ChatGPT vs. DeepSeek vs. Google Gemini: Full Report and Comparison on Features, Capabilities, Pricing, and more (August 2025 Updated)
- Graziano Stefanelli
- Aug 5
- 25 min read
Overview and Latest Versions (as of Aug 2025)
ChatGPT (OpenAI): ChatGPT is powered by OpenAI’s GPT series. As of August 2025, the latest deployed model is GPT-4, with prior versions like GPT-3.5 used for the free tier. OpenAI has hinted that GPT-5 is imminent (expected August 2025). GPT-4 remains a state-of-the-art model (~1 trillion parameters, exact details undisclosed) trained on a vast corpus of internet text, code, and more (cutoff ~2021) with fine-tuning and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). ChatGPT Plus (paid) users get GPT-4 access, including its advanced reasoning and larger context window (8K tokens by default, up to 32K via API), while free users get GPT-3.5. OpenAI’s models are closed-source.
DeepSeek: DeepSeek is a Chinese AI startup that released its chatbot in Jan 2025. Its latest models are DeepSeek-V3 (general-purpose) and DeepSeek-R1 (reasoning-optimized), both open-sourced under MIT License. V3 (released Mar 24, 2025) is a Mixture-of-Experts Transformer with 671B total parameters (37B active per token), trained on 14.8 trillion tokens; R1 (released May 28, 2025) is specialized for complex, long-form reasoning and was used as a teacher model to distill reasoning skills into V3. DeepSeek’s models are open-source and freely available – a major differentiator from ChatGPT and Gemini.
Gemini (Google DeepMind): Gemini refers to Google’s family of next-generation AI models (announced in 2023, with major updates in 2024–2025). The latest iteration is Gemini 2.5, with Gemini 2.5 Pro being the flagship model as of mid-2025. Google has not published parameter counts, but it’s a large-scale model comparable to GPT-4 in capability (likely hundreds of billions of parameters, trained on diverse web, code, and multimedia data). Gemini 2.5 introduced “adaptive thinking,” effectively chain-of-thought style reasoning built into the model’s responses. Earlier versions (Gemini 1.0, 2.0) have been succeeded by 2.5. Multiple Gemini variants exist to target different needs: Pro (max capability), Flash (fast, cost-optimized), Flash-Lite (lightweight), and even on-device Gemini Nano models for Android. Gemini is offered via Google’s platforms rather than as a standalone app, powering services like Bard (Google’s chat interface) and developer APIs.
General Capabilities Comparison
All three systems are advanced general-purpose AI, but they have differing strengths in reasoning, creativity, factual accuracy, coding, and multimodal abilities:
Reasoning and Complex Problem Solving: All three excel at reasoning, with their latest models demonstrating advanced logical and analytical skills. ChatGPT (GPT-4) was a leader in reasoning tasks in 2023–2024, achieving around 87% on academic benchmarks like MMLU. DeepSeek-R1 was explicitly optimized for deeper reasoning (“long chain-of-thought” solutions) and those techniques were distilled into V3, making DeepSeek very competitive in logic, math, and science. In fact, DeepSeek-V3 matches or exceeds GPT-4’s performance on many reasoning benchmarks. Gemini 2.5 Pro has gone further – it’s described as a “thinking” model that tops human preference leaderboards for quality reasoning (ranked #1 on LMArena). Gemini 2.5 Pro achieved state-of-the-art results on challenging math and science tests (e.g. setting new records on AIME 2025 and GPQA reasoning competitions). In summary, all three are strong in reasoning, but Gemini 2.5 and DeepSeek-V3/R1 have edged out prior models; for example, Gemini 2.5 Pro outperforms OpenAI’s experimental GPT-4.5 on internal tests, and DeepSeek-V3 was praised for “super impressive” performance by AI leaders.
Creativity and Content Generation: ChatGPT established itself as a creative tool, capable of producing stories, poems, marketing copy, etc., with a high degree of coherence and imagination. It has been fine-tuned with human feedback to follow prompts in creative directions while maintaining style and context. DeepSeek similarly can generate creative content (its open model can be prompted for stories, code comments, essays, etc.), though its style may be influenced by its training (including distilled knowledge from ChatGPT outputs). Users have found DeepSeek competent in open-ended generation, and its V3 model was evaluated on open-ended tasks showing strong results. Gemini benefits from Google’s experience with models like LaMDA and PaLM; Gemini 2.5 produces high-quality, human-preference-optimized responses (as evidenced by its LMArena human eval win). It also has strengths in generating structured and visual descriptions. For instance, Gemini can brainstorm, write and even help with planning tasks in a creative manner (advertised as an assistant for writing, brainstorming, etc.). Overall, all three are capable of creative output; ChatGPT is widely used for its creative fluency, while Gemini and DeepSeek are rapidly catching up, with Gemini’s human-tuned style and DeepSeek’s cost-effective generation making them viable for creative use cases.
