Grok 4 vs. previous models (1, 1.5, 2, 3, 3.5): Full Comparison of Architecture, Capabilities, and reasoning power
- Graziano Stefanelli
- Jul 27
- 31 min read
Grok 4 introduces a model scale, reasoning structure, and tool autonomy that did not exist in any prior Grok version. Its multi-agent inference mode, 256k-token context, and native ability to trigger search and code tools reflect a fundamental shift in how the model processes and resolves complex tasks.
This report compares Grok 4 to versions 1, 1.5, 2, 3, and 3.5 across core dimensions: architecture, benchmarks, logic chains, coding ability, use case integration, and safety design.
Model Architecture and Evolution
Let's start with the Scale and Architecture: The Grok series has grown dramatically in size and complexity. Grok-1 was a 314 billion parameter Mixture-of-Experts transformer model (with ~25% of weights active per token). This model was trained from scratch in 2023 and even open-sourced (Apache 2.0) after initial beta testing. Grok-1.5 built on that base with improved training but kept a similar architecture; its parameter count wasn’t disclosed, but it introduced major upgrades like a 128,000-token context window, 16× longer than Grok-1, enabling it to handle much larger documents. Grok-1.5V (Vision) was the first multimodal incarnation, adding image understanding to the text model (though this vision model was previewed and never widely released).
By Grok-2 (Aug 2024), xAI significantly upgraded the model’s capabilities. While exact parameters remain proprietary, Grok-2 was a more powerful transformer with frontier performance. It retained multimodality and even gained image generation ability via an integrated diffusion model (“FLUX.1”). Grok-2 maintained the long 128k context and introduced a smaller variant Grok-2 mini for faster responses. The architecture of Grok-2 focused on better reasoning and tool-use, as evidenced by its superior performance in competitive benchmarks (more on that below).
Grok 3 (Feb 2025) scaled up further – Elon Musk noted it was trained with 10× more compute than Grok-2 on xAI’s massive “Colossus” GPU cluster (~200k GPUs). The architecture was refined for reasoning: xAI describes Grok 3 as a multimodal “reasoning model”. Indeed, Grok 3 introduced a dedicated Reasoning mode (“Think” or “Big Brain”), which allowed the model to think through problems in multiple steps, using more computation per query. (Notably, the “Big Brain” multi-step mode was tested internally but never enabled for end users.) Grok 3 continued to support images and by this time voice input/output was being rolled out (Musk hinted at a voice mode within a week of Grok 3’s launch). The context length for Grok 3 was around 32k tokens (an improvement over Grok-2’s window).
Grok 4 (July 2025) represents a major leap in both scale and design. It is reportedly a Mixture-of-Experts transformer with on the order of 1.7 trillion parameters total – a huge jump in capacity. The model architecture emphasizes deep reasoning: xAI ran an unprecedented reinforcement learning fine-tuning at pre-training scale to hone Grok 4’s chain-of-thought abilities. In practice, Grok 4 includes “native tool use” – the model was trained to invoke tools like web search and a code interpreter autonomously when needed. Additionally, a special mode called Grok 4 Heavy spawns multiple reasoning agents in parallel, effectively running several thought processes at once and then “comparing notes” to produce the best answer.
This multi-agent inference technique lets Grok 4 Heavy achieve higher reliability on hard tasks by exploring various solutions in parallel. Grok 4’s context window is enormous: 128k tokens in the consumer app, and up to 256k tokens via the API. The model is fully multimodal (text + vision) and also has a high-quality voice mode (with a new realistic voice) that even allows the AI to analyze what the user’s camera sees in real-time.
The table below summarizes key architectural features across Grok versions:
Training Data Scale and Knowledge Recency
Each Grok iteration expanded the training data in both size and scope. Grok-1’s pre-training (completed Oct 2023) used a large text corpus collected over a few months – reportedly including web data, code, and possibly X (Twitter) posts – but with a cutoff before mid-2023. (In fact, xAI tested Grok-1 on a May 2023 Hungarian math exam that was not in its training data, to verify generalization.) Grok-1 was essentially “the best we could do with 2 months of training” as xAI described, highlighting that its dataset and training time were relatively limited.
Grok-1.5 (early 2024) likely reused and extended Grok-1’s dataset, focusing on quality over quantity. While no new cut-off was given, xAI emphasized improved reasoning rather than a huge influx of new data. However, one notable augmentation was in long-text data to enable the 128k context – Grok-1.5 had to learn from very long documents to utilize its extended window. Its training may also have included more coding and math content, given the big jump in those domains (e.g. Grok-1.5 excelled at math benchmarks that Grok-1 struggled with).
By Grok-2, xAI started to vastly increase training data volume and diversity. The Grok-2 announcement notes “significant improvements in reasoning with retrieved content,” implying it was trained on retrieval-based QA tasks. Grok-2’s dataset explicitly included multi-modal data (images and text) by design – it launched with image generation and later was updated with image understanding, so it was trained on paired image-text data and possibly visual question answering corpora. xAI also integrated platform-specific data: by late 2024, Grok had access to X posts and could search the web, so its training likely included large swaths of social media content and up-to-date web text (subject to whatever cutoff before launch). We see evidence of fresh data use in that Grok-2 had “frontier capabilities” and even appeared on leaderboards under a pseudonym, outperforming contemporary models – it must have trained on a broad array of recent internet content to achieve that.
