Perplexity: chaining responses for complex, large-scale research projects

Graziano Stefanelli
Aug 27
5 min read

Perplexity’s chaining features turn a single question into a structured research plan, execute steps in parallel, and synthesize results with source-level traceability. This guide explains how to use Multistep, Projects, Collections, source pinning, uploads, and the /v1/chain endpoint to run reliable, repeatable investigations at scale.

Multistep mode plans and executes a research chain automatically.

When you enable Multistep, Perplexity breaks a big goal into sub-questions, runs them in parallel where possible, then merges the findings with deduplicated citations.

What to expect:

Automatic planning. A draft chain is proposed from your prompt, e.g., “map evidence for X across 2019–2025.”
Parallel fetch. Independent sub-queries run concurrently to cut latency.
Structured synthesis. The final answer summarizes consensus, conflicts, and gaps with linked sources.

Setting	Default	Notes
Max sub-queries per run	12	The planner prunes weak branches automatically.
Sub-query context	≤ 8 000 tokens	Long sources are chunked; see token budgeting below.
Daily chain quota	100 000 tokens (Free) / 500 000 (Pro)	Quota applies to the sum of all sub-queries.
Base context window	25 000 tokens (Free) / 50 000 (Paid)	Helps keep earlier steps “alive” during synthesis.

Projects and Collections organize long-running investigations.

Use Projects to group related threads and Collections to cluster sources or results for re-use.

Projects store full conversation history and synthesis outputs.
Collections act like a curated reading list; you can reference one or more during a new chain.

Operational limits:

Up to 200 items per Project.
Source pinning: 15 pins per thread, retained 60 days.
Cache re-use: previously fetched, unchanged sources are billed at ~1 % of their original token cost inside the same Project.

Knowledge upload lets you chain across your own files.

Turn private material into part of the chain by uploading PDF, CSV, or TXT.

Upload capability	Limit	Usage tip
File size	20 MB per file	Split large PDFs by section; keep images only if needed for tables/figures.
Files per Project	100	Use a naming convention: YYYY-domain-topic-vX.pdf.
Chunking	Automatic	Headings and tables are favored as split points.

Perplexity automatically chunks documents and generates retrieval sub-queries that join your files with web sources in the same chain.

The /v1/chain endpoint turns chaining into a programmable workflow.

For apps and pipelines, the /v1/chain endpoint accepts an ordered list of steps, executes them with SSE streaming, and returns intermediate deltas plus a final synthesis.

Request shape (simplified):

{
  "steps": [
    {"id":"q1","type":"search","prompt":"..."},
    {"id":"q2","type":"summarize","depends_on":["q1"],"prompt":"..."},
    {"id":"q3","type":"contrast","depends_on":["q1"],"prompt":"..."}
  ],
  "sources": { "pin": ["url1","url2"] },
  "constraints": { "max_steps": 12, "max_tokens_per_step": 8000 }
}

API limit	Value	Notes
Steps per call	10	Larger workflows: call the API iteratively.
Rate limit	10 calls/min (default)	Higher tiers available on request.
Streaming	SSE	Emits {step_id, delta, citations} events.

Reliable chaining benefits from intentional prompt architecture.

Design a plan, not a paragraph. Use roles, time windows, and deliverable formats so the planner can branch smartly.

Role: “You are a systematic reviewer constrained to peer-reviewed sources.”
Temporal scope: “Focus on Jan 2022–present; flag earlier seminal work separately.”
Deliverable: “Return a matrix summarizing population, methods, outcomes, and confidence.”

Template for Multistep (paste and adapt):

Objective: [what you must decide]
Constraints: [time window, geos, source rules]
Decomposition:
  1) Scope the field [q1]
  2) Extract key claims with methods & samples [q2]
  3) Find contrary evidence [q3]
  4) Synthesize & rate confidence [q4]
Output: 
  - Executive summary (≤ 200 words)
  - Evidence table (CSV)
  - Risk & limitations bullet list

Token budgeting keeps chains fast and affordable.

Think in tokens, not pages. Each sub-query consumes context; a small change in scope can double cost.

Prune duplicates. Prefer a seed set of 5–8 diverse sources, then expand only if novelty falls below a threshold.
Pin sparingly. Pinned sources are great anchors, but too many locks the planner; cap at 5–7 per thread.
Compress early. Ask for structured notes (bullets, JSON) in early steps; save prose for the final synthesis.
Cache wins. Re-run chains inside the same Project to maximize cache hits (≈99 % token savings on unchanged sources).

Patterns that work across research domains.

Literature review pattern.

Seed with 3–5 high-impact reviews.
Branch into sub-fields; cap at 12 sub-queries.
Extract standard fields: population, method, sample size, effect size, caveats.
Synthesize with confidence ratings and open questions.

Competitive landscape scan.

Scope: product class, markets, and time window.
Collect: filings, blog posts, release notes.
Contrast: claims vs. independent tests.
Summarize: feature matrix + pricing bands.

Data-backed briefing.

Ingest your CSV/PDF KPI decks.
Cross-check against public benchmarks.
Explain divergences; propose next-step experiments.

Tables make complex results skimmable.

Suggested synthesis table for Multistep outputs.

Claim	Evidence summary	Top source	Counter-evidence	Confidence (↑/→/↓)
[Concise statement]	[1–2 lines]	[Pinned or best-quality link]	[If any]	[Arrow + short reason]

Operational dashboard for long chains.

Metric	Target	How to improve
Avg steps/run	8–10	Merge overlapping questions; remove dead branches.
Novelty rate	≥ 40 %	Diversify seeds; expand time/geos.
Token/insight	↓	Favor structured notes; compress early.
Re-use ratio	≥ 60 %	Keep work inside one Project; pin stable sources.

Troubleshooting focuses on branching, grounding, and drift control.

Over-branching. Reduce the max steps and demand unique seeds per branch.
Weak grounding. Require direct quotes with citations in early steps; promote those with strongest evidence.
Temporal drift. Add a cut-off date and force fresh sources with after:YYYY-MM-DD in your prompts.
Circular synthesis. Deduplicate by URL domain and penalize repeated claims during the merge step.

A complete example shows the pieces working together.

Goal. “What interventions reduce teacher burnout in urban schools since 2022?”

Chain outline.

q1: Map systematic reviews (2022–present).
q2: Extract intervention types (coaching, scheduling, mental-health).
q3: Find RCTs contradicting top claims.
q4: Summarize with effect sizes and risk of bias.

Deliverables.

Executive summary (≤ 200 words).
Evidence table (CSV with study, method, N, effect, caveats).
Limitations (data quality, external validity, publication bias).

Paste this outline into Multistep, attach your PDFs, and pin 3–4 gold-standard reviews. The result is fast, sourced, and easy to iterate.

Key takeaways for dependable chaining at scale.

Plan with structure. Give roles, scope, and deliverables so the planner branches intelligently.
Exploit re-use. Projects, Collections, pins, and caching reduce cost and stabilize results.
Budget tokens. Keep early steps terse and structured; reserve prose for the final synthesis.
Automate with the API. Use /v1/chain for repeatable research jobs, streaming partials into dashboards or notebooks.

With these practices, you can turn sprawling questions into repeatable, auditable research chains that scale from a single analyst to a full team.

____________

DATA STUDIOS

datastudios.org