Factual Accuracy and Knowledge: All models draw on vast training data, but their approaches to factuality differ. ChatGPT (GPT-4) has a broad knowledge base (up to 2021 data, plus limited updates via plugins) and improved factual accuracy over earlier models, though it can still produce hallucinations on obscure queries. OpenAI has continuously fine-tuned GPT-4 for correctness and even added a beta “browse” feature so it can fetch current info. DeepSeek-V3/R1 were trained on an enormous corpus (over 14 trillion tokens) including up-to-2024 data, which may give it more up-to-date knowledge out-of-the-box. Reports note DeepSeek’s models provide strong answers to technical questions and often match ChatGPT in accuracy. DeepSeek also integrated a web search feature in its app, ensuring up-to-date information retrieval. One caveat: the official DeepSeek app abides by Chinese censorship rules (omitting certain facts), though the open model weights can be run uncensored. Gemini 2.5 has the advantage of real-time integration with Google’s knowledge graph and search. In Google’s Search Generative Experience, Gemini can perform “Deep Search” to fact-check queries. Its training likely included Google’s high-quality datasets, and it demonstrated strong performance on knowledge-intensive benchmarks (e.g. ~89% on MMLU, slightly above GPT-4). Moreover, Gemini’s ability to reason through context means it can handle complex factual questions (it scored state-of-the-art 18.8% on the extremely hard “Humanity’s Last Exam” challenge, surpassing other models). In practice, all three strive for factual accuracy, with Gemini leveraging Google’s live data and DeepSeek offering competitive accuracy at low cost. ChatGPT remains very reliable for in-domain knowledge but may require plugin assistance for current events.
Coding and Technical Skills: This has become a key strength of all three platforms. ChatGPT (especially GPT-4) is an excellent coding assistant – it can generate code, debug, and explain algorithms in multiple languages. It was benchmarked at ~80% on HumanEval (Python coding challenges), a massive leap over previous models. Developers widely use ChatGPT for code completion and code review tasks. DeepSeek-V3 has been explicitly tuned for coding as well; its mixture-of-experts architecture and RL fine-tuning helped it achieve HumanEval pass@1 around 82–83% (even slightly above GPT-4 in some tests). In a coding competition setting (Codeforces), DeepSeek-V3 far outperformed GPT-4 (solving significantly harder problems). DeepSeek’s open model means users can even have it run locally for private code (albeit requiring powerful hardware). Gemini 2.5 Pro has placed huge emphasis on coding capabilities. Google reports 2.5 Pro “excels at creating web apps and code generation” and made a “big leap over 2.0” in coding performance. On internal coding benchmarks (like Google’s SWE-Verified and Aider code-editing tests), Gemini 2.5 scored among the top – for example, it leads on coding tasks involving multiple languages and complex editing. Google has integrated Gemini into developer tools: e.g. Android Studio’s AI assistant now uses Gemini for code suggestions. In summary, all three are state-of-the-art coding assistants. ChatGPT set the standard for general coding help; Gemini and DeepSeek have matched or surpassed it on many coding benchmarks, with Gemini offering deeper integration into dev workflows and DeepSeek offering cost efficiency for coding tasks.
