top of page
Search

Comparable company analysis: valuing a business through peer market multiples

ree

Comparable company analysis (Comps) is a relative valuation method that estimates the value of a business by comparing it to publicly traded companies with similar operational, financial, and market characteristics.

It is widely used in investment banking, private equity, and corporate finance because it reflects current market sentiment and pricing trends for similar businesses.



The logic behind the Comps approach.

The underlying principle is that companies with similar risk profiles, growth prospects, and operational models should trade at similar valuation multiples.

By applying these market-derived multiples to the target company’s metrics, analysts can estimate a reasonable valuation range.


Key steps in a comparable company analysis.

  1. Select peer companies Peers are chosen based on industry classification, business model, size, geography, and growth profile. For example, valuing a mid-cap renewable energy firm would involve peers in the same sector with similar revenue and capacity metrics.

  2. Collect financial data Obtain the latest financial statements and market data for the peer group, including revenue, EBITDA, net income, market capitalization, and enterprise value.

  3. Normalize financials Adjust for non-recurring items, accounting differences, and capital structure variations to make figures comparable.

  4. Calculate valuation multiples Common metrics include:

Multiple

Formula

Usage

EV / Revenue

Enterprise Value ÷ Revenue

Early-stage or low-profit companies

EV / EBITDA

Enterprise Value ÷ EBITDA

Core operating performance comparison

P / E

Market Price per Share ÷ Earnings per Share

Equity-level valuation

EV / EBIT

Enterprise Value ÷ EBIT

Capital-structure-neutral profitability

P / BV

Market Price per Share ÷ Book Value per Share

Asset-heavy industries

  1. Apply multiples to target company Example: If peer group average EV/EBITDA is 8.0× and the target’s EBITDA is $50m, implied EV = $400m.

  2. Adjust for company-specific factors Premiums or discounts may apply for differences in growth rate, risk, or market position.



Advantages of comparable company analysis.

  • Market-driven: Reflects what investors are currently willing to pay for similar assets.

  • Quick to update: Easy to refresh with the latest market data.

  • Broad acceptance: Used across industries and transaction types.


Limitations and risks.

  • Market volatility: Valuation can swing with short-term sentiment, not fundamentals.

  • Peer selection bias: Inappropriate comparables can distort the result.

  • Accounting differences: Variations in standards and reporting can affect comparability.

Challenge

Impact on Valuation

Overly broad peer group

Dilutes accuracy of multiples

Misaligned business models

Leads to overvaluation or undervaluation

Temporary market dislocation

Produces multiples not reflective of long-term value



Best practice in using Comps.

  • Combine with DCF and precedent transactions for triangulation.

  • Use median multiples to minimize outlier influence.

  • Perform sensitivity analysis on selected multiples to account for uncertainty.


Under US GAAP and IFRS, comparable company analysis is not mandated but is frequently used in fairness opinions, transaction pricing, and internal corporate valuations.Its strength lies in providing a market-based benchmark that can validate or challenge intrinsic valuations, ensuring that corporate decisions align with prevailing investor expectations.



____________

FOLLOW US FOR MORE.


DATA STUDIOS


bottom of page