Elon Musk’s relationship with OpenAI (and his own chatbot)

Elon Musk helped create OpenAI in 2015, aiming to make artificial intelligence research open and accessible for everyone, not just big tech companies.

He invested money and influence to help OpenAI become a major force, insisting that the technology be developed safely and shared widely.

Disagreements over how fast to move and how much to share led Musk to leave the OpenAI board in 2018. After leaving, Musk criticized OpenAI’s decision to partner with Microsoft and shift toward profit, arguing this betrayed the original mission.

In 2023, Musk started his own AI company, xAI, with the goal of building a more transparent, uncensored chatbot called Grok...

Elon Musk wanted to shape artificial intelligence for the benefit of all, and so he helped found OpenAI.

In 2015, at a time when the world was waking up to the transformative potential of artificial intelligence but also becoming increasingly anxious about who would control it, Elon Musk made the decision to put his reputation, influence, and money behind a new kind of research lab. Musk had already spent years warning that unchecked AI could pose a serious threat to society, and he saw firsthand how much power a handful of tech companies were beginning to concentrate. When he joined forces with other tech leaders and thinkers, he argued forcefully that whatever super-intelligent systems emerged in the future, they should never be the property of a few individuals or hidden behind corporate walls. Instead, Musk insisted that the knowledge, code, and even the risks should be openly shared so that the benefits would be available to everyone and the dangers could be addressed collectively. Musk’s presence brought enormous attention to OpenAI from the start, and his personal brand made the idea of a non-profit, open research lab into a real global force. The original model was based on transparency and collaboration, with the founding team promising to share their breakthroughs and avoid secretive power plays that could lead to dangerous outcomes. Without Musk’s early advocacy, OpenAI may have remained a small, academic effort, but his involvement made it a lightning rod for both hope and controversy in the emerging AI world.

Musk’s influence was powerful in setting the culture and vision, but disagreements emerged over speed and openness.

From the beginning, Elon Musk made it clear that he wanted OpenAI to move quickly and with bold ambitions, believing that waiting for others to act responsibly was simply too risky. His personality and management style—impatient, direct, and sometimes confrontational—shaped the early direction of the company, which became known for publishing research that other labs would have kept secret and for aiming directly at the most challenging AI goals. But as the industry matured, the reality of competition with companies like Google, Facebook, and Microsoft forced the OpenAI team to rethink how much they could share and how quickly they could release new models without causing harm. Inside the organization, discussions grew tense about whether it was possible to be truly “open” while still leading the field, and Musk found himself pushing for even faster, more radical progress, sometimes clashing with those who prioritized safety, regulatory engagement, or gradual deployment. In 2018, these differences came to a head, and Musk decided to step down from the board, officially citing conflicts with his other companies, especially Tesla’s push into AI for self-driving. The reality was more complex, as Musk later made it clear that he no longer agreed with the company’s slower, more cautious approach and wanted to pursue his own vision elsewhere. His exit did not remove his influence, but it allowed the remaining leadership to take OpenAI in a new direction that combined public research with more controlled, commercially focused projects.

After leaving, Musk’s public criticism of OpenAI grew as the company shifted toward partnerships and profit.

Once he was no longer tied to OpenAI’s board, Musk wasted little time before going public with his dissatisfaction over the direction the lab was taking. As OpenAI began to attract serious investment, most notably from Microsoft, and transitioned into a hybrid “capped-profit” structure, Musk called out what he saw as a betrayal of the group’s original promises. He accused OpenAI of abandoning its open, transparent roots in favor of partnerships with the very tech giants it once sought to balance, and he was particularly critical of the decision to grant Microsoft exclusive commercial access to its most powerful language models. Musk’s criticisms were blunt and highly visible, reaching not only industry insiders but also the broader public, as he warned that the commercialization of AI could lead to loss of control, unpredictable consequences, and even outright danger if the wrong actors gained access. His public statements—often delivered on social media—did not just attack business decisions but raised questions about trust, mission drift, and the ethical obligations of those building the most powerful new technologies of the century. In doing so, Musk forced both OpenAI and its competitors to answer for their choices in the public eye, keeping pressure on them to justify how their actions served the common good.

Musk’s competitive spirit led him to start xAI, with the promise of a different, more transparent AI.

Elon Musk’s approach to disappointment has always been to build something new, and after publicly breaking with OpenAI, he turned his energy toward creating an alternative that would reflect his priorities. In 2023, he founded xAI with a clear and direct message: the company would pursue artificial intelligence without the constraints of corporate alliances or government interference, aiming for an AI that could explain itself, reason with evidence, and deliver what Musk called “truthful” answers. xAI’s first chatbot, Grok, arrived with much fanfare, promising less filtered responses and a greater willingness to tackle challenging, even controversial, topics. Grok stood out by drawing real-time information from X (formerly Twitter), letting it give answers based on the latest discussions, memes, and news—something other chatbots carefully avoided. Musk openly marketed Grok as the alternative to the “sanitized” and “politically correct” responses given by OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini, promising that his AI would not shy away from uncomfortable truths or difficult questions. He gathered a team of respected AI researchers and pushed for fast development, signaling that xAI would not simply copy what others were doing, but would become a distinct force—one that, according to Musk, would eventually deliver the kind of general intelligence that his earlier efforts at OpenAI had only begun to imagine.