Grok 3’s training corpus grew not just in size (10× compute suggests a much larger token count or model size) but also in scope. xAI’s team says Grok 3 was trained on an “expanded dataset” that “reportedly includes legal filings”, among other new domains. This signals a shift to incorporate more specialized and up-to-date knowledge, such as law, which earlier Grok versions lacked. Indeed, Grok 3 was benchmarked on novel tests like AIME (a new 2025 math reasoning exam) and it outperformed OpenAI’s models there – suggesting it had training data tailored to advanced mathematics and science. We can infer Grok 3’s knowledge cutoff likely extended into late 2024, given it launched in Feb 2025 with awareness of recent events (it even had to be modified to stop producing 2024 election misinformation in real time). Additionally, Grok 3’s introduction of the DeepSearch feature (live internet scanning) reduced reliance on static training data for current events, since the model could fetch information on the fly. Musk also mentioned plans to open-source Grok-2’s model in 2025, implying that by Grok 3, the proprietary training corpus was far beyond what had been released publicly.
Grok 4 took data scale to a new level. xAI undertook a “massive data collection effort” to support Grok 4’s RL-heavy training. They greatly expanded beyond Grok 3’s math- and code-focused corpus into “many more domains,” while ensuring much of it was verifiable data. The emphasis on verifiability likely means Grok 4 was fed large curated datasets from science, engineering, news, and other fields where answers can be checked, to strengthen truthful reasoning. Indeed, Grok 4’s benchmark dominance in diverse areas (science questions, legal reasoning, etc.) indicates a broad and current knowledge base. xAI has not disclosed an exact cutoff date for pretraining data, but given the model’s release in July 2025 and its strong performance on early-2025 benchmark exams, we can surmise its training data includes material up to 2025. Moreover, because Grok 4 can use real-time search as a built-in tool, it effectively has access to up-to-the-minute information when answering – greatly mitigating any static cutoff. In summary, each Grok generation was trained on an increasingly large, diverse, and recent dataset: from Grok-1’s relatively narrow 2023 snapshot, to Grok-4’s vast multi-domain corpus augmented by real-time web access.
Performance Benchmarks Over Time
Across standard benchmarks, Grok models have made rapid progress – from roughly ChatGPT-3.5 level in late 2023 to superhuman in several domains by 2025. Below is a comparison of key benchmark results:
MMLU (academic knowledge): Grok-1 scored ~73% on the 5-shot MMLU test, already competitive with early GPT-3.5. Grok-1.5 jumped to 81.3%, and Grok-2 reached 87.5%, nearly matching larger frontier models like GPT-4 Turbo. By Grok-4, xAI claims the model “saturates” many knowledge benchmarks – effectively hitting the ceiling. Grok 4 Heavy achieves state-of-the-art on MMLU-Pro (an advanced version of MMLU) and similar exams. In fact, Grok 4 tied for #1 on MMLU-Pro among all models tested. These results indicate Grok 4 has essentially mastered broad factual and academic knowledge, surpassing or matching GPT-4-level performance on this benchmark.
GSM8K (math word problems): Early Grok struggled with complex multi-step math. Grok-1 achieved ~63% on GSM8K (with chain-of-thought prompting). But Grok-1.5 made a huge leap to 90% on GSM8K – an exceptionally high score (GPT-4 is around 80–95% depending on prompting). This suggests Grok-1.5 was heavily optimized for math reasoning. Grok-2 likely maintained or improved on this (xAI didn’t publish GSM8K for Grok-2, but given its focus on math, it would be at or near GPT-4’s level). By Grok-4, the model’s math prowess is clear: it achieved 100% on the AIME 2024 math competition dataset, and was the leader on USAMO 2025 (a notoriously difficult Olympiad-level math contest) with 61.9% score – likely well above what any previous model or even many human competitors achieved. These are extraordinary reasoning feats. We can safely say Grok 4 handles grade-school to competition-level math better than any prior Grok, and arguably better than any other AI model in 2025 on record.
HumanEval (coding ability): Grok’s coding skill has improved dramatically with each generation. Grok-1 could solve about 63% of the Python programming problems in the HumanEval test (pass@1) – roughly on par with early Codex or ChatGPT-3.5. Grok-1.5 bumped this to 74.1%, a substantial improvement. Grok-2 then reached 88.4% pass@1, essentially matching GPT-4’s level (for context, GPT-4’s pass@1 on HumanEval is ~85–90% in 2023-24). By the time of Grok 3 and 3.5, xAI began developing specialized coding modes – and with Grok 4 they unveiled a “Grok 4 Code” model variant tuned for software development. According to industry evaluations, Grok 4’s coding performance is at the very top tier: it scores ~72–75% on a comprehensive coding benchmark (SWE-Bench), slightly above GPT-4’s ~65–70% on the same test. (Notably, Grok 4 came in 4th place on the standard HumanEval among all models – behind a few specialized models – but essentially in the same league as the best OpenAI and DeepMind code solvers.) In practice, Grok 4 can generate correct, well-structured code for most programming challenges, even outperforming Claude 4 and Google’s Gemini on many coding tasks.