Multimodal Abilities: Here the approaches diverge significantly. ChatGPT (GPT-4) has partial multimodal support: GPT-4 was designed with image understanding capability – it can analyze and describe images – but this feature was only selectively available (e.g. via a limited beta) and not broadly released at first. By 2025, OpenAI enabled some multimodal features: ChatGPT can accept image inputs for analysis (e.g. describing an image or diagram) in certain clients, and it supports voice input/output through the ChatGPT mobile app (speech-to-text via Whisper and text-to-speech for responses). It can also generate images via plugins or integration with DALL·E: OpenAI allowed ChatGPT (Plus) to use an image generation tool, enabling prompts like “create an image of…” to yield AI-generated images. These capabilities mean ChatGPT provides a versatile multimodal interface: users can talk to it, show it pictures to analyze, and ask it to produce images or graphics (with external model help). DeepSeek, by contrast, is currently limited to text. It is a pure text-based chatbot (no native image or audio input/output). The DeepSeek app focuses on text chat for now (though it can read files and handle long text input). Its research focus was more on efficient text and reasoning, not vision or audio, so multimodal tasks are not its domain as of 2025. Gemini, being built by Google, was “multimodal from the ground up.” Gemini models can accept text + image inputs and perform visual tasks like captioning or analysis. For example, on Vertex AI one can attach images in a prompt to Gemini and get a descriptive or analytical text response. Google has also announced a Gemini Pro Vision model for image understanding. On the output side, Gemini doesn’t directly generate images from the text model; instead, Google leverages specialized models: e.g. the Imagen 4 model for image generation is offered alongside Gemini, and the new Veo models for video generation are part of the Gemini ecosystem. In Google’s consumer offering (the Gemini app via Google One), subscribers can use Flow and Whisk tools to create videos (via Veo) and image-to-video, indicating tight integration of multimodal generative AI in the platform. Gemini can also output speech: text-to-speech capabilities are available (Gemini had preview models that generate spoken responses). In summary, ChatGPT and Gemini are both multimodal assistants, but with different implementations: ChatGPT uses a combination of GPT-4 plus allied models (vision and speech modules), whereas Gemini is part of a broader Google AI suite (with dedicated image/video generators and built-in image understanding). DeepSeek currently focuses only on text, ceding multimodal use cases to the other two.
Table 1: Key Capabilities and Performance
Use Cases and Applications
Each platform has found a niche across various domains. Below we compare their common use cases – customer support, education, research, and business productivity – and how well-suited each AI is:
Customer Support: All three can be deployed as virtual assistants for customer service, but with different approaches. ChatGPT (via OpenAI’s API) is widely used to build customer support bots and FAQ assistants. Its strength in understanding human queries and providing fluent answers is a big draw. Companies have integrated GPT-4 into support workflows (for example, via Microsoft’s Azure OpenAI service) to automate customer chat and email responses. DeepSeek is emerging in this area due to its cost advantages: developers can self-host DeepSeek-R1 or use its API at a fraction of OpenAI’s cost. This makes it attractive for startups or organizations with large volumes of queries. Moreover, since DeepSeek’s model weights are open, businesses can fine-tune it on their own support data and even run it on-premises for privacy. However, one consideration is content moderation – the official DeepSeek API applies Chinese content filters (which might block certain queries or opinions). Companies using it internationally might choose the open model without those restrictions. Gemini is provided through Google’s Cloud and Workspace, making it a natural fit for enterprises already in the Google ecosystem. For instance, Google’s Contact Center AI now leverages Gemini for conversational support agents. Gemini’s integration with live search is a plus for customer support: it can fetch real-time knowledge base info. Additionally, Google offers Duet AI in Gmail for customer support agents (suggesting email replies), and Gemini in Chrome which can summarize support tickets or web inquiries. In summary, ChatGPT currently has the most third-party adoption in customer support, but DeepSeek is a compelling low-cost alternative, and Google’s Gemini is positioned for enterprise support solutions (especially where integration with Google’s data and services is beneficial).
Education and Tutoring: ChatGPT has been widely adopted (informally) as a tutoring tool – students use it for help with homework explanations, language practice, and generating study materials. Its ability to adapt style means it can act as a patient teacher or a debate opponent. Some educational platforms (e.g. Khan Academy’s Khanmigo) use GPT-4 to power tutoring bots. One challenge is ensuring accuracy and encouraging students to think (not just giving answers), which educators address by using ChatGPT to explain solutions. DeepSeek can similarly serve as a tutor. Its free availability on mobile (with no query limits) has led to quick adoption by students globally. It can handle complex questions (especially STEM, given its strong math reasoning) and support both English and Chinese educational content (DeepSeek is bilingual). Because it’s open-source, some educators and researchers have even customized DeepSeek models for specific curricula or to be safer for classroom use. However, DeepSeek’s tendency to reflect certain biases or censorship (in the official version) is a consideration – e.g. it might refuse certain historical or political questions – although a self-hosted instance can remove those limits. Gemini is deeply integrated into educational and research tools by Google. For example, NotebookLM (a Google Labs product) uses Gemini to help students and researchers digest readings – it can summarize documents, answer questions about a set of notes, and even create flashcards. In the Google One plans, users get enhanced NotebookLM with audio overviews and more notebooks, indicating a focus on learning. Google Classroom and other educational platforms are expected to incorporate Gemini to assist teachers in generating lesson plans and students in personalized learning (though careful guardrails are needed to prevent cheating). Overall, ChatGPT and Gemini are more polished for education (with better moderation and training in explanatory style), while DeepSeek offers raw power and low cost, which some resource-constrained schools or independent learners might leverage.
