How to derecognize financial assets and liabilities under IFRS and US GAAP

The derecognition of financial assets and liabilities is a critical accounting step that determines when a company should remove an item from its balance sheet. Although both IFRS and US GAAP follow conceptually similar objectives—to reflect when an entity no longer controls the asset or is no longer obligated for the liability—the technical paths to derecognition differ, particularly for financial assets involving transfers, securitizations, and continuing involvement.

Derecognition of financial assets under IFRS requires evaluating both risk transfer and control.

Under IFRS 9, derecognition of a financial asset occurs when either:

• The contractual rights to the cash flows expire, or

• The asset is transferred, and the transfer qualifies for derecognition.

The three-step test for derecognition of transferred financial assets is as follows:

1. Has the entity transferred the rights to receive the cash flows?If not, the asset remains on the books.

2. Has the entity transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership?

   • If yes, derecognize the asset.

   • If no, and risks/rewards are retained, the asset stays on the balance sheet.

   • If neither, proceed to step 3.

3. Has the entity relinquished control over the asset?

   • If yes, derecognize.

   • If no, continue to recognize the asset to the extent of continuing involvement.

This model focuses on substance over form, examining whether the transaction truly transfers economic exposure.

US GAAP uses a legal isolation test and control evaluation for derecognition of assets.

Under ASC 860, derecognition of a financial asset (particularly in transfers) depends on three primary criteria:

Condition	Requirement
Legal isolation	The transferred asset is legally isolated from the transferor (e.g., via a trust)
Transferee rights	The transferee has the right to pledge or exchange the asset
No effective control retained	The transferor does not maintain effective control (e.g., via call options)

This approach is more rules-based than IFRS and focuses strongly on legal form. If all conditions are met, the financial asset is derecognized; otherwise, the transfer is accounted for as a secured borrowing.

Key differences in derecognition of financial assets.

Aspect	IFRS 9	US GAAP (ASC 860)
Derecognition model	Risk and rewards + control test	Legal isolation + control + transferee rights
Transfer of risks and rewards	Central to the analysis	Less emphasized
Legal isolation requirement	Not required	Mandatory for derecognition
Focus	Economic substance	Legal form
Continuing involvement	Results in partial derecognition	Transfer often fails derecognition if control retained
Application to securitizations	More permissive if risks are transferred	Stricter due to legal isolation requirement

IFRS allows partial derecognition when part of the asset is transferred and the transferor retains some exposure. US GAAP generally requires all-or-nothing treatment.

Derecognition of financial liabilities is more straightforward in both frameworks.

For both IFRS and US GAAP, a financial liability is derecognized when it is:

• Extinguished, meaning the obligation is discharged, cancelled, or expires.

Common events triggering derecognition of liabilities:

• Full repayment of debt

• Formal debt forgiveness

• Expiration of legal obligations

• Substantial debt modification (possibly treated as extinguishment)

Under IFRS 9, a substantial modification of terms (e.g., a change in present value of cash flows >10%) is treated as an extinguishment, with derecognition of the original liability and recognition of a new one. The difference is recognized in profit or loss.

Under US GAAP (ASC 470), the test for substantial modification is similar, with some variations in discount rate and calculation of net present value.

Accounting entries for derecognition vary by scenario.

Example 1: Derecognition of a financial asset (IFRS — full transfer of risks and rewards)

Dr. Cash                           500,000  
Dr. Loss on sale of receivables     15,000  
    Cr. Trade receivables                     515,000

Example 2: Derecognition of a financial liability (debt extinguished)

Dr. Notes payable                 100,000  
Dr. Accrued interest                5,000  
    Cr. Cash                                 105,000

Example 3: Partial derecognition with continuing involvement (IFRS)

Dr. Cash                         400,000  
    Cr. Trade receivables (partial)       400,000  
    [Continuing involvement asset remains]

In US GAAP, failed sales are accounted for as secured borrowings, with the asset remaining on the books and a corresponding liability recognized.

Disclosures help users understand transfer structures and derecognition effects.

Both IFRS and US GAAP require comprehensive disclosures for:

• The nature and risks associated with transferred financial assets

• Whether assets have been derecognized or not

• Continuing involvement in derecognized assets (IFRS)

• Secured borrowings from failed sales (US GAAP)

• Securitizations, factoring, and repurchase agreements

IFRS focuses more on risk retention and continuing involvement disclosures, while US GAAP focuses on the legal structure of the transaction and the presence of retained control.

The derecognition rules under IFRS and US GAAP reflect fundamental philosophical differences—IFRS prioritizes risk transfer and control, while US GAAP emphasizes legal isolation and form. Despite aiming for a faithful representation of asset control and liability discharge, the application in structured transactions can lead to significant divergence in outcomes. Accounting professionals must carefully analyze transaction terms, risks retained, and rights transferred to apply the correct treatment.

____________

FOLLOW US FOR MORE.

DATA STUDIOS

datastudios.org