top of page

Tracking stock structures and their use in spin-offs

ree

A tracking stock is a special class of equity issued by a parent company to represent the financial performance of a specific division or business unit. Unlike a spin-off, the underlying assets remain legally part of the parent company, but the tracking stock allows the market to value the tracked segment independently. This hybrid structure has been used strategically in corporate restructurings, particularly when a company wants to highlight the value of a high-growth division without fully separating it.



Tracking stocks offer a way to unlock hidden value.

Many diversified companies operate units with vastly different growth rates, margins, or capital needs. When a high-performing division is undervalued due to consolidated financial reporting, issuing a tracking stock can:

  • Create a distinct market valuation for the business

  • Attract investors specifically interested in the tracked unit

  • Provide a currency for M&A or equity-based compensation

  • Preserve strategic control while giving visibility to financial performance

Because the tracked business remains part of the legal entity, the parent retains operational integration, tax consolidation, and governance flexibility.



Structure and mechanics distinguish tracking stocks from spin-offs.

A tracking stock does not grant ownership in the underlying business assets. Instead, it entitles shareholders to returns based on the performance of the targeted division. The main features of tracking stock structures include:

Feature

Tracking Stock

Spin-Off

Ownership of assets

Remains with parent company

Transfers to new independent entity

Financial reporting

Segmented but consolidated

Fully separated financials

Governance

Controlled by parent’s board

Independent board post-separation

Investor base

Targeted to division-specific investors

Free-market determination post-spin

Tax treatment

No immediate tax implications

May be tax-free if structured under IRS §355

Control

Parent maintains operational control

Fully independent management

Tracking stocks aim to balance the capital market benefits of separation with the corporate control advantages of integration.



Use cases include high-growth, volatile, or non-core units.

Tracking stocks are most commonly issued to highlight a division that has:

  • Faster growth or higher valuation multiples than the parent

  • Distinct customer bases or business models

  • Significant investor interest independent from the core business

  • A potential IPO or spin-off in the future


Examples of divisions that have been tracked include:

  • Technology or digital businesses inside legacy conglomerates

  • Media subsidiaries within telecom groups

  • Semiconductor units inside broader electronics firms

The structure allows companies to test market appetite and establish a valuation benchmark before committing to a full separation.


Historical examples illustrate strategic applications.

Tracking stocks have appeared in major corporate transactions, often during industry transitions or portfolio realignments. Notable cases include:

  • AT&T Wireless Group (2000) – Tracking stock issued by AT&T for its mobile division, later spun off and merged with Cingular

  • Liberty Media – Issued multiple tracking stocks (Liberty SiriusXM, Liberty Braves, Liberty Formula One) to reflect diverse media holdings

  • The Walt Disney Company – Considered issuing a tracking stock for its streaming business to separate it from legacy media valuation

These structures have been used to manage investor expectations, segregate risk, and prepare for future divestitures.


Risks include complexity, governance conflicts, and market skepticism.

Despite their strategic appeal, tracking stocks come with significant drawbacks:

  • Governance misalignment – Tracked shareholders may lack voting rights or board representation

  • Conflicts of interest – Parent company decisions may favor one group of shareholders over another

  • Accounting opacity – While segment reporting is required, the lack of full separation can confuse investors

  • Limited market enthusiasm – Tracking stocks often trade at a discount due to uncertainty and control issues

Investor perception is critical. If the market views the structure as a cosmetic move or temporary workaround, it may fail to deliver the intended valuation benefit.


Tax and regulatory considerations affect long-term viability.

Unlike spin-offs, tracking stock issuances typically do not trigger immediate tax consequences for shareholders. However, future transactions—such as asset transfers, mergers, or liquidation—may involve tax events. Additionally:

  • SEC disclosures must clearly delineate financials and risks of the tracked division

  • Any future conversion or redemption terms must be carefully outlined

  • If the tracking stock is later merged, acquired, or spun off, the transition must comply with both tax and securities regulations

Legal and tax structuring plays a central role in ensuring the tracking stock achieves its purpose without creating contingent liabilities.


Tracking stock can be a strategic step toward full separation.

In many cases, tracking stock is an intermediate phase used to set the stage for an IPO or spin-off. It allows the parent to:

  • Establish public valuation benchmarks

  • Test capital market appetite

  • Structure employee compensation aligned to the division

  • Retain optionality to proceed with or delay full separation

This approach provides flexibility in volatile markets, especially for businesses undergoing digital transformation, restructuring, or strategic realignment.


While the structure is less common today than in the early 2000s, it remains a powerful tool for financial signaling and investor targeting when deployed with clear strategic intent.



____________

FOLLOW US FOR MORE.


DATA STUDIOS


bottom of page