Research and Knowledge Work: In research settings (academic or industry R&D), these AI models serve as assistants for literature review, data analysis, and ideation. ChatGPT/GPT-4 can summarize academic papers, suggest hypotheses, and even help write code for data analysis. Its strong language understanding helps in extracting insights from papers or generating coherent research drafts. Many researchers use GPT-4 via plugins to search academic databases or to analyze data (the Code Interpreter feature, now called Advanced Data Analysis, lets ChatGPT run Python code for data science tasks within a sandbox). DeepSeek is appealing to researchers in AI and NLP because it’s open: they can inspect its outputs, fine-tune it on scientific text, or use it to experiment with new techniques. Its 128K token context window is a boon for literature review – DeepSeek can ingest extremely long documents or even multiple papers at once and answer questions comparing them. This far exceeds the typical context of ChatGPT (unless using specialized API versions). Additionally, AI safety researchers have analyzed DeepSeek’s model to understand its behavior, since having the weights allows transparency (e.g. investigating claims of it distilling outputs from ChatGPT). Gemini targets knowledge workers through integration with familiar tools: it’s embedded in Google Docs and Sheets (via Duet AI) to help summarize data or brainstorm within documents. Google’s Mariner project (available in the Ultra plan) is an “agentic research prototype” – essentially an AI agent powered by Gemini that can automate research tasks (perhaps searching for information, compiling reports, etc.). This indicates Gemini is geared toward enterprise research assistants that can take on multi-step research tasks autonomously. Also, Google’s AI search (SGE) with Gemini helps researchers quickly find and synthesize information from the web. In summary, all three are valuable for research: ChatGPT for its reliable language and coding help, DeepSeek for its openness and huge context (enabling deep document analysis), and Gemini for its integration with data, search, and automated agents in a professional workflow.
Business Productivity: For general business productivity – writing emails, generating reports, analyzing spreadsheets, creating presentations – ChatGPT and Gemini are directly competing, while DeepSeek plays a more niche role. ChatGPT gained a massive user base among professionals for drafting emails, outlining documents, and brainstorming business ideas. With the introduction of ChatGPT Enterprise, companies can enable GPT-4 for employees with privacy assurances and higher performance (longer context windows, faster responses). Microsoft’s productivity suite also integrates OpenAI’s models through Copilot (e.g. in Word, Outlook, Excel), bringing ChatGPT-like assistance into everyday business software. DeepSeek is not integrated into such tools, but a tech-savvy team could use DeepSeek’s API to build internal productivity bots (for instance, a Slack bot that uses DeepSeek to answer policy questions or summarize meeting notes). The zero-cost usage makes it attractive for small businesses or open-source office assistants, though it lacks out-of-the-box connections to Office or Google Workspace. Google Gemini is arguably designed for business productivity. Through Duet AI in Workspace, Gemini helps compose emails in Gmail, generate summaries and action items from meeting transcripts in Google Meet, create content in Google Docs and Slides, and formula insights in Sheets. All these are directly embedded for Google’s paying customers. Additionally, Gemini’s “Gemini in Chrome” acts as a personal web browsing assistant (e.g. summarizing pages, comparable to Bing Chat). Google’s strategy is to offer Gemini’s capabilities as a value-add for Google One and Workspace subscribers, effectively targeting business users and professionals who need productivity boosts. So while ChatGPT remains a popular general tool for productivity (often used ad-hoc by individuals), Google is leveraging Gemini to be an always-on corporate productivity assistant. DeepSeek, while not a turnkey productivity solution, demonstrates the potential of an open model to be customized for business needs without vendor lock-in.
