Claude Opus 4 vs ChatGPT-4o for File Reading: Which AI Handles Documents More Effectively?
- Graziano Stefanelli
- Jun 17
- 5 min read

Modern AI assistants can do far more than chat—they can ingest contracts, pull insights from PDFs, and even interpret complex spreadsheets.
Two front-runners dominate this workflow today: Claude Opus 4 from Anthropic and ChatGPT-4o from OpenAI. Each excels at a different style of document work, so the best choice depends on what’s in your file and how you plan to use the results.
Claude Opus 4: Deep-Reading Power —with Built-in Vision
Massive context window. Claude Opus 4 leads the field with its enormous context window, able to process up to 200,000 tokens in a single session. To put that in perspective, this is equivalent to analyzing the content of an entire lengthy book—around 500 pages—without having to break it into chunks. This capability makes it uniquely suited for those who work with long and complex documents, such as legal contracts, policy whitepapers, compliance reports, academic research, or technical manuals. For enterprise or research use, Anthropic has also piloted 1-million-token sessions, pushing the boundaries of what’s possible with document AI today.
Multimodal by default. All Claude 4 models come with advanced vision features. This means that when you upload a document—whether it’s a PDF filled with images, technical diagrams, charts, or even scanned handwritten notes—Claude can interpret those visuals alongside the text. This is a major leap from traditional “text-only” AI: you can ask Claude to summarize key figures from a chart, interpret a complex workflow diagram, or reference elements from a photograph embedded in your report. It brings a new level of comprehension to document analysis, especially for business or scientific files where visuals are just as important as words.
Structure-aware comprehension A core strength of Claude is its ability to not just read, but deeply understand the organization and logic of complex documents. It recognizes headings, bullet lists, numbered sections, tables, footnotes, and cross-references, so it can follow instructions like, “Summarize only section 3,” or, “List every risk mentioned in the appendix.” This attention to structure makes Claude particularly valuable for professionals who need precise, targeted analysis—such as extracting obligations from a contract, listing action items in a meeting report, or mapping out the argument flow in a research paper.
Interface trade-off. Claude’s focus on deep analysis means it sacrifices some interface polish. Files are uploaded as attachments, and the platform does not offer a live, scrollable document viewer within the chat. Users interact with responses as plain text, prioritizing depth and fidelity of the analysis over interactive or graphical navigation. For some, this “no-nonsense” approach is perfect; others may miss the visual orientation provided by other platforms.
ChatGPT-4o (and GPT-4.1): Visual-First, Tool-Rich Workflows
Generous—though smaller—context. ChatGPT-4o, the leading model inside the consumer ChatGPT product, supports a context window of 128,000 tokens. This capacity enables the model to read and process multiple documents or very large files—often up to several hundred pages—in one conversation. While it falls short of Claude Opus 4’s upper limits, it is more than enough for the vast majority of business, education, and daily workflow needs. For software developers and enterprise users, OpenAI’s new GPT-4.1 (available through API) has started to push this even further, offering up to 1 million tokens in a session. However, as of now, these expanded capabilities are not directly available inside the standard ChatGPT user interface, meaning most users still interact with the 128k-token limit.
Visual brains for PDFs. One of ChatGPT’s biggest advantages is its focus on visual and multimodal content. With Visual Retrieval enabled on Enterprise workspaces, ChatGPT can analyze not just the text of a document but also any embedded images, charts, diagrams, and scanned forms contained within a PDF. This is extremely useful for professionals who regularly work with reports, market research, or presentations where the key information is often found in graphics or visual data. For users on Plus or Team plans, ChatGPT can still interpret standalone images uploaded alongside text files, though the seamless integration of embedded visuals is currently reserved for Enterprise users. The result is an AI assistant that can answer questions about specific figures in a chart, compare diagrams, or summarize graphical trends, making it a practical choice for visually rich documentation.
Clickable preview card Another feature that sets ChatGPT apart is its user-friendly approach to document navigation. When you upload a file, ChatGPT automatically generates a clickable thumbnail preview card showing the file’s name and page count. This allows users to quickly review and orient themselves within the document, even before asking a question. Clicking on the preview opens a lightweight viewer for basic page navigation, making it much easier to refer to specific sections or find a particular table or graph. While this is not a full document editor, it adds a layer of convenience and accessibility that’s especially helpful for people dealing with multiple files or those who need to reference visual layouts as part of their workflow.
Integrated extras. ChatGPT-4o distinguishes itself further with an integrated suite of productivity tools. On paid plans, users have access to Browse (for live web searches), Advanced Data Analysis (which enables Python scripting and complex calculations), voice input, and the new Canvas feature for brainstorming or visualization. This means you can not only extract insights from a document but also pull in up-to-date data from the internet, run statistical analyses on spreadsheet content, or generate custom visualizations—without ever leaving the chat window. This tight integration with external data and analytical tools makes ChatGPT an extremely flexible assistant for modern, information-heavy tasks.
Side-by-Side Comparison
* Embedded visuals inside PDFs require ChatGPT Enterprise; Plus / Team users can upload images separately.
Choosing the Right Tool
Use Claude Opus 4 when you must ingest huge, densely written files—contracts, research papers, technical manuals—and issue complex, multi-step instructions across the entire text. The 200 K-token window plus native vision make it a powerhouse for deep reading.
Use ChatGPT-4o when your files mix text and visuals, or when you need an interactive preview plus auxiliary tools like web search or Python data analysis. Enterprise users reap the most benefit from Visual Retrieval, but even Plus users gain from the preview card and code interpreter.
Many power users keep both on hand: Claude for depth and length, ChatGPT for visuals and integrated tooling. Pick the one that matches the document in front of you—and switch when the next file demands it.
____________
FOLLOW US FOR MORE.
DATA STUDIOS