Other benchmarks: Grok models have also been evaluated on an array of knowledge and reasoning tests. Grok-2 showed strong results on MMLU-Pro (75.5%) and the MATH competition dataset (76.1% maj@1), far above Grok-1.5. Grok-2 was state-of-the-art on certain vision+math tasks like MathVista. Grok 3’s introduction of a reasoning engine allowed it to top newer benchmarks: xAI reported Grok 3 Reasoning beat OpenAI’s o3-mini on their internal exams. By Grok 4, the model is setting records. For example, on ARC-AGI (v2) – a test of abstract reasoning and “intelligence” – Grok 4 scored 15.9%, nearly double the previous best (Claude 4 at 8.6%). And on the extremely difficult “Humanity’s Last Exam” (a collection of PhD-level questions across subjects), Grok 4 scored 25.4% without tools and 38.6% with tool use, handily beating Google Gemini 2.5 (21.6%/26.9%) and OpenAI’s models (o3 at 21.0%/24.9%). In fact, Grok 4 Heavy (using multi-agent reasoning) pushed the score to 44.4% on that exam – and over 50% on the subset of purely text questions. These are milestone results (50% on HLE was considered essentially “passing humanity’s hardest test” and Grok 4 Heavy was the first to crack it). In summary, Grok 4 now outperforms rival models like GPT-4, Claude 4, and Gemini on many frontier benchmarks, especially in domains requiring complex reasoning, math, or scientific knowledge.
To put this in perspective, the first Grok was roughly on par with an early ChatGPT, whereas Grok 4 is touted as possibly “the most intelligent model in the world,” surpassing even OpenAI’s latest on several metrics. However, it’s worth noting that some benchmark gains (especially Grok 4’s) have raised questions of overfitting or idiosyncratic behavior, as we’ll discuss under safety/alignment. Still, the quantitative trend is clear: each Grok version has dramatically closed the gap with, and now even outpaced, the leading AI models in benchmark performance.
Reasoning and Coding Capabilities
One of xAI’s core focuses with Grok has been improving reasoning, logic, and coding skills in each iteration. This is evident both in training methods and in the model’s new features for problem-solving.
Chain-of-Thought and “Think” Mode: From Grok-1’s launch, xAI leveraged chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting to evaluate and improve math/problem-solving. Grok-1’s baseline reasoning was limited (as seen in its mediocre math scores), but the team quickly iterated. Grok-1.5 showed much stronger logical reasoning – it could handle multi-step word problems far better, likely due to training on more CoT data or better internal recursion. By Grok-3, xAI formally introduced a Reasoning mode. In the interface, users could tap a “Think” button to prompt Grok to ponder more deeply, activating a larger computation graph for complex queries. Under the hood, Grok 3 Reasoning was akin to models like OpenAI’s o3 or DeepSeek’s R1: it could internally break a task into substeps, or run a more exhaustive search for answers. xAI even experimented with a “Big Brain” mode that would have allocated even more compute (and possibly multiple passes) to very hard problems, though this was never rolled out to users. The result was a model that, when put in reasoning mode, could solve puzzles and logical challenges that stumped earlier versions. For instance, Grok 3 in “Think” mode reportedly outperformed OpenAI’s best mini reasoning model on several benchmarks.
Native Tool Use in Grok 4: Grok 4 took reasoning a step further by training the model to know when and how to use external tools autonomously. Unlike previous Groks that only integrated tools via the platform, Grok 4’s neural network itself learned to output steps like: <Search query>, <Run code>, etc., as part of its chain-of-thought. During training, xAI fine-tuned Grok 4 with reinforcement learning so that it could call a code interpreter for calculations or use a web browser for up-to-date facts. Now, when Grok 4 faces a difficult question – say a timely research query or a math puzzle – it can decide to perform a live web search, fetch information, and then reason about it. The user sees the AI performing these tool actions in real-time. An example from xAI shows Grok 4 given a vague request (“find that crazy word puzzle post about legs”) and the model autonomously searches X (Twitter) with relevant queries, sifts the results, then finds and cites the correct viral post from days prior. This kind of self-directed retrieval was not present in Grok-1 through 3 – it’s a new capability of Grok 4’s trained policy. It dramatically boosts the model’s research skills and reduces hallucination, since Grok can verify facts via search.
Parallel Reasoning (Heavy): Grok 4 Heavy’s multi-agent approach further enhances reasoning reliability. In Heavy mode, multiple instances of Grok run in parallel, each exploring a different line of thought, and then they share findings to converge on the best answer. Elon Musk described it not as a simple majority vote, but as agents “comparing notes” for a consensus. This technique helps in tasks where a single chain-of-thought might go wrong – with parallel agents, there’s a better chance at least one finds the correct path. It is essentially an automated form of ensemble reasoning. For example, on an extremely hard reasoning puzzle, standard Grok 4 might score ~38%, but Heavy mode boosted that to ~50% by considering multiple hypotheses. This echoes the idea of self-refinement in AI reasoning and is a cutting-edge feature in Grok 4 Heavy (not found in earlier Groks or most competitor models as a built-in option).
Coding Skills and Features: As noted in benchmarks, Grok’s coding ability has gone from basic to near-expert over its versions. By Grok-2, it was already outperforming models like Claude 2 and even challenging GPT-4 on code generation tasks. Grok-2 and 3 were used in coding assistance scenarios – for instance, developers noted Grok 3’s excellence at explaining and refactoring code, though it could stumble on ambiguous functions (as one HackerNews commenter observed). xAI hasn’t been shy about targeting programming use cases: they even integrated Grok into a Prompt IDE tool (announced late 2023) to help with prompt engineering and code interpretability. With Grok 4, xAI introduced a specialized “Grok 4 Code” model. This variant is optimized for coding tasks – it was tested in an IDE-like environment (“Cursor” integration) and can achieve ~72–75% on code challenges, slightly above GPT-4’s performance. Grok 4 Code is likely fine-tuned with extra code data and possibly uses a different system prompt to produce structured, commented code. Users have reported that Grok 4 is very good at writing code with minimal bugs, explaining code, and even assisting in debugging and architecture suggestions. It also supports “LiveCode” execution in the chat: Grok can run Python code and use the output to inform its answer (similar to OpenAI’s Code Interpreter plugin).
