Which Costs Make the Most Sense to Exclude When Assessing Profitability?

Feb 8

Excluding certain expenses from profitability calculations depends on the goal of the analysis and the type of insights needed. However, it makes the most sense to exclude (or at least analyze separately) costs that do not reflect the company’s core operations and ability to generate margins. Below are the key ones...

1. Depreciation & Amortization

Why exclude them? These are non-cash expenses (no actual cash outflow occurs each month) and are based on accounting and tax decisions regarding how an asset’s cost is allocated over time.
Impact on analysis: Excluding them (e.g., through EBITDA) provides a clearer view of operational profitability and potential cash flows.

2. Interest Expenses

Why exclude them? They depend on a company's financial structure (level of debt, banking conditions, etc.), not on its intrinsic ability to generate profits.
Impact on analysis: Excluding interest makes it easier to compare companies with different financing structures but similar profit potential.

3. Extraordinary or One-Time Costs

Why exclude them? These expenses (or revenues) are non-recurring and do not reflect day-to-day operations—examples include restructuring costs, significant legal settlements, or one-off contract penalties.
Impact on analysis: Removing these items provides a clearer view of the company’s underlying profitability without distortion from sporadic events.

4. Rent (in Certain Contexts)

Why (sometimes) exclude it? Rent can vary significantly based on location and lease agreements. A business operating in an expensive area might appear less profitable than one in a low-cost region, even if both generate the same level of operational earnings. Separating rent from profitability analysis helps to assess whether the business itself is efficient, regardless of location-based costs.
Impact on analysis: When comparing businesses, excluding rent provides a neutral perspective on operational performance before factoring in location-specific costs.

5. Certain Consulting or Project-Specific Expenses

Why (sometimes) exclude them? If they are tied to one-time initiatives (e.g., implementing new software, conducting a special audit), they may artificially inflate costs for a given period without reflecting long-term trends.
Impact on analysis: Excluding these "one-shot" expenses provides a clearer picture of ongoing business operations.

_____________

So... the costs worth excluding or highlighting separately are those unrelated to regular operations or heavily influenced by accounting, financial, or location-specific choices (such as rent for a high-cost area).

The key objective is to understand the real "engine" of profitability—how much a company can generate purely from its core activities—while transparently separating external influences such as financing decisions, rental costs, or exceptional events.

By doing this, investors, analysts, and managers can compare performance across different businesses more accurately and make better-informed decisions about a company’s growth and profit potential.