Regulatory challenges in cross-border M&A approvals
- Graziano Stefanelli
- Aug 28
- 3 min read
Cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&A) involve navigating complex and often conflicting regulatory regimes across multiple jurisdictions. As governments tighten oversight on foreign investments, particularly in sensitive sectors, securing approval has become one of the most critical and time-consuming aspects of international dealmaking. Successful execution requires anticipating regulatory hurdles, coordinating filings across countries, and structuring transactions to comply with evolving competition, security, and data protection frameworks.
Multi-jurisdictional approvals drive deal timelines and structure.
Large cross-border deals often require clearance from multiple regulatory authorities simultaneously. Each jurisdiction applies its own standards for competition, foreign investment, and national security. Missing a single approval can delay or derail the transaction entirely.
Coordinating approvals in different countries requires close collaboration between legal, financial, and policy teams, as delays in one jurisdiction can affect global closing timelines.
Antitrust reviews scrutinize market concentration and competition.
Competition regulators assess whether a deal will reduce consumer choice or create dominant players. In high-profile transactions, regulators may require concessions before granting approval. Common remedies include:
Divestitures of overlapping business units
Price control commitments to prevent monopolistic behavior
Market access guarantees for smaller competitors
Behavioral remedies, such as limits on exclusive contracting
High-tech, telecom, healthcare, and financial services are frequently targeted for deeper investigation due to their high market concentration and barriers to entry.
National security reviews increasingly influence global M&A.
Governments are placing greater scrutiny on deals involving strategic sectors such as defense, energy, data infrastructure, and advanced technologies. In the U.S., the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) plays a critical role in evaluating foreign acquisitions for potential security risks.
Similar regimes exist globally:
United States (CFIUS) → Reviews inbound foreign investments with security implications
European Union FDI Screening → Coordinates reviews across EU member states
China → Tight restrictions on sensitive technology exports and foreign participation
Australia and Canada → Heightened review of resource and infrastructure acquisitions
Transactions involving semiconductors, cybersecurity, energy grids, and AI capabilities are especially likely to face extended security reviews and potential blocking orders.
Data privacy and localization rules add new regulatory layers.
In recent years, data protection frameworks have become a central focus in cross-border approvals. When deals involve companies handling sensitive consumer or industrial data, regulators assess:
Compliance with GDPR in the EU and other global privacy regimes
Data transfer restrictions and requirements for local storage
Cybersecurity risks and obligations to secure digital infrastructure
Cross-border sharing of intellectual property and algorithms
For technology and financial services transactions, cybersecurity and data sovereignty concerns can become deciding factors in regulatory approvals.
Coordinating strategies reduce execution risk.
Managing regulatory complexity requires a coordinated, multi-stakeholder approach:
Early risk assessments → Map out all required filings before deal announcement
Regulatory engagement → Open channels of communication with authorities early in the process
Flexible structuring → Consider carve-outs, joint ventures, or minority stakes to navigate sensitive jurisdictions
Scenario modeling → Plan for conditional approvals, delayed clearances, and potential remedies
Advisors often develop parallel approval strategies, ensuring that antitrust, foreign investment, and data security reviews progress together to avoid prolonged execution risk.
High-profile deals illustrate growing regulatory intervention.
Recent cases highlight the global shift toward tighter cross-border scrutiny:
NVIDIA’s attempted acquisition of Arm Holdings (2022) → Blocked due to antitrust and national security concerns in multiple jurisdictions.
Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision Blizzard (2023) → Faced simultaneous reviews by U.S., U.K., and EU regulators over gaming market competition.
Broadcom’s acquisition of VMware (2023) → Required divestitures and extended engagement with regulators in multiple countries.
These examples demonstrate how governments now use cross-border approvals to protect domestic competitiveness, national security, and data sovereignty.
Regulatory strategy defines cross-border deal success.
In today’s environment, regulatory approvals are no longer a procedural step—they are a core strategic component of cross-border M&A planning. Companies must anticipate antitrust, security, and data compliance challenges early, coordinate multi-country filings