How Cost of Goods Sold Shapes Profitability in the Income Statement

Cost of goods sold (COGS) is one of the most important expense categories in the income statement because it directly determines a company’s gross profit. It represents the costs incurred to produce or purchase the goods that were sold during the reporting period. The accurate measurement and reporting of COGS ensure that profitability is not overstated and that financial statements provide a faithful representation of business performance. Both US GAAP and IFRS contain detailed guidance on how inventory and production costs are recognized, how cost flows are applied, and how disclosures should be presented.

Cost of goods sold is defined as the direct cost of items sold.

COGS includes all costs directly attributable to the production or purchase of goods sold within the reporting period. This typically encompasses:

• Raw materials used.

• Direct labor involved in production.

• Manufacturing overhead allocated to finished goods.

• Freight-in and related acquisition costs.

Administrative expenses, selling costs, and distribution expenses are excluded, as they are not directly linked to production. This distinction ensures that COGS reflects only the costs of goods actually transferred to customers.

The link between COGS and gross profit explains profitability.

Revenue is the top line of the income statement, while COGS is subtracted directly beneath it to arrive at gross profit. Gross profit is a crucial metric because it measures the efficiency with which a company turns inputs into outputs.

For example:

Item	Amount (USD)
Revenue	500,000
Cost of Goods Sold	320,000
Gross Profit	180,000

In this case, the gross profit margin is 36 percent. A rising COGS without a corresponding increase in sales may compress margins, signaling higher input costs, inefficiencies, or pricing pressure.

Cost flow assumptions affect the measurement of COGS.

Both IFRS and US GAAP permit different cost flow assumptions for inventory valuation, which directly influence COGS:

• FIFO (First-In, First-Out): Assumes oldest inventory costs are expensed first.

• Weighted Average: Uses an average cost per unit for all items available.

• Specific Identification: Tracks the actual cost of each item sold.

• LIFO (Last-In, First-Out): Allowed only under US GAAP, assumes newest costs are expensed first.

The choice among these methods impacts profitability and taxes. In periods of rising prices, FIFO results in lower COGS and higher gross profit, while LIFO produces higher COGS and lower profit. IFRS prohibits LIFO because it may distort the true flow of inventory.

Journal entries clarify how COGS is recorded.

When goods are sold, revenue is recognized and inventory is reduced. The recording involves two simultaneous entries:

1. To recognize the sale:

   • Debit: Accounts Receivable 20,000

   • Credit: Revenue 20,000

2. To record the cost of goods sold:

   • Debit: Cost of Goods Sold 12,000

   • Credit: Inventory 12,000

This dual entry system ensures that both the inflow of revenue and the outflow of costs are reported in the same period, complying with the matching principle.

Standards ensure consistency and transparency.

Under IAS 2: Inventories (IFRS) and ASC 330: Inventory (US GAAP), entities must measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The carrying amount of inventory directly influences COGS because the expense is recognized when inventory is sold.

Both frameworks also require disclosure of the cost formulas used (FIFO, weighted average, etc.), the amount of inventory recognized as expense, and any write-downs to net realizable value. This disclosure enhances comparability between companies and across reporting periods.

The analysis of COGS reveals operational efficiency.

Investors and analysts examine COGS trends to assess cost management and supply chain efficiency. A rising COGS relative to revenue may indicate increased raw material prices, higher labor costs, or inefficiencies in production. Conversely, stable or declining COGS can reflect improved procurement strategies, economies of scale, or productivity gains.

For instance, if a company’s COGS ratio to revenue increases from 60 percent to 70 percent over three years, gross profit margins decline significantly, potentially eroding overall profitability unless offset by higher sales prices or lower operating costs.

Disclosures support a deeper understanding of cost structures.

Companies are expected to disclose the components of COGS and the policies applied in determining inventory costs. In industries such as manufacturing, where overhead allocations are significant, these disclosures help users of financial statements evaluate whether the company’s cost accounting provides a realistic measure of product costs.

Clear reporting of COGS ensures that investors, creditors, and other stakeholders can make informed judgments about profitability, efficiency, and competitive position in the marketplace.

____________

FOLLOW US FOR MORE.

DATA STUDIOS

datastudios.org