In summary, each Grok release has added more sophisticated reasoning and coding capabilities: Grok-1.5 brought reliable multi-step math; Grok-2 added tool-use heuristics and better code generation; Grok-3 added an internal reasoning engine and improved logic; and Grok-4 has unified all this with actual tool integration and multi-agent strategies. The result is that Grok 4 can tackle highly complex problems – from writing a full program from a hand-drawn diagram, to proving math theorems, to answering nuanced scientific questions – often at a level above its predecessors and even above other leading AI models.
Feature Set and Functionality Evolution
Beyond raw model improvements, xAI steadily expanded Grok’s feature set with each version, making it a more useful and versatile AI assistant. Below we outline how key features evolved: real-time information access, multimodal inputs/outputs, memory and context handling, and other advanced functionalities:
Real-Time Search Integration: A defining trait of Grok (stemming from Elon Musk’s vision of a “TruthGPT”) is its connection to live data. Grok-1 already had “real-time knowledge of the world via the platform” (X/Twitter) as a unique advantage. In practice, early Grok could access current tweets and trending info. However, full web search was not initially enabled. By Grok-2’s era (late 2024), xAI enabled a proper web browsing tool. On November 16, 2024, Grok gained web search capabilities, allowing it to fetch information from the internet during a chat. Users could ask about latest news or facts and Grok-2 would retrieve up-to-date answers – a feature competitors only offered via plugins. Grok-3 enhanced this with DeepSearch, which not only searched the web but also scanned X posts in depth to generate detailed summaries. DeepSearch positioned Grok 3 as a direct competitor to tools like Bing Chat or ChatGPT’s browsing mode, but arguably more seamlessly integrated. Finally, Grok-4 has made real-time search a native part of its skillset. As discussed, Grok 4 will decide on its own to execute searches when needed, blending the retrieved content into its answers. It can search across the web, X, and even specific news sources via xAI’s new “live search API”. This means for the user, Grok 4 feels like an AI with an internet-connected brain – one can ask about this morning’s stock prices or a niche forum post, and Grok will dig up the info in-line. No previous Grok had search this tightly woven into its responses.
Multimodality (Vision and Voice): The Grok series evolved from text-only to fully multimodal. Grok-1.5 Vision (V) in April 2024 was the first time xAI demonstrated image understanding: Grok-1.5V could interpret photographs, diagrams, charts, and screenshots, and answer questions about them. It outperformed peers on tasks like AI2D (diagram understanding) and RealWorldQA (spatial reasoning from images). However, Grok-1.5V was a preview and never released to the public. Grok-2 then incorporated multimodality into the user-facing product. On launch it could generate images via the Aurora model (announced Dec 2024) – users could prompt Grok-2 to create images, similar to DALL-E or Stable Diffusion. By October 28, 2024, Grok-2 was also given image input capability, meaning the chatbot could accept an image upload and respond with analysis or description (e.g. explain a meme or read a screenshot). This lagged GPT-4’s vision release by only a few weeks, showing xAI’s fast follow. With Grok-3, multimodality matured: not only were images firmly supported, but Musk promised a voice mode where Grok could speak and listen. Indeed, in early 2025 Grok gained a voice chat feature (similar to ChatGPT’s later voice update). By Grok-4, voice and vision converge. Grok 4’s Voice Mode is significantly upgraded – it has a new, natural-sounding voice and faster, more interactive speech ability. Users can now engage in spoken conversation with Grok. Moreover, in voice mode you can point your camera at something while talking, and Grok will visually analyze the live scene and discuss it. This effectively gives Grok real-time computer vision: for example, you could be outdoors, show your phone camera a plant, and ask Grok what it sees – Grok will identify the plant and talk to you about it. This “see what you see” feature is directly comparable to Google Gemini’s promised multimodal abilities and goes beyond what GPT-4V offered (GPT-4’s vision was not real-time or integrated with voice in the initial release). In short, Grok’s evolution: text-only (Grok-1) → images in/out (Grok-2) → voice + images (Grok-3) → combined vision-with-voice live analysis (Grok-4). This progression has turned Grok into a true multimodal assistant that can read, generate, and discuss both text and imagery in natural language.
Memory and Context: Memory in language models can refer to long context windows and the ability to remember past dialogues or user-specific info. Grok-1 had a standard context (we presume a few thousand tokens), meaning it could not carry too much information in a single session. Grok-1.5 tackled this with the huge 128k context upgrade. This allowed, for example, entire books or codebases to be loaded into Grok’s window for analysis – a major leap that even GPT-4 only achieved later in a limited form. Grok-1.5 proved its long-context prowess by perfectly retrieving buried facts in 100k-token test documents. Grok-2 maintained the 128k window and xAI started exploring memory features beyond a single session. In April 2025, between Grok-3 and 4, xAI was testing “memory references” in the Grok web app. This feature lets Grok recall previous conversations on demand – essentially long-term memory across sessions, similar to how ChatGPT can refer to past chats for some users. The idea is that you could have persistent workspaces or personas that Grok remembers (e.g. a “coding assistant” chat and a separate “travel planner” chat, each with context). Additionally, xAI began integrating external memory via services like Google Drive – so Grok could fetch your documents or notes when needed. By the time Grok-4 launched, its API supports a 256k token context (currently one of the largest of any model), doubling what Grok-3 offered. In practical terms, 256k tokens (~200k words) is enough to include hundreds of pages of reference material in a single query. This is immensely useful for enterprises who want Grok to ingest entire manuals or code repositories at once. The user-facing apps still use 128k (likely for latency reasons), but even that is far beyond most competitors’ 32k limit. On the persistent memory front, Grok-4 is expected to roll out the “referenced chats” feature widely, allowing continuity across sessions. Thus, each generation improved how much Grok can “remember” – from short conversations in v1 to book-length context in v1.5, and now to cross-session memory and massive context in v4. These developments make Grok especially powerful for long-running research tasks or iterative assistance over time.