Through these moves, Musk has kept the world’s focus on both the promise and the danger of advanced AI.

Even after leaving OpenAI, Elon Musk’s involvement in artificial intelligence has remained a constant topic in the industry, the media, and government circles. His warnings about AI risks—whether about the dangers of unchecked growth, the chance of manipulation by corporations, or the possibility of autonomous systems acting unpredictably—have made their way into international policy debates and safety discussions at the highest levels. When Musk speaks about AI, he attracts headlines, and his mix of technical knowledge and dramatic predictions ensures that both policymakers and the general public remain aware that these technologies are not just tools, but potential forces for massive social and economic change. His constant push for openness and transparency, combined with his criticism of existing players, has forced companies to be more accountable, often releasing research and safety guidelines they might otherwise have kept private. In this way, Musk’s role has become less about a single company and more about keeping the conversation alive—never letting the risks, or the promises, of AI slip out of public view.

Musk’s early support was essential to OpenAI’s launch, but his exit accelerated new directions for both sides.

Without Elon Musk’s initial funding and influence, OpenAI would likely have been a much smaller project, struggling for attention and credibility. His backing made the lab into a symbol of how ambitious, ethical research could be done differently, and his willingness to speak out attracted a broader coalition of researchers, policymakers, and funders who were interested in safe, fair AI. When he left, it forced OpenAI to clarify its mission and choose a new direction, one that leaned more heavily on private investment and practical deployment, leading directly to the launch of ChatGPT, DALL-E, and other highly visible products. At the same time, Musk’s rivalry kept the organization from becoming complacent, as his public criticisms and new ventures continually raised the bar for transparency, honesty, and innovation. The split between Musk and OpenAI didn’t just affect two companies—it reshaped how the entire industry thought about balancing openness with safety, profit with principle, and speed with caution.

Musk’s willingness to act as an outsider has allowed him to challenge industry norms and force uncomfortable conversations.

One thing that sets Musk apart from other technology founders is his willingness to go against the grain, even when it means making enemies or breaking with old friends. After OpenAI became more corporate and aligned itself with Microsoft, most of its former supporters either stayed quiet or quietly adjusted to the new reality, but Musk did the opposite—he spoke out, started over, and made his disagreements public. This approach meant that issues like “AI safety,” “model transparency,” and “bias” became unavoidable topics for every company in the field, not just internal matters. By running xAI as a completely separate entity and constantly criticizing the closed, profit-focused behavior of other labs, Musk has kept the spotlight on questions that make others uncomfortable. Whether or not one agrees with his tactics or his opinions, Musk’s willingness to be the outsider ensures that alternative viewpoints are not just possible but visible, and that industry leaders are forced to confront the trade-offs they make in the pursuit of innovation.

Musk’s brand power and public platform have changed how AI research is discussed and reported.

It’s important to recognize how Musk’s unique ability to capture attention—through his companies, his social media presence, and his constant willingness to make bold predictions—has shaped the very way that artificial intelligence is discussed in public. News about AI breakthroughs, policy debates, or ethical crises almost always mention Musk’s views, and journalists regularly use his statements as benchmarks for evaluating whether developments are exciting, risky, or both. His presence draws media coverage to otherwise technical topics, ensuring that issues like data privacy, algorithmic bias, and global AI competition are not just for specialists but for the general population. The result is that discussions about AI’s future are now more inclusive, with people from outside the traditional tech world participating, criticizing, and questioning where things are heading. Musk’s celebrity status has turned AI research into a matter of public interest and debate, giving the technology a much bigger role in global culture than it might otherwise have had.

Musk’s rivalry with OpenAI and his push for alternatives have made the chatbot landscape more competitive and diverse.

Finally, the direct competition between Musk’s xAI and the now Microsoft-backed OpenAI has created an environment where innovation happens faster, new features are rolled out more quickly, and users have more options than ever before. Each company is forced to distinguish itself—whether through transparency, speed, ethical commitments, or product design—because they know that consumers, journalists, and regulators are watching closely. Musk’s decision to launch Grok with live data feeds and a more unfiltered style pushed other chatbots to reconsider their approaches, sometimes even relaxing restrictions or offering more transparency about how their systems work.

___________

FOLLOW US FOR MORE.

DATA STUDIOS

datastudios.org