Gemini 3 vs ChatGPT 5.2: File Upload Limits and Supported Formats Compared

File upload capability is one of the most underestimated constraints in professional AI workflows, because it determines not only what can be analyzed, but also how work must be structured, how often context must be rebuilt, and where hidden bottlenecks emerge in real usage.

The comparison between Gemini 3 and ChatGPT 5.2 reveals two very different philosophies in how file ingestion, format handling, and scale limits are designed and exposed to users.

·····

File upload limits define workflow architecture, not just convenience.

In professional environments, file upload limits shape workflows long before any reasoning happens.

They influence whether documents must be split, whether preprocessing is required, and whether analysis can happen in a single coherent session or must be fragmented across multiple interactions.

What matters most is not a single headline number, but the combination of size limits, format handling, token ceilings, and attachment structure.

........

Core dimensions of file upload constraints

Dimension	Why it matters
Maximum file size	Determines whether large artifacts fit at all
Token or page limits	Affects long documents more than file size
Files per prompt	Shapes multi-document workflows
Supported formats	Determines preprocessing effort
Persistence scope	Impacts multi-session analysis

·····

ChatGPT 5.2 prioritizes large single-file ingestion with token-based limits.

ChatGPT 5.2 is designed around the ability to ingest very large individual files, with per-file size limits that allow substantial artifacts to be uploaded in one step.

For text-heavy documents, however, the practical ceiling is often not megabytes but token count, which caps how much textual content can be actively processed from a single file.

This makes ChatGPT particularly strong for deep analysis of large PDFs, reports, or datasets that are logically cohesive and best handled as a single artifact.

........

ChatGPT 5.2 file handling characteristics

Aspect	Observed behavior	Practical implication
Max file size	Very high	Suitable for large PDFs
Token ceiling	Dominant constraint for text	Long documents may truncate
Files per workspace	Limited by project structure	Encourages consolidation
Spreadsheet handling	Explicit size sensitivity	Requires clean data
Best fit	Deep single-document analysis	Reports, contracts, research

·····

Gemini 3 emphasizes multi-file attachment and prompt-level structure.

Gemini 3 approaches file uploads from a different angle, focusing on multiple attachments per prompt rather than extremely large single files.

This design favors workflows where context is spread across several related documents, such as slide decks, notes, reference PDFs, and supporting materials used together.

Instead of relying on a single massive upload, Gemini encourages structured prompts with multiple smaller files attached simultaneously.

........

Gemini 3 file handling characteristics

Aspect	Observed behavior	Practical implication
Max file size	Moderate per file	Encourages segmentation
Files per prompt	Multiple allowed	Strong multi-artifact context
Media support	Broad	Suited for mixed inputs
Token handling	Less visible to users	Fewer surprises
Best fit	Comparative and contextual analysis	Multi-source workflows

·····

Supported formats overlap, but processing behavior differs.

Both systems support a wide range of common professional formats, including PDFs, text documents, spreadsheets, and images.

The difference lies not in whether a format is accepted, but in how predictably it is processed and where limits surface.

ChatGPT tends to surface limits as token exhaustion or partial ingestion in very long documents.

Gemini tends to surface limits as attachment count or per-file size boundaries.

........

Format handling comparison

Format type	ChatGPT 5.2 behavior	Gemini 3 behavior
PDFs	Strong for large single files	Better when split
Text documents	Token-limited	Context-limited
Spreadsheets	Size-sensitive	Structure-sensitive
Images	Supported with size caps	Strong multimodal handling
Mixed bundles	Less flexible	Strong prompt-level support

·····

Document-heavy workflows expose different bottlenecks.

For workflows centered on contracts, research papers, or long reports, ChatGPT’s token ceiling becomes the critical planning constraint.

Even when a file uploads successfully, only part of the content may be actively usable unless the document is segmented.

For workflows centered on comparison, synthesis, or contextual reasoning across sources, Gemini’s multi-file prompt model reduces friction and keeps context explicit.

........

Workflow bottleneck patterns

Workflow type	Primary bottleneck
Long legal documents	Token limits (ChatGPT)
Research synthesis	Attachment structure (Gemini)
Spreadsheet analysis	Parsing complexity
Multimedia analysis	Media-specific caps

·····

Persistence and reusability differ across ecosystems.

ChatGPT’s project-based structure encourages reusing uploaded files across sessions, supporting long-running analysis where documents remain available.

Gemini’s prompt-centric model emphasizes fresh context assembly, reducing hidden carryover but increasing setup repetition.

This affects how teams plan ongoing work versus ad hoc analysis.

........

Persistence behavior

Model	Persistence style	Operational effect
ChatGPT 5.2	Project-level reuse	Long-term analysis
Gemini 3	Prompt-level context	Clean session boundaries

·····

File limits translate directly into cost and time.

When files must be split, summarized, or re-uploaded repeatedly, hidden costs appear in both time and cognitive overhead.

ChatGPT minimizes splitting for large single artifacts but demands awareness of token ceilings.

Gemini minimizes prompt fragmentation for multi-source inputs but requires file size discipline.

Professional efficiency depends on aligning these limits with the dominant document structure of the workflow.

........

Efficiency trade-offs

Constraint type	Cost impact
Token truncation	Rework and missed context
Attachment limits	Prompt restructuring
Format preprocessing	Manual overhead
Session resets	Context rebuilding

·····

File upload design reflects underlying product philosophy.

ChatGPT 5.2 treats file upload as deep ingestion of a primary artifact, optimized for intensive analysis of a core document.

Gemini 3 treats file upload as context assembly, optimized for reasoning across multiple supporting materials.

Neither approach is universally superior.

The correct choice depends on whether the workflow revolves around one large source of truth or many coordinated inputs.

·····

·····

FOLLOW US FOR MORE

·····

·····

DATA STUDIOS

·····

·····

[datastudios.org]