Pricing and Availability
The platforms differ markedly in their pricing models and access options, ranging from DeepSeek’s free model to premium enterprise plans:
ChatGPT: OpenAI offers both free and paid tiers. The Free tier gives access to ChatGPT with the GPT-3.5 model (sufficient for casual use but limited in complex tasks and slower during peak times). The ChatGPT Plus subscription costs $20/month and provides priority access to GPT-4, faster response, and early access to new features (like plugins, vision, etc.). OpenAI also introduced ChatGPT Enterprise for organizations – it offers unlimited GPT-4 access at higher speeds, 32K context, advanced data encryption, and admin tools; pricing is not public (it’s custom, likely per-seat or usage-based for large clients). Additionally, developers can use the OpenAI API, which is pay-as-you-go: e.g. GPT-4 (8k) is billed at
$0.03 per 1K input tokens and $0.06 per 1K output tokens (about $60 per million tokens output). GPT-3.5 Turbo is much cheaper ($0.002 per 1K tokens). There is no self-hosting option – all usage goes through OpenAI’s cloud.DeepSeek: Remarkably, DeepSeek’s chatbot is completely free to use for end-users. There are no query limits and no paid premium version as of 2025. This free strategy (subsidized by the startup) led to DeepSeek-R1 becoming the most-downloaded free app on the iOS App Store in early 2025. For developers and businesses, DeepSeek provides an API that is extremely low-cost: only $0.55 per million input tokens and $2.19 per million output tokens. This is 10–30× cheaper than OpenAI’s GPT-4 API on a per-token basis. Such aggressive pricing undercuts rivals and has been a major selling point (DeepSeek has been described as “20 to 50 times cheaper to use than OpenAI’s model” by Reuters). Moreover, because the model weights are open-source, anyone can download DeepSeek-V3 or R1 and run them locally or on their own servers for free (apart from computing costs). The open license (MIT) even allows commercial reuse. This means industries can fine-tune or embed DeepSeek in their products without paying DeepSeek, which is unique among top-tier models. In summary, DeepSeek is the most cost-accessible: free app for users, cheap API for cloud use, and free self-hosting for those with hardware.
Google Gemini: Google’s approach is tied to its product offerings. There is no standalone “Gemini subscription,” but rather Gemini is included in Google’s premium plans. Notably, Google One (consumer cloud subscription) introduced Google AI Pro and Google AI Ultra plans. Google AI Pro (approx. $25/month, includes 2 TB storage) gives access to the Gemini app with the Gemini 2.5 Pro model, as well as limited access to Gemini’s video generation (Veo 3 Fast). Google AI Ultra (around $50–$60/month, includes 30 TB storage) grants the highest limits and exclusive access to “2.5 Deep Think,” which is described as the most advanced reasoning model, presumably an even more powerful or unrestricted version of Gemini Pro. Ultra users also get full access to the latest Veo 3 video generation and other perks like Project Mariner and YouTube Premium. For enterprise and business users, Google offers Duet AI in Workspace (which, as of 2024, was priced at $30/user for businesses). By 2025, Workspace plans for enterprises likely bundle Gemini-based features; Google is positioning it as an add-on for Google Workspace and Cloud customers. Developers can access Gemini via the Vertex AI API on Google Cloud. The API pricing is usage-based (similar to other cloud AI services). While exact public prices for Gemini 2.5 aren’t listed, one can expect it to be in the same order as OpenAI or slightly lower, with Google possibly offering volume discounts to attract developers. Google did release smaller Gemma open models (for fine-tuning) and Gemini Nano for free on-device use, but the flagship models are closed-source and behind Google’s paywalls. It’s worth noting that Google still maintains a free Bard service for general users, but as of mid-2025 Bard runs on a PaLM 2 model (or a limited Gemini model) for non-subscribers. The full power of Gemini (2.5 Pro and beyond) is reserved for paying users (Pixel device owners, Google One subscribers, etc., in supported regions).
