Precedent transaction analysis: valuing a company based on historical deal multiples

Precedent transaction analysis—often called transaction comps—is a relative valuation method that determines a company’s value by examining prices paid for similar companies in past mergers and acquisitions (M&A).

Unlike comparable company analysis, which reflects trading values in public markets, precedent transactions capture control premiums and strategic considerations embedded in actual deal prices.

The rationale behind precedent transaction analysis.

The premise is that the market value of a company can be inferred from what acquirers have historically paid for similar businesses.

Because these deals involve a change of control, the valuation typically includes a premium over the prevailing market price of the target.

Key steps in conducting precedent transaction analysis.

1. Identify relevant transactions 

   - Same industry or sector. 

   - Similar size, geographic market, and business model. 

   - Comparable financial profile (growth, margins, risk).

2. Gather transaction details 

   - Purchase price and deal structure (cash, stock, earnouts). 

   - Date of the transaction (adjusting for market conditions at the time). 

   - Financial metrics of the target at the deal date.

3. Calculate deal multiples Common valuation multiples in precedent transactions include:

Multiple	Formula	Purpose
EV / Revenue	Enterprise Value ÷ Revenue at time of deal	Useful for low-profit or early-stage companies
EV / EBITDA	Enterprise Value ÷ EBITDA at time of deal	Core profitability comparison
P / E	Price per Share ÷ Earnings per Share	Equity-focused metric
EV / EBIT	Enterprise Value ÷ EBIT at time of deal	Capital-structure-neutral profitability

4. Adjust for control premiums Public market prices are increased to reflect the premium paid for control, often ranging from 20% to 40% depending on industry and deal dynamics.

5. Apply multiples to the target company Example: If recent deals in the sector had a median EV/EBITDA of 9× and the target’s EBITDA is $60m, implied EV = $540m.

Advantages of precedent transaction analysis.

• Real-world pricing: Based on actual amounts paid in completed deals.

• Captures strategic value: Includes synergies, market entry considerations, and competitive bidding effects.

• Reflects control premiums: Accounts for the extra value an acquirer may be willing to pay.

Limitations and challenges.

• Market timing sensitivity: Past deal values may not reflect current market or economic conditions.

• Limited sample size: Few truly comparable deals may exist.

• Data availability: Detailed transaction terms may be private.

Risk Factor	Effect on Analysis
Economic cycle differences	May overstate or understate current value
Unique target characteristics	Reduces comparability of multiples
Changes in industry dynamics	Outdated relevance of historical data

Best practice in using transaction comps.

• Use recent transactions to better reflect current market conditions.

• Adjust for deal-specific factors such as synergies or distressed sales.

• Pair with DCF and trading comps for a comprehensive valuation view.

Under US GAAP and IFRS, precedent transactions are not a required valuation method but are widely used in fairness opinions, M&A negotiations, and strategic investment decisions.They provide a realistic market benchmark that reflects the prices strategic and financial buyers are willing to pay, offering a practical complement to intrinsic valuation models.

____________

FOLLOW US FOR MORE.

DATA STUDIOS

datastudios.org