Who chooses ChatGPT and who Copilot for Coding in 2025? In‑Depth Analysis on User Profiles, Habits, and Trends in Companies and for Freelancers

In what ways do different types of users employ ChatGPT today in the programming world?

The current group of ChatGPT users has expanded enormously compared to the early years of AI assistant adoption: whereas in the beginning, the platform was almost exclusively considered a tool for dialogue and text generation, today it has become a benchmark for programming and daily development support, especially for those still in the learning phase or working in contexts where versatility and the ability to quickly adapt to cross-cutting requests are crucial factors. University students, as well as anyone learning the fundamentals of programming—whether Python, JavaScript, SQL, VBA, or other languages—find in ChatGPT an ally that does not just suggest a line of code, but accompanies step by step in error analysis, explanation of underlying logic, and adaptation of solutions to real scenarios, facilitating learning through a conversational approach that breaks down initial technical barriers.

In 2025, a real ecosystem of freelancers and “solo” professionals has emerged, who regularly rely on ChatGPT as a “second-line” support for solving out-of-the-ordinary problems, generating complex snippets, refactoring legacy code, or simply getting advice on best practices and industry updates. Additionally, ChatGPT has become widespread among those who do not engage in continuous development, such as product managers, marketers, analysts, consultants, project managers, and hybrid roles who need to write or adapt code to automate workflows, extract data, or work with Excel, Sheets, or databases, without the need to master every language or specific environment. According to official OpenAI data updated to July 2025, the platform now exceeds 100 million weekly active users, with an ever-growing percentage of queries dedicated to programming, debugging, task automation solutions, and technical documentation generation in natural language.

What categories of companies and teams have adopted Copilot as an essential tool for daily development?

In recent years, the growth of GitHub Copilot has been driven mainly by its ability to seamlessly integrate into the workflows of professional developers, structured companies, and DevOps teams, where the top priorities are constant productivity, collaboration, and code consistency in medium- and large-scale projects. Copilot has established itself as the true “digital co-pilot,” accompanying developers directly inside the most popular integrated development environments (IDEs)—such as Visual Studio Code, IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, Rider, and many others—offering real-time suggestions, intelligent completions based on file context and entire repositories, automatic function generation, and even proposals for corrections and stylistic improvements that reflect company policies or project parameters.

Companies that have adopted Copilot Enterprise stand out for their strong focus on efficiency, version control, error reduction, and scalable development processes, thanks to tools that not only speed up code writing but also automate review, test generation, and large-scale refactoring. According to Microsoft data updated to mid-2025, there are over 1.8 million paying developers, a number that testifies to how Copilot has now become a de facto standard among those working on shared repositories, mission-critical projects, complex applications, and CI/CD pipelines, with ongoing growth in the enterprise sector and increased interest among tech startups aiming to scale rapidly with agile teams.

In which practical and daily scenarios do users prefer to rely on ChatGPT rather than Copilot?

The real strength of ChatGPT emerges in contexts where the goal is not just to quickly produce working code, but to deeply understand the underlying logic, explore alternative solutions, engage in self-learning, or solve “open-ended” problems that go beyond simple typing in an IDE. In these cases, ChatGPT’s ability to engage in dialogue, explain steps, detail the reasoning behind choices, and illustrate the theory behind implementations is fundamental, especially for those who want not just to “use” but to learn and master the craft of programming.

For example, a university student tackling a complex project or assignment can use ChatGPT to get targeted clarifications on functions, data structures, algorithms, or the differences between approaches... Those who work in transversal roles, such as professionals who operate between business and technology, also find ChatGPT the ideal tool to quickly produce scripts, automations, or small support apps without the need to configure sophisticated environments or maintain advanced development pipelines. The ability to get ready-to-paste code for Excel, Google Sheets, SQL, or SaaS tools is one of the key advantages that set ChatGPT apart from tools natively integrated in IDEs.

What are the work contexts where Copilot becomes indispensable and irreplaceable?

When it comes to structured professional development, the difference is made by speed, precision, and the ability to work collaboratively on large codebases. Here, Copilot is irreplaceable because it fits directly into the IDE workflow, offering suggestions that take into account the current context, imported libraries, project structure, and existing coding conventions in the repository. In teamwork, Copilot promotes stylistic consistency, supports writing automated tests, suggests pinpointed refactorings, and accelerates the time-to-market of even highly complex applications.

Corporate teams, especially those engaged in continuous development and frequent releases of new features, benefit greatly from Copilot because they can reduce downtime, avoid common mistakes, and standardize how code is written, reviewed, and deployed. Its integration with GitHub and CI/CD tools ensures that the entire development process, from initial writing to final deployment, is AI-supported in a transparent way, without interruptions or unnecessary manual steps.

What differences emerge in the habits and workflows between those who use ChatGPT and those who use Copilot daily?

If you analyze data collected from developer communities, technical blogs, and industry platforms, it becomes clear that Copilot is the dominant tool during code writing and editing, where completion speed, suggestion consistency, and contextual depth really make a difference for those working daily on shared code or projects requiring ongoing maintenance. ChatGPT, on the other hand, is mainly used before (to prepare scripts, test ideas, understand concepts) and after (to optimize, document, explain, and validate the work done).

In many cases, the two tools are used together: a session might start with a ChatGPT query to clarify a doubt or generate a snippet for inspiration, and then switch to Copilot for refining everything directly within the IDE, leveraging automations and real-time suggestions. This synergy is one of the main trends of 2025, with a growing convergence between “generalist” and “specialist” tools in the development world.

How are choices between ChatGPT and Copilot evolving among companies, freelancers, and hybrid teams in 2025?

The 2025 trend shows strong growth in the joint adoption of ChatGPT and Copilot, especially among innovative companies aiming to equip themselves with a complete “toolbox” for every phase of software development. Freelancers and small digital agencies tend to prefer ChatGPT for its versatility, accessibility, and ability to generate value even beyond pure coding. Corporate teams, instead, choose Copilot as the standard for internal productivity, shared repository management, and structured collaboration, leveraging advanced integrations and enterprise plans.

The real key lies in usage flexibility: those facing multiple scenarios—from business support to automation, from internal training to documentation—rely on ChatGPT to cover the full cycle, while those immersed in ongoing development on large codebases cannot give up Copilot’s features. Looking ahead, it is likely that more and more developers will alternate or combine the two tools, adapting their choices to the specific needs of the moment and the work context.

______

FOLLOW US FOR MORE.

DATA STUDIOS

datastudios.org