How receivable factoring and securitization affect derecognition under IFRS 9 and ASC 860

Graziano Stefanelli
3 minutes ago
5 min read

Receivables are frequently monetized through factoring, invoice discounting, and securitization conduits. The core accounting question is whether the transferor has transferred substantially all risks and rewards (IFRS 9) or has achieved a true sale and surrendered control (ASC 860). Getting derecognition wrong distorts leverage, working capital, and cash flow presentation, especially when programs include recourse, subordination, or continuing involvement clauses.

·····

.....

How common structures work and why details matter.

Typical programs include: non-recourse factoring, recourse factoring, supplier portals with credit insurance, ABCP conduits, and term securitizations with tranching. Cash economics often resemble financing even when legal documents say “sale.” Accounting follows substance over form: credit risk retention, first-loss positions, and call/clean-up options often prevent derecognition.

Example landscape:

Structure	Who holds first loss	Servicing retained?	Usual outcome
Plain non-recourse factoring	Purchaser	Sometimes	Often derecognition
Recourse factoring (price-protected)	Transferor	Usually	Often continues as financing
Securitization with junior tranche retained	Transferor (via subordinated notes)	Yes	Partial/failed derecognition; continuing involvement
Insured factoring with limited recourse (deductible)	Transferor shares loss up to deductible	Often	Frequently financing unless risk transfer is substantive

·····

.....

IFRS 9 derecognition logic focuses on risks and rewards, then control.

Step 1 — Transfer of contractual rights.Has the entity transferred the contractual rights to cash flows? If no, derecognition is off the table.

Step 2 — Risks and rewards test.

Substantially all transferred → derecognize.
Substantially all retained → continue to recognize (treat as collateralized borrowing).
Neither transferred nor retained → go to Step 3.

Step 3 — Control test.If control is surrendered (e.g., transferee can sell assets freely), derecognize the asset and recognize any continuing involvement. If control is retained, continue to recognize to the extent of continuing involvement.

Continuing involvement examples (IFRS 9):

Servicer advances with limited recourse.
Written guarantees/recourse capped at an amount.
Retained interest (IO strip, subordinated note).

Measurement requires recognizing the retained exposure at fair value, with subsequent measurement depending on classification.

Journal entry — derecognition with retained first-loss cap (example):

Dr Cash (proceeds) 9,700,000
Dr Retained Interest (FV) 180,000
Cr Trade Receivables 9,800,000
Cr Gain on Transfer 80,000

If risks are largely retained (e.g., full recourse), treat as secured borrowing:

Dr Cash 9,700,000
Cr Borrowings 9,700,000

(Receivables remain on balance sheet; disclose pledge.)

·····

.....

ASC 860 emphasizes legal isolation, transferee’s rights, and control.

ASC 860 requires all of the following for sale accounting:

Legal isolation of the receivables from the transferor (bankruptcy-remote).
Transferee’s right to pledge or exchange the assets without constraints.
Effective control surrendered by the transferor (no call/cleanup beyond customary, no agreement to repurchase except standard reps & warranties).

If any criterion fails, account as a secured borrowing. Even if sale criteria are met, continuing involvement (e.g., recourse obligations, servicing) is recognized separately (guarantee liability, servicing asset/liability).

Journal entry — sale with servicing retained (US GAAP):

Dr Cash 9,700,000
Dr Servicing Asset 60,000
Cr Trade Receivables 9,800,000
Cr Gain on Sale (balancing)

Secured borrowing outcome (fail sale test):

Dr Cash 9,700,000
Cr Secured Borrowing 9,700,000

(Receivables stay; interest expense recognized over time.)

·····

.....

Comparative framework — IFRS 9 vs ASC 860 in one view.

Topic	IFRS 9	ASC 860
Primary test	Risks & rewards first; then control	Legal isolation, transferee rights, control surrendered
Retained first-loss piece	Often → continuing involvement (partial derecognition) or financing	Often fails sale unless isolation and control criteria still met
Servicing retained	Continuing involvement; servicing asset/liability if fees ≠ adequate compensation	Recognize servicing asset/liability at fair value; sale still possible if criteria met
Clean-up call	If substantive, may indicate control retained	Permitted only if it is minor and not a substantive repurchase right
Disclosure	Nature of transfer, risks retained, CI measurement, cash flows	Qualitative & quantitative transfer disclosures, securitization tables, guarantees

·····

.....

Worked examples that show the boundary.

A) Non-recourse factoring with limited dilutions risk (IFRS derecognition likely)

Facts:

Portfolio: €10,000,000 face; advance 97%.
Factor assumes credit risk; transferor covers price adjustments for returns up to 1% of face.