Table 2: Pricing and Access Tiers
Technical Details and Architecture
Under the hood, each platform has a distinct technical philosophy:
Model Architecture: ChatGPT’s models (GPT-3.5, GPT-4) are large Transformer-based neural networks, presumably dense (fully-activated) models. OpenAI has not disclosed GPT-4’s size, but estimates range in the hundreds of billions to a trillion+ parameters. It uses a standard decoder-only transformer architecture with extensive training on diverse data, followed by fine-tuning. DeepSeek’s models use a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) Transformer architecture. In MoE, only a subset of model parameters (“experts”) are active per token, which greatly reduces computation per inference. DeepSeek-V3 has 671B total parameters but only 37B participate for any given input token. This design, along with Multi-Head Latent Attention and other innovations, makes DeepSeek more efficient to train and run. DeepSeek’s team also used cutting-edge techniques like FP8 precision training and optimized parallelism to cut costs (they fully trained V3 for under $6 million using NVIDIA H800 chips). R1 is presumably a dense or semi-dense model specialized for chain-of-thought generation; it acted as a “teacher” that guided V3’s reasoning ability via knowledge distillation. Google’s Gemini is also based on the Transformer, but with DeepMind’s enhancements. Gemini 2.5 introduced “adaptive thinking,” effectively an internal mechanism to perform multi-step reasoning (e.g. generating and evaluating intermediate thoughts) before final answers. This may involve techniques like tree-of-thought or self-reflection under the hood. DeepMind has experience with reinforcement learning (AlphaGo line) and they applied some to Gemini – although specifics are sparse, Gemini likely uses RLHF and perhaps game-play style optimization for certain tasks. There’s no public info on whether Gemini uses MoE or dense layers; given the trend, it might be a dense model but highly optimized on Google’s TPU v5 hardware. It’s also multimodal at the architecture level, meaning parts of the model can process images or other modalities (or it’s tightly coupled with dedicated vision models). Notably, Gemini models scale from huge cloud models down to Gemini Nano for mobile, indicating a spectrum of sizes (Nano might be a quantized smaller model for on-device tasks).
Training Data: All three leverage massive datasets. ChatGPT/GPT-4 was trained on text from websites, books, academic articles, code from public repositories (GitHub), and more, amounting to trillions of tokens. OpenAI also fine-tuned it on conversations (to make it follow instructions and behave politely) using their custom datasets. DeepSeek likewise used a diverse corpus of 14.8T tokens including multilingual web data (likely both English and Chinese content). DeepSeek’s standout is that it incorporated outputs from other models as training data – OpenAI pointed out that DeepSeek may have trained via distillation of ChatGPT’s answers. This means DeepSeek might have used questions answered by ChatGPT (or similar) to train R1, thereby learning from GPT-4’s knowledge indirectly. This controversial practice could explain why DeepSeek achieved high performance with relatively low compute. As a result, DeepSeek’s knowledge base is broad and up-to-date to late 2024, including technical and common sense knowledge. Google’s Gemini was trained on Google’s vast data resources: this includes the public web (likely filtered for quality), Google’s own content (like Google Books, Wikipedia, YouTube transcripts), code from GitHub, and probably proprietary datasets (e.g. instruction dialogues). It’s explicitly built to be multilingual and multimodal – for instance, Gemini can understand images, which suggests training on image-text pairs (possibly Google’s Image Captioning data, COCO, WebImages, etc.). By 2025, Gemini would also ingest user interactions from Bard (to improve its conversational fine-tuning). All models undergo fine-tuning on instructions and RLHF: OpenAI pioneered RLHF, DeepSeek also did Supervised Fine-Tuning and RL on V3, and Google likely did a form of RLHF with human raters for Gemini (given its high LMArena scores reflecting human preference).
Benchmark Performance: We’ve touched on many benchmarks; to summarize key points: On MMLU (massive multi-task knowledge test), all three are in the mid-to-high 80s (% accuracy). GPT-4 ~86-87%, DeepSeek-V3 ~87%, Gemini 2.5 ~88-89%. This indicates comparable general knowledge and reasoning across 57 subjects. On coding benchmarks like HumanEval (Python coding), GPT-4 was ~80%, DeepSeek-V3 ~81%, Gemini 2.5 ~83% (all excellent, essentially top-tier). On math word problems (GSM8K, MATH), Gemini 2.5 and DeepSeek-V3 have an edge – e.g. Gemini got 90% on a MATH dataset vs GPT-4’s mid-70s. One unique benchmark, “Humanity’s Last Exam”, where GPT-4 previously scored ~15%, saw Gemini 2.5 reach 18.8% (new SOTA), indicating it pushes the frontier on expert-level questions. DeepSeek’s R1/V3 have not been publicly reported on HLE, but their strong showing on Chinese exams (CMMLU ~88%) and competitive edge in math suggests they’d fare well. It’s important to note benchmarks are quickly evolving – by late 2025, new tests for multi-step reasoning and multimodal understanding are being introduced, and these models will continue to chase state-of-the-art on those.
