top of page

Loss Limitations and NOL Carryforwards Post-TCJA (IRC § 172 and § 382 limitations)

ree

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act reshaped how corporations utilize net operating losses, tightening annual offset caps, extending carryforward lives, and strengthening ownership-change barriers, so finance teams recalibrate cash-tax forecasts, deferred-tax assets, and M&A modelling.



Section 172 caps NOL deductions to 80 percent of taxable income.

For losses generated after 31 December 2017, corporations may offset only 80 percent of current-year taxable income, leaving the remaining 20 percent subject to the 21-percent rate and carrying any excess forward indefinitely.

Legislation enacted in 2020 temporarily lifted the cap for tax years 2018-2020, but the limitation re-entered in 2021 without an expiry date. Pre-TCJA NOLs retain the prior 20-year carryforward and unlimited 100-percent offset until exhausted, demanding dual-bucket tracking in provision systems. Consolidated groups apply the cap at the group level, yet separate-return-limitation-year (SRLY) rules may confine usage to each member’s contribution.



Section 382 limits loss utilization after ownership changes.

An ownership change occurs when one or more 5-percent shareholders increase their collective stake by more than 50-percentage points within a rolling three-year period. The annual deduction ceiling equals the fair-market value of the loss corporation immediately before the change multiplied by the long-term tax-exempt rate.

If a loss corporation valued at $800 million undergoes an ownership change when the rate is 3 percent, the yearly cap equals $24 million regardless of its NOL pool size. Any unused cap carries forward, but built-in gain or loss items in the five-year recognition period can raise or shrink the ceiling. Anti-stuffer rules disregard value created from capital contributions within two years of the change.



Cumulative-credit approach integrates § 172 and § 382 in the provision model.

Finance teams model taxable-income forecasts, apply the § 382 cap first, allocate 80 percent of the residual to post-TCJA NOLs, then apply pre-TCJA pools, producing a layered schedule that drives deferred-tax-asset recovery patterns.

When forecast taxable income falls below the § 382 limitation, unused capacity carries forward, yet the 80-percent test still applies in future years, compounding deferred-tax recoveries and influencing valuation-allowance assessments under ASC 740.



Journal entry — recording current-year limitation and deferred adjustment.

A corporation with $50 million post-TCJA NOLs and $70 million taxable income applies the 80-percent cap, deducts $56 million, and carries forward $— (fully used), leaving $14 million taxable.

Dr Income Tax Expense $2 940 000

Cr Income Tax Payable $2 940 000


If an ownership change later caps annual utilization at $20 million, the provision reverses previously recognized deferred-tax assets exceeding expected realization.


Dr Valuation Allowance $6 300 000

Cr Income Tax Expense $6 300 000

The adjustment uses a 21-percent rate on the portion unlikely to be used within the forecasting horizon.



Built-in gains and losses modify the § 382 cap during the recognition period.

Unrealized gains realized within five years lift the limitation dollar-for-dollar; unrealized losses cut it, potentially deferring NOL usage indefinitely. Strategic asset dispositions after an ownership change can accelerate cap relief, yet triggering built-in gain taxes may erode cash savings.

Tax departments catalogue Section 197 intangible amortization, unrealized marketable securities gains, and fixed-asset appreciation at the change date to quantify potential uplift.



Section 383 applies similar caps to credit carryforwards, complicating the sequence.

General business credits and minimum-tax credits face the same ownership-change percentage but use a separate limitation based on tax liability, not taxable income, so modeling forecasts tie credit usage to both regular and minimum-tax regimes including BEAT and CAMT.

Excess credits carry forward 20 years; valuation allowances arise when § 383 caps push realization beyond forecast horizons.



Interplay with BEAT, CAMT, and Pillar Two reshapes value of losses.

Disallowed interest under § 163(j) increases taxable income, freeing room for NOL absorption but widening BEAT modified-taxable-income. CAMT computes a separate book-income minimum, so NOL benefits may vanish if book income stays positive. Pillar Two top-up taxes lack a loss carryforward concept, turning local-GAAP losses into stranded attributes that do not shield future domestic top-up taxes.

Finance models therefore track three parallel loss streams: regular tax (§ 172), CAMT loss adjustments, and Pillar Two deferred taxes.



State conformity diverges widely and demands multi-jurisdiction tracking.

Many states decouple from the 80-percent cap, adopt shorter carryforward periods, or conform to § 382 yet substitute their own rates. Separate-return states impose SRLY-style limits across the water’s edge, while unitary states blend losses across affiliates. Provision software must tag each NOL with jurisdiction, vintage, and expected expiry.



Acquisition planning requires pre-change loss preservation strategies.

Loss corporations may sell non-core assets to raise value pre-change, thereby lifting the forthcoming § 382 cap, or spin off profitable units to accelerate loss absorption before the ownership shift. Down-round recapitalizations that depress value ahead of the change reduce the cap, converting NOLs to deferred-tax assets unlikely to be realized.

Buyers often price NOLs at a discount to reflect § 382 leakage, negotiate indemnities for SRLY-restricted pools, and decide whether to trigger a § 338(h)(10) election that steps up basis but sacrifices pre-change NOLs.



Detailed vintage tracking, early ownership-change monitoring, and integrated forecasting across regular tax, CAMT, and Pillar Two remain critical in maintaining the value of NOLs and credit carryforwards after the TCJA regime shift.



____________

FOLLOW US FOR MORE.


DATA STUDIOS


bottom of page