanced Data Analysis (formerly Code Interpreter), where ChatGPT can execute Python code in a sandbox to solve problems, analyze files, and generate visualizations. On the user-interaction side, ChatGPT’s multimodal capabilities enable voice conversations and image understanding, making the assistant able to “see” and “speak.” Finally, the vast community around ChatGPT has created prompt libraries and extensions that continually expand what it can do, ensuring rapid evolution and versatility.

• Microsoft 365 Copilot: Microsoft’s Copilot stands out by being embedded directly inside productivity software. It can not only answer questions but execute actions in Office apps—drafting documents, editing spreadsheets, or designing slides on command. Copilot’s deep contextual awareness comes from Microsoft Graph, letting it reference emails, meetings, and files to ground its answers in your actual work data. Copilot Studio empowers organizations to build custom AI agents and workflows that tap internal systems, while real-time meeting features in Teams let Copilot generate summaries and action items on the fly. This blend of actionable AI with rich personal context is unique among today’s assistants.

• Claude (Anthropic): Claude’s headline feature is its massive context window—up to around 100,000 tokens—allowing it to digest entire books, lengthy contracts, or large knowledge bases in a single prompt. Anthropic’s Constitutional AI approach gives Claude a well-defined set of principles that guide safe and helpful responses, leading to polite, measured outputs and fewer toxic or off-topic answers. With the latest release, Claude gained autonomous tool-use abilities, enabling it to call web search or code-execution services mid-response without explicit user prompts. These innovations make Claude particularly strong for deep analysis, safety-conscious deployments, and tasks requiring huge volumes of text.

• Gemini (Google): Gemini was designed as a multimodal model from day one. It can ingest text, images, and audio and can even generate images or voice when needed. Its built-in real-time search connectivity means it taps Google Search automatically for up-to-date information, reducing factual errors about current events. Gemini also benefits from Google’s ecosystem, seamlessly integrating with Search, Maps, Android, and Workspace. On the research side, Gemini incorporates advanced planning and problem-solving techniques inspired by DeepMind’s work on strategic AI systems, hinting at stronger agent-like capabilities. This combination of multimodality, live knowledge, and deep integration makes Gemini a uniquely versatile platform.

_____________

FOLLOW US FOR MORE.

DATA STUDIOS

datastudios.org