Latency and Inference Speed: In interactive use, ChatGPT (GPT-4) is sometimes noted to be slower, especially compared to GPT-3.5. OpenAI likely runs GPT-4 on powerful GPUs but its complexity means responses can have noticeable delay (several seconds for long answers). They have optimized it over time and possibly introduced a faster inference variant internally (sometimes referred to as GPT-4 Turbo or GPT-4.5 by observers). DeepSeek’s MoE approach can yield speed advantages: since not all parameters are used for each token, it can generate faster per token for the same hardware. DeepSeek reported a 5.76× throughput boost in V2 over a dense model of similar quality. Users running DeepSeek locally note that using GPU multi-processing (and optimized libraries like vLLM) achieves respectable speeds, though the model is still large. The perplexity is that DeepSeek’s own service is quite responsive despite being free – likely due to efficient inference and possibly a smaller distilled model serving the app (there were hints that on mobile/PC it might run a lighter version). Gemini is designed for scalability on Google’s TPU infrastructure. The Flash and Flash-Lite versions are explicitly “low-latency, high-performance” models. This suggests Google runs distilled or optimized versions of Gemini for quick conversational responses (for example, in Search where answers need to be near-instant). Meanwhile, the full Gemini 2.5 Pro might be used when a user requests a “Deep Thought” or larger task (trading speed for accuracy). Google’s advantage is vertical integration: they optimized the model code, the runtime (JAX/TPU), and even the browser interface for speed. In practical terms, by Aug 2025 users have found that Gemini in Bard/Search often returns answers faster than ChatGPT’s website does for GPT-4. ChatGPT-Plus can be snappy for short answers but slows for long outputs; Gemini’s Flash mode might maintain steady speed for reasonably long outputs. DeepSeek’s public app sometimes had to throttle or queue requests (especially after its viral success), but when operating normally it delivers answers in a similar timeframe to ChatGPT, thanks to its efficiency.
Context Window: Context length is a technical feature that determines how much input text the model can consider. ChatGPT/GPT-4 offers 8K tokens to Plus users by default, and up to 32K tokens via the API (or to some Enterprise users). 32K tokens (~24,000 words) is enough for analyzing medium-length documents or lengthy conversations. DeepSeek-V3 hugely surpasses this with a 128K token context. This is one of the longest contexts in any AI model of its caliber. Practically, 128K tokens (~96,000 words) means DeepSeek can intake an entire book or multiple documents at once for analysis. They demonstrated strong performance even at these long contexts. This capability is a boon for data analysis and lengthy transcripts. Gemini’s context wasn’t explicitly stated, but Google has hinted at massive context as well. One source mentioned Gemini 2.0 Flash supports up to 1 million tokens and hundreds of images in a prompt – if accurate, that is orders of magnitude beyond others. It’s possible that in practice, Google limits the context for public use (for latency/cost reasons) but can handle very large inputs for enterprise tasks. Even if not millions, we can infer Gemini’s context is at least on the order of GPT-4’s or more; Google likely ensured it can handle large documents to power features like summarizing whole websites or datasets in Workspace. This trend towards huge context windows is part of enabling these models to act as extended memory or retrieval-based agents.
API and Integration: All three have APIs but with different ecosystems. OpenAI’s API is relatively straightforward REST endpoints for completions, chat, etc., and a broad ecosystem of wrappers and libraries (plus Microsoft’s Azure API). Many apps integrate ChatGPT via this API. DeepSeek’s API is available (with simple REST calls as well), though as a newer entrant its ecosystem is smaller. However, because the model is open, integration can also mean directly embedding the model using libraries like Hugging Face Transformers or running it in a local server – this gives developers a lot of flexibility (and no need to call an external API at all if they host it). Gemini’s API is part of Google Cloud’s Vertex AI. Developers use it through the Vertex AI SDK, and it offers not just raw model access but also tools for chaining prompts, evaluating safety, etc. Google provides deep integration options: for instance, there are extensions to Android (so apps can run prompts with Gemini Nano on-device or fallback to cloud Gemini), and connectors to Google’s data services. This makes Gemini attractive for enterprises already using GCP or Google’s productivity suite – the barrier to integrate AI into their existing workflows is low. On the other hand, independent developers might find OpenAI’s API more accessible if they don’t need the full Google stack.