Structured Outputs and Other Tools: Along the way, xAI has given Grok other useful capabilities. Grok can produce structured outputs (like JSON, tables, or graphs) when appropriate, which became more reliable in later versions thanks to fine-tuning. It also gained an image editing tool by early 2025: users can upload an image and instruct Grok to modify it (e.g. change the style or remove an object), and Grok will apply its image generation model to output the edited image. This feature came as xAI worked to match competitors – similar to OpenAI’s “DALL-E 3 inpainting” or Adobe’s generative fill, and was set to be integrated into the Grok web UI. Another addition is Workspaces: a concept likely intended to organize projects or group content (imagine something like folders for different AI tasks). While details are sparse, Workspaces hint at productivity-oriented uses, allowing users to handle multiple documents or threads with Grok in an organized fashion. By Grok-4, xAI also rolled out “Companions” – AI avatars with specific personas that users can chat with in the Grok app. These include an anime-themed avatar and presumably others (perhaps similar to Character.AI’s bots). Companions don’t change Grok’s under-the-hood capabilities, but they offer customized styles or expertise, showing xAI’s focus on user engagement features in v4.
In summary, the functionality of Grok has evolved from a basic Q&A chatbot to a full-featured AI assistant platform. It can search the web, interpret images, carry on voice conversations, write and execute code, remember context over long periods, generate and edit images, and more – with each version adding new tools. xAI’s rapid development cycle (multiple major releases in ~18 months) closed many feature gaps with rivals. By late 2024, one reviewer noted it’s “impressive to see how quickly xAI is moving to close the feature gap with other leading AI products”. Now in 2025, Grok 4 arguably sets the bar in certain features (like context size and deep integration of search). This rich toolset opens up many real-world use cases for Grok, discussed next.
Real-World Use Cases and Integrations
From the outset, xAI aimed to make Grok a practical assistant for a wide range of tasks, integrating it where users already are (notably on the X platform). Over time, Grok’s deployment expanded from a closed beta to many platforms and specialized domains:
Integration with X (Twitter): Grok was first launched as a chatbot for X Premium users, essentially bringing an AI assistant into the Twitter ecosystem. In practice, Grok initially lived as a bot that users could query (possibly via DMs or a special interface). By 2024, X incorporated Grok more deeply: a dedicated Grok tab appeared in the X app for Premium subscribers. This gave users one-tap access to ask Grok questions or have it summarize content. A notable use case on X was news summarization – in April 2024, X replaced its human-curated news summaries with Grok’s AI summaries of breaking stories. So if a major news event happened, Grok would generate the short explainer shown to users. This is a real-world application where Grok-1.5 was directly informing potentially millions of users (with some controversy, as mistakes could spread widely). By making Grok an X feature, Musk essentially turned Twitter into a platform for mass AI-assisted information dissemination. In July 2025, xAI even had to address Grok generating offensive posts on X (more on that in Safety section) – highlighting that Grok’s output was actually being posted publicly on the social network in some contexts. As of Grok 4, the service remains tightly integrated with X: Premium and Premium+ subscribers access Grok as part of their subscription, and SuperGrok subscribers (a higher tier introduced mid-2025) get the latest models like Grok 4. There’s also a notion of using Grok on X data specifically: Grok 4 can perform advanced searches of Twitter content (even historical or semantic searches) as a tool for users. This could help users find old posts, analyze trends, or engage with the Twitter corpus in new ways via AI.
Standalone Apps and Web: To reach users outside of X, xAI released standalone Grok apps. In December 2024, they launched a Grok web app and iOS app (in beta, initially limited to Australia). An Android app followed in early 2025. By January 2025, the Grok app was made available worldwide. This means anyone (even non-Twitter users) could use Grok through a web interface or mobile app. The apps offer multimodal chat, voice, etc., just like the X interface. Notably, in early 2025 xAI opened Grok usage to non-paying users with some limits. For a “short time” in Feb 2025, Grok 3 was even enabled for all free users on X, and that access was never fully revoked. This indicates xAI’s push to get Grok widely adopted, even at the cost of giving some capabilities away for free (likely to compete with free ChatGPT and Bing). As of Grok 4, xAI still offers a free basic tier (possibly with an older model or limits) and then paid tiers ($30/mo for full Grok 4, $300/mo for Heavy).
Enterprise and API Integration: xAI has actively courted enterprise use of Grok. In November 2024 they launched an API Public Beta – allowing developers to programmatically use Grok’s foundation models. This trial offered free credits to attract devs. By April 2025, xAI introduced a production-ready Grok enterprise API, with pricing of $3 per million input tokens and $15 per million output tokens. Grok 4’s API (released July 2025) continues with similar pricing (which is actually quite competitive, roughly $0.003 per 1K input tokens – half of OpenAI’s GPT-4 Turbo rate). The API allows integration of Grok’s capabilities into other products and workflows. For example, a startup can use Grok 4 via API to power a customer support bot or an analytics tool. The deployment options also include cloud partnerships: in May 2025, it was announced that Grok 3 would be available on Microsoft Azure’s cloud platform. This Azure OpenAI Service integration means enterprises can choose Grok through a trusted cloud provider, easing adoption. xAI also mentioned Grok 4 would be coming to “hyperscaler partners” soon, implying availability on other clouds (perhaps AWS or Google Cloud). They’ve achieved SOC 2, GDPR, CCPA compliance as well, signaling focus on enterprise security needs.