IFRS 9 assessment:Most credit risk (key risk) transferred; residual 1% exposure is not substantially all. Control given up. → Derecognition.

Entries:

Dr Cash 9,700,000
Dr CI Asset (cap for returns) 100,000
Cr Trade Receivables 10,000,000
Cr Gain/Loss on Transfer (balancing)

ASC 860:If legal isolation and transferee’s unrestricted rights exist, and the 1% cap is only a guarantee, sale may still qualify with a guarantee liability recognized.

B) Recourse factoring with full credit risk back to seller (financing likely)

Facts:

Same portfolio, but transferor indemnifies all credit losses; factor earns fee + interest.

IFRS 9:Substantially all risks retained → no derecognition. Account as secured borrowing.

ASC 860:Even with legal isolation, effective control is often deemed retained due to broad recourse → secured borrowing.

C) Securitization with subordinated note retained (partial derecognition vs sale)

Facts:

Transferor sells €100,000,000 receivables to SPV; retains €10,000,000 first-loss note and services the pool.

IFRS 9:Neither substantially all transferred nor retained → assess control. If transferee can pledge and transferor lacks call rights, derecognize senior piece and recognize continuing involvement equal to retained note and any recourse.

ASC 860:Sale may qualify if isolation and transferee rights are met; recognize retained interest at FV and servicing asset; disclose continuing involvement.

·····

.....

Measurement of continuing involvement, guarantees, and servicing.

IFRS 9 continuing involvement (CI):Measure at lower of (i) the asset’s carrying amount and (ii) the maximum exposure to variability (e.g., first-loss cap). The CI liability/asset is subsequently measured based on its nature (often FVPL or amortized cost with ECL where appropriate).

ASC 860 servicing:Recognize servicing asset when expected fees exceed adequate compensation, or servicing liability when below; subsequently measure at amortization or fair value (policy election by class). Recourse is a separate guarantee liability under ASC 460.

Journal snippets:

Dr/Liability — Recourse Obligation (FV) xx
Cr Gain on Transfer (reduce) xx
Dr Servicing Asset xx / Cr Gain on Transfer xx

·····

.....

Cash flow statement and ratio impacts you must control.

Financing vs operating: If derecognition fails, proceeds are financing inflows; collections remain operating. Derecognition shifts cash to operating inflow via reduced receivables.
Leverage and working capital: Financing classification inflates debt and trade receivables, worsening liquidity ratios; derecognition reduces receivables and debt.
Interest coverage: Programs accounted as borrowing add interest expense; true sales reclassify economics into loss on sale/fees.

·····

.....

Disclosure package that avoids surprises.

IFRS 7 / IFRS 9: nature of transfers, quantum of continuing involvement, maximum exposure to loss, maturity analysis of undiscounted cash outflows, and gains/losses on derecognition.

ASC 860: description of transfer agreements, carrying amounts of assets derecognized, cash proceeds, gains/losses, servicing/recourse obligations, and sensitivity of retained interests (key assumptions like prepayment, default, discount rates).

Illustrative table — retained interests sensitivity (period end):

Assumption	Base	+100 bps discount	−100 bps discount
Fair value of IO/sub note (€000)	1,850	1,790	1,915
Gain recognized (€000)	120	60	185

·····

.....

Journal entries summary.

Derecognition achieved (IFRS 9 / ASC 860):

Dr Cash (proceeds) xx
Dr Retained Interest / Servicing Asset xx
Cr Trade Receivables xx
Cr Gain/Loss on Transfer xx

Secured borrowing (failure of sale/derecognition):

Dr Cash xx
Cr Borrowings / Secured Financing xx

(Receivables remain; interest recognized over time.)

Continuing involvement / recourse set-up:

Dr/Cr CI Asset or Liability (FV) xx
Dr/Cr Gain on Transfer (plug) xx

·····

.....

Operational considerations for controllable outcomes.

Structure first-loss carefully: Caps that leave only trivial exposure support derecognition; broad recourse does not.
Avoid substantive calls: Clean-up calls must be minor and not an effective repurchase.
Document isolation: Legal true-sale and bankruptcy-remoteness opinions are critical under ASC 860.
Price servicing explicitly: So that servicing asset/liability is measured cleanly at inception.
ECL and vintage tracking (IFRS): If continuing involvement remains, ensure expected credit loss models capture retained exposure.

Transparently designed and documented transfer programs deliver the liquidity benefits of receivable monetization without misclassifying debt as sales.

·····

.....

DATA STUDIOS

..... [datastudios.org]