Audience and Target Users
Finally, the positioning and target audience of each platform:
ChatGPT: Initially targeted to everyone – from casual users chatting for fun to professionals and developers. Its ease of use (just a chat webpage or app) brought in over 100 million users in 2023, making AI assistance mainstream. Over time, OpenAI has bifurcated its offerings: individual users (students, writers, hobbyists) use the ChatGPT app/website (free or Plus), while business users are courted with the Enterprise offering and through Microsoft’s integrated products (Office 365 Copilot, Bing Chat for business, etc.). Industries adopting ChatGPT range widely: media and marketing (content generation), e-commerce (writing product descriptions, customer interaction), legal (first drafts of documents), and software (coding assistance). OpenAI’s strategy with ChatGPT is broad, aiming to be a general-purpose “assistant for all.” They rely on developers to build niche solutions with the API for specific industries. Geographically, ChatGPT (being English-centric initially) dominated in the US and Europe; it faced competition or restrictions in regions like China (where users had to use VPNs or alternatives like DeepSeek).
DeepSeek: The rise of DeepSeek has a strong regional and strategic dimension. It is often called “China’s ChatGPT”, and the Chinese government and tech community have rallied around it. DeepSeek’s immediate audience was Chinese users (with full support for Chinese language and alignment with local policies), but interestingly it also became popular in the US as a free alternative, as evidenced by it topping the US App Store. So DeepSeek’s user base includes general consumers globally, especially those who value a free service. The company’s open-source approach also targets developers, researchers, and startups worldwide who are interested in an alternative to closed AI models. The fact that Amazon, Toyota, and Stripe have shown interest in using DeepSeek’s model indicates that even Western businesses are evaluating it, likely for private deployments to reduce costs. That said, some enterprises might be cautious due to its origin and potential geopolitical/data concerns. Within China, DeepSeek is positioned as a national champion; government offices and industries (from healthcare to legal) have experimented with it for drafting documents and analyses. In summary, DeepSeek’s audience spans tech-savvy users and budget-conscious developers globally, as well as Chinese businesses and government agencies that are encouraged to adopt home-grown AI. Industries that require transparency (like researchers who want to inspect or fine-tune the model) also favor DeepSeek for its open nature.
Gemini (Google): Google is aiming Gemini at professional and enterprise users, as well as maintaining a foothold in the consumer assistant market. With Gemini integrated into Workspace, the clear target is knowledge workers – people whose daily jobs involve emails, documents, meetings, and data analysis. For those users, Gemini (via Duet AI) becomes a real-time collaborator. Google’s bundling of Gemini in paid plans also suggests they target prosumers – individuals like content creators, small business owners, or enthusiasts willing to pay for advanced AI plus storage and other perks. Meanwhile, by enhancing Search with Gemini, Google targets everyday internet users so they don’t leave Google for AI answers – this is defensive to keep their search audience engaged with Google’s own AI. In the developer community, Google wants developers and startups on its cloud to use Gemini for building new applications (competing with OpenAI’s API). Sectors like healthcare, finance, and customer service that already use Google Cloud are being pitched Gemini as part of vertically specialized solutions (Google has domain-tuned models or will fine-tune for those industries, leveraging its cloud customer relationships). Another audience is Android users – features like Gemini in Android (for AI assistance on the phone) and the inclusion of Gemini in Pixel devices (to power Magic Compose, Voice typing, etc.) mean that mobile users are an important user base. Essentially, Google is leveraging its ecosystem: if you use Google’s products, Gemini is the AI that will serve you across those products. This contrasts with ChatGPT’s more platform-agnostic approach and DeepSeek’s open platform; Google’s is ecosystem-centric. One could say Gemini’s focus is productivity and creativity for users already in Google’s orbit (businesses, educators, creators on YouTube/Android) – for example, the video generation tools aim at YouTubers or marketers.
In conclusion, ChatGPT, DeepSeek, and Gemini each bring cutting-edge AI capabilities but with different philosophies: ChatGPT offers a polished, general AI assistant with a straightforward subscription model; DeepSeek provides an open, ultra-affordable model that has upended the notion that only big players dominate (earning descriptions of a “Sputnik moment” in AI); and Gemini represents the fusion of DeepMind’s research with Google’s infrastructure, targeting seamless integration into everyday tools and pushing multi-modal frontiers. The competition among these as of August 2025 has greatly benefited users and organizations, who now have multiple options – from free open-source models to premium integrated AI suites – to choose from for their reasoning, creativity, and productivity needs.
____________
FOLLOW US FOR MORE.
DATA STUDIOS