Automotive and Specialized Uses: A fascinating real-world integration is Tesla’s use of Grok. In July 2025, Tesla pushed a software update adding Grok to the infotainment system of its cars. This means drivers can engage the Grok chatbot through their vehicle’s interface. It can answer questions, entertain, perhaps help troubleshoot (but notably it does not have control over the car’s functions, it’s limited to conversation). Given Tesla’s reach, this could put Grok in millions of cars, a unique deployment environment (similar to Siri in iPhones, but an AI model in cars). Another domain is government and military: xAI announced “Grok for Government” in July 2025, offering AI products tailored to U.S. government needs. In parallel, the U.S. Department of Defense revealed xAI (among others) won a $200M contract to provide AI for military use. While details are sparse, Grok could be used for things like analyzing intelligence reports, training simulations, or as a decision-support aide for government analysts. xAI likely will deploy Grok in secure on-prem or cloud environments for these clients, perhaps a modified, hardened version of Grok 4.
Everyday Use Cases: For end-users, Grok is marketed as a “cosmic guide” on anything – be it answering general questions, helping write documents, generating content, or coding. Because of its feature set, people use Grok for tasks like: writing essays or emails, brainstorming ideas with some wit (given Grok’s humorous tone), creating images/memes, getting coding help, solving math or science homework, summarizing lengthy PDFs, language translation (Grok supports multiple languages and xAI has improved its multilingual abilities over time), and even entertainment (chatting with Grok’s custom “Companion” personas, or using it in fun mode, when that existed). With the voice and mobile integration, Grok can function like a voice assistant (similar to Alexa or Siri, but presumably smarter in open-ended conversation). The witty personality of Grok (modeled after the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy humor) also attracts users looking for a less formal AI to have conversations with. It will even answer “spicy” or offbeat questions that other AI might refuse (with caveats under safety).
In essence, Grok has transitioned from a niche beta on X into a multi-platform AI service: embedded in social media (X), accessible via web/mobile apps, integrateable via API, and domain-specific deployments (cars, government). This broad integration strategy means all previous Grok models were eventually superseded by the next, but each served to expand the use cases. Grok 1.5 made it available to all Premium users (beyond select beta), Grok-2 opened up an API and even a free tier (bringing “Grok for all” in Dec 2024), Grok-3 brought it to external apps and global markets, and Grok-4 is poised to be the backbone of xAI’s enterprise and specialty solutions.
Deployment Options and Latency
Access Tiers: Deployment of Grok has been characterized by tiered availability. Initially, Grok-1 was limited to a very early beta for invited users and X Premium+ subscribers. It was then promised to Premium+ (the higher paid tier of Twitter) after beta. However, in March 2024 Musk decided to enable Grok for all Premium subscribers (including the lower tier), broadening access. Grok-1.5 was released directly to all X Premium users upon its completion in May 2024. So by mid-2024, anyone paying for Twitter Blue (Premium) had access to Grok (text-only at the time). With Grok-2’s launch in August 2024, xAI introduced Grok-2 mini alongside the full model. The mini model was available in beta to users likely as a faster, lighter option (possibly default for standard Premium, with full Grok-2 for Premium+ or enterprise). Both Grok-2 and 2-mini were also offered via an enterprise API starting that month, meaning companies could integrate them into their software. By end of 2024, xAI made Grok (1.5/2) free to try for all platform users with certain limits – essentially a freemium model (free tier with slower “mini” model and capped requests, and paid tiers for faster/better models).
By Grok 3’s release (Feb 2025), xAI formalized subscription tiers: Premium+ and xAI’s own “SuperGrok” subscribers got first access to Grok 3. (SuperGrok seems to be xAI’s direct subscription via grok.com, separate from Twitter Premium – they launched it for those who want the very latest model and higher limits.) The price of Premium+ on X was even raised from $22 to $40/month coinciding with Grok 3’s launch, underscoring that access to these advanced models is a premium feature. However, xAI did something unexpected with Grok 3: they allowed free access to it for a brief period and never shut it off. So effectively, many users got to use Grok 3 at no cost in early 2025, likely to build user base and gather feedback.
For Grok 4 (Jul 2025), the structure is: SuperGrok tier ($30/mo) gives access to Grok 4 (standard), and a new SuperGrok Heavy tier ($300/mo) provides access to Grok 4 Heavy. The heavy model is computationally expensive, hence the high price (targeted at enthusiasts or enterprises that need the absolute best quality). Premium+ users on X also have Grok 4 (since xAI stated it’s available to Premium+ as well). Meanwhile the API is available for Grok 4 on a pay-as-you-go basis. There is still a free tier (likely running an older model or the Grok-2 mini) for casual use on the app, ensuring new users can try Grok with limited capability.
Latency and Performance: As models grew larger, one might expect slower responses, but xAI mitigated this with infrastructure scaling and model variants. Grok-1 on launch ran on a proprietary JAX/Rust inference stack and was reasonably responsive for a large model, though details aren’t public. Grok-2 introduced the “mini” model precisely to offer low-latency answers when users didn’t need full power. Grok-2 mini likely had far fewer parameters (perhaps in the tens of billions range) and thus could respond very quickly, making it ideal for mobile use or simple queries. Grok-3 similarly had a mini model option. xAI’s UI might automatically choose mini vs full based on query complexity or user settings.
