How function calling and tool use work in advanced AI models
- Graziano Stefanelli
- Aug 30
- 4 min read

The mechanisms behind structured outputs, API integration, and multi-step automation in ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.
Function calling has transformed AI chatbots from passive conversational agents into active orchestrators capable of executing tasks, interacting with external systems, and generating structured outputs. Modern AI models like ChatGPT-5, Claude Opus, and Gemini 2.5 Pro have evolved beyond simple text generation by embedding specialized tool-use frameworks directly into their transformer architectures.
This article explores the technical foundations of function calling, explains how leading chatbots implement tool integration differently, and compares their performance in structured reasoning, API automation, and multi-step workflows.
Function calling enables AI models to act, not just respond.
Structured request-response pipelines allow chatbots to interact with APIs, databases, and external tools without breaking conversational flow.
Traditionally, LLMs produced free-form text outputs, which made them unsuitable for structured operations like triggering APIs, generating JSON schemas, or chaining multi-step tasks. Function calling introduces a formalized interface where the model outputs a structured JSON object instead of natural language.
Component | Role in Function Calling | Example |
Schema Definition | Specifies the available functions and required arguments | { "function": "get_stock_price", "params": {...} } |
Model Invocation | The LLM decides when to call a function based on the query | "Please fetch latest Tesla stock" → triggers API |
Execution Layer | Sends structured request to API or service | REST, GraphQL, SQL |
Response Integration | Feeds tool output back into the model context | Model summarizes API response |
This architecture allows AI chatbots to handle workflows like fetching weather data, analyzing spreadsheets, querying SQL databases, or summarizing PDFs without manual intervention.
OpenAI ChatGPT integrates native function calling and tool orchestration.
GPT-4o and GPT-5 embed tool use deeply in the transformer stack, enabling seamless multi-step workflows.
OpenAI introduced function calling in GPT-4 Turbo, later refining it in GPT-4o and GPT-5. Unlike earlier models, GPT-5 integrates tool-awareness directly into the attention layers, allowing it to plan, call, and interpret results more efficiently.
Key technical features in ChatGPT’s implementation:
JSON-native outputs: GPT models can produce exact structured schemas matching API specs.
Automatic tool selection: The model decides when and which function to call without explicit prompting.
Multi-step orchestration: GPT-5 supports chaining multiple API calls for complex tasks.
Integrated memory retrieval: Tool results persist in context, enabling adaptive reasoning.
Feature | GPT-4 Turbo | GPT-4o | GPT-5 |
Output Type | Text + JSON hybrid | JSON-native | Fully schema-validated |
Multi-step Support | Limited | Partial | Yes, deeply embedded |
Multimodal Tools | No | Yes (images, tables, audio) | Full cross-modal |
Orchestration | Manual | Semi-automatic | Autonomous chaining |
With GPT-5, OpenAI also introduced persistent tool contexts — allowing multi-turn conversations to reuse results fetched earlier without repeating function calls.
Claude uses semantic tool use with reflection-driven decisions.
Anthropic focuses on safety, structured accuracy, and human-like validation before executing external actions.
Claude Opus and Claude Sonnet support function calling, but their approach differs from OpenAI’s. Anthropic uses a semantic intent classifier within the transformer pipeline to decide whether a function call should be triggered. Before sending a request, Claude internally reflects on the relevance and safety of the action.
Claude’s design emphasizes:
Safety-first function routing: Claude validates the intent before calling any external API.
Confidence-weighted execution: If model certainty is low, it may summarize options rather than act.
JSON schema adherence: Claude maintains high reliability in structured data outputs.
Chained reasoning with external tools: Particularly effective for PDF parsing, financial data retrieval, and complex analytics.
Claude Model | Function Calling Support | Strengths | Limitations |
Claude 3 Sonnet | Partial schema-based | Good at structured documents | No native multimodal APIs |
Claude 3 Opus | Yes, reflection-driven | Consistent tool handling | Lower automation depth |
Claude 4.1 Opus | Advanced JSON + semantic mapping | Best accuracy for complex APIs | Slower in multi-step tasks |
Claude’s reflective loop makes it better suited for enterprise-grade integrations, where compliance, auditability, and correctness take priority over raw speed.
Gemini integrates deep grounding and tool execution within Google’s ecosystem.
Gemini’s function calling combines multimodal embeddings, retrieval grounding, and live data fusion.
Gemini 2.5 Pro offers the most data-integrated function calling framework among top chatbots, thanks to its native connection with Google Search, Workspace APIs, and Knowledge Graphs. Unlike ChatGPT and Claude, Gemini prioritizes real-time external grounding.
Key technical differentiators:
Native Google integration: Accesses Drive, Sheets, Gmail, Docs, and Knowledge Graph APIs directly.
Dynamic schema adaptation: Can infer missing function parameters based on retrieved context.
Hybrid reasoning + retrieval: Combines tool outputs with RAG-enhanced embeddings for more accurate results.
Cross-modal orchestration: Handles vision, text, and audio functions simultaneously.
Gemini Model | Function Calling Support | Grounding Capability | Best Use Cases |
Gemini 1.5 Pro | Basic JSON schemas | Limited | Document parsing |
Gemini 2.5 Flash | Optimized for speed | Partial grounding | Fast data lookups |
Gemini 2.5 Pro | Full orchestration engine | Native Google grounding | Multi-tool enterprise workflows |
Gemini’s ability to natively fuse external APIs with multimodal embeddings makes it particularly effective in analytics, financial modeling, and enterprise dashboards.
Comparison of function calling and tool use across AI chatbots.
Feature | ChatGPT (GPT-5) | Claude Opus | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
Schema Compliance | Full JSON-native | High | Dynamic schema mapping |
Tool Automation | Fully autonomous | Reflection-driven | Integrated with retrieval |
Chained Execution | Yes, multi-step | Limited | Yes, API-first |
Multimodal Tool Use | Fully supported | Partial | Fully supported |
Grounding | Tool-based retrieval | Minimal | Native Google integration |
Best For | General-purpose workflows | Accuracy-critical APIs | Complex enterprise pipelines |
The evolution of tool use changes how chatbots operate.
GPT-5 dominates automation, Claude optimizes accuracy, and Gemini leads integration.
ChatGPT-5Â focuses on autonomous orchestration, enabling multi-step workflows that blend reasoning, data access, and structured output generation.
Claude Opus prioritizes controlled execution, favoring reflective reasoning and compliance-focused validation before using tools.
Gemini 2.5 Pro integrates deep grounding and Google ecosystem APIs, making it the most capable chatbot for enterprise automation.
Function calling has turned modern LLMs into actionable AI agents, expanding their capabilities far beyond conversational tasks — enabling automation across analytics, research, and business operations.
____________
FOLLOW US FOR MORE.
DATA STUDIOS