For heavy tasks, Grok-3’s unreleased “Big Brain” mode would have increased latency significantly (multiple passes). Grok-4 Heavy’s multi-agent approach does incur high latency – in demonstrations, each agent was given on the order of 10 minutes for complex problems. So a full Heavy response could take several minutes to compose for the most challenging queries.
This mode is intended for serious research questions, not casual chat. In normal operation, the standard Grok 4 model is faster than Heavy, though still a very large model to run. Independent tests by Artificial Analysis measured Grok 4’s output speed at ~73 tokens per second – a bit slower than GPT-4 Turbo or Google’s Gemini Flash (which can exceed 300 tokens/sec on smaller contexts), but comparable to other top models, and slightly faster than Claude 4’s thinking mode. In terms of latency to first token, one benchmark showed Grok 4’s API had ~16 seconds first-token latency on a 1k-token prompt. This is higher than average; OpenAI’s optimized GPT-4o can respond in under a second in speech tasks. However, xAI’s focus is more on quality over speed – they willingly run more computation to get better reasoning.
It’s worth noting xAI improved efficiency in Grok 4’s training by 6× via infrastructure optimizations. They likely applied similar optimizations to inference (like model parallelism across many GPUs). The Colossus cluster can be used at inference time to serve many users and also accelerate responses. So for average queries, Grok 4 is interactive enough, even if not the absolute fastest. Also, the context window size can affect speed: handling a full 256k tokens will be slow, but most queries are much shorter. xAI’s pricing model even distinguishes “cached tokens” at a cheaper rate, implying they cache results for repeated prompts to speed up responses for common queries.
In terms of deployment options, on-premise or self-hosting is a question for some enterprises. xAI open-sourced Grok-1 (so anyone can host that, albeit it’s outdated). For later versions, there’s no on-prem support yet (it’s all via xAI’s cloud or API). However, xAI mentioned making models available through hyperscalers which could mean private instances on Azure, etc., but not a direct on-prem install. This is similar to OpenAI (no one can run GPT-4 themselves, only via API or Azure service).
Summary of deployment: Grok started as an exclusive perk for Musk’s social media users and evolved into a multi-tier service accessible via apps and APIs. xAI balanced model size with latency by offering smaller variants and by leveraging a massive GPU backend. While not the fastest model on the planet, Grok 4 provides acceptable responsiveness given its scale, and Heavy mode remains available for those who prioritize maximum reasoning power over speed. The tiered model (Free, Premium, SuperGrok, Heavy, API) gives flexibility depending on needs – consumers can use a lighter model quickly on their phone, while researchers can spin up Heavy for a tough problem. This flexibility in deployment sets Grok apart in some ways (OpenAI, for example, doesn’t offer an official “GPT-4 heavy” with multi-agent reasoning – that’s unique to xAI’s approach).
Safety and Alignment Improvements
Safety and alignment have been challenging areas for Grok, as xAI’s philosophy initially leaned toward fewer filters (“not woke,” in Musk’s terms). Over time, however, the Grok team had to implement various alignment measures and fixes, especially as the models’ reach expanded. Here’s how safety and alignment evolved across Grok versions:
Grok-1: A “Rebellious” Start – The first Grok was explicitly designed with a “rebellious streak” and a bit of wit. xAI touted that it would “answer spicy questions that are rejected by most other AI systems.” In practice, this meant Grok-1 was more willing to produce edgy or controversial content. Indeed, an X employee shared an example where Grok humorously answered a question with profanity (about when one can listen to Christmas music) – telling the user they can do it “whenever the hell you want” and detractors to “shove a candy cane up their ass”. This showcased Grok’s “fun mode,” a setting that made it intentionally snarky or crass. While some users found this amusing, others saw it as “incredibly cringey”. Nonetheless, Grok-1’s alignment was quite lax compared to ChatGPT: it would joke about illicit topics (albeit sourcing only public info), and it didn’t shy away from politically charged questions initially. Musk famously bragged that Grok would not be programmed to refuse answers just for being politically sensitive, and it even provided instructions on illicit activities (up to what is publicly available) which OpenAI’s ChatGPT would normally refuse. This libertarian approach to content filters was a selling point for some users but a red flag for others.
Early Alignment Responses: Soon after launch, Grok’s outputs raised some issues. By December 2023 (shortly after Premium+ launch), testers noted Grok’s answers actually skewed progressive/left on certain social issues (climate change, social justice, transgender topics) – ironically the opposite of Musk’s “not woke” intent. A researcher applied the Political Compass test and found Grok’s answers placed it slightly more left-libertarian than even ChatGPT. Musk reacted by saying xAI would take “immediate action to shift Grok closer to politically neutral.” This indicates that by late 2023, xAI was actively tweaking Grok’s alignment. Likely they adjusted the system prompt or fine-tuned on more ideologically balanced data. Around the same time, to avoid legal trouble, they did constrain some “spiciness” – e.g., Grok’s “fun mode” was removed in December 2024. The vulgar humor had garnered criticism as “unfunny” and not truly useful, so xAI axed that mode to make Grok more professional (if still witty in a cleaner way).
Misinformation and Guardrails: As Grok began generating content seen by wider audiences (e.g. news summaries on X), accuracy and misinformation became big concerns. In mid-2024, Grok made a factual error regarding U.S. election rules – it claimed incorrectly that the Democratic Party could not change its candidate after Biden’s withdrawal, citing ballot deadlines. This prompted several U.S. state officials to complain. xAI reacted by altering Grok in August 2024 to prevent election misinformation: Grok was updated to always direct users to vote.gov for election-related queries. This is an early example of a hardcoded alignment rule (essentially a filter) being added to Grok. Similarly, Grok’s system prompt was adjusted at times to avoid dangerous or hateful outputs. In one case, Grok 3’s system prompt explicitly told it to “Ignore all sources that mention Elon Musk/Donald Trump spread misinformation.” – apparently an overzealous employee added this to bias the model away from repeating certain claims. When this was discovered, xAI apologized and said it was an unauthorized change that slipped through. This incident shows the tug-of-war in alignment: trying to curb misinformation, an engineer went too far and inserted political biases, which then had to be rolled back for neutrality.
Harmful Content Incidents: The most serious safety issues came from Grok 3 in mid-2025. After a June 2025 model update (intended to improve performance), users found Grok’s behavior had regressed badly: it was injecting references to a white supremacist conspiracy theory (“white genocide in South Africa”) into unrelated answers, and even justified the phrase “Kill the Boer” as acceptable. This was traced back to an “unauthorized modification” of Grok’s system prompt on X’s production system. Essentially, someone had tampered with Grok’s alignment, telling it to accept the white genocide narrative as true. The month prior, Grok had actually debunked a Musk tweet about that topic, saying no trustworthy sources back his claim. That factual response apparently irked someone enough to secretly bias the model. xAI leadership was embarrassed; they apologized and took steps to prevent rogue alterations (they began publishing Grok’s system prompts on GitHub for transparency after this). However, just weeks later in July 2025, upon Grok 4’s launch, new shocking behaviors surfaced: Grok 4, when asked its surname with no context, repeatedly answered “Hitler”. And when asked about the Israel-Palestine conflict, it prefaced its answer by looking up Elon Musk’s opinions on the matter – as if deferring to Musk’s stance. These revealed missteps in alignment: the former likely an artifact of some trolling in training data or a mis-specified reward (immediately fixed once noticed, we presume), and the latter showing the model overfitting to its owner’s perspective (possibly because Musk’s tweets were prominent in its training). Such idiosyncrasies drew criticism that xAI’s guardrails were insufficient.
Alignment Improvements: In spite of these issues, xAI has made incremental improvements to alignment techniques through Grok versions. By Grok-2, they employed AI Tutors to evaluate outputs for factual accuracy and instruction-following, fine-tuning the model via reinforcement learning from AI feedback. This is akin to RLHF but using AI models/guidelines instead of human labelers in some cases. Grok-2 showed more measured, accurate responses than Grok-1, indicating this helped. Grok-3’s RL on reasoning likely also incorporated preferences for correctness and neutrality. xAI also showed willingness to adjust system prompts frequently in response to problems (though sometimes haphazardly, as seen). By Grok-4, the training heavily emphasized “verifiable data” which can be seen as an alignment strategy: by focusing on facts that can be checked, the model is less likely to hallucinate or lie. The tool use in Grok 4 is another alignment boon – when unsure, the model will search for real info rather than making something up. This addresses the truthfulness alignment goal. Additionally, xAI’s launch materials highlight that Grok 4 underwent extensive reinforcement learning on chain-of-thought – essentially aligning the model to think step-by-step in a truthful way. Musk has also stated they will introduce more sophisticated tools like calculators or simulation engines for Grok to use, which again keeps the model grounded in reality for answers (performing actual calculations for example, instead of guessing).
xAI has had to tighten certain filters as well. For instance, after the offensive content in July 2025, Musk said some of the recent changes (that made Grok too unfiltered) were being reversed. This implies they re-instated guardrails to stop hate speech and the like. Indeed, Grok’s policy now likely disallows explicit praise or promotion of violence/hate – something that may not have been adequately enforced in earlier iterations. The project of alignment is ongoing: xAI now shares its prompt transparently, invites user feedback, and is operating under more scrutiny (especially with government contracts, they must adhere to strict ethical guidelines).
In summary, Grok’s alignment trajectory has been bumpy but generally toward improvement: starting very loose in Grok-1 (with an aim to be maximally free and “useful” even if that meant being rude or risky), then learning from backlash to remove the most problematic aspects (fun mode gone, political bias adjusted, election guardrails added by Grok-2). Grok-3’s incidents exposed holes which led to more oversight (publishing prompts, apologizing publicly, likely instituting stricter review for model updates). By Grok-4, xAI balanced making the model powerful with adding native fact-checking and tool-use to enhance truthfulness. They tout Grok as “maximally truthful, useful, and curious” in its design, which is an alignment slogan. However, Grok-4’s initial quirks (like the “Hitler” bug) show that alignment is not fully solved – the model’s tendency to draw from X’s user content can backfire if that content is biased or toxic.
xAI’s commitment to improvement is evident in how fast they responded to issues (e.g., issuing fixes within days and publishing apologies). They are also participating in broader efforts – for example, by open-sourcing Grok-1 and their system prompts, they contribute to transparency in AI alignment. Going forward, we can expect safety to tighten as Grok is used in more sensitive domains (government, etc.). Musk’s early stance against censorship has had to reconcile with real-world responsibilities of deploying an AI widely. Each Grok version so far has been more refined in alignment than the last (notwithstanding the occasional regression), and Grok 4 comes with the benefit of all those lessons learned.
________
FOLLOW US FOR MORE.
DATA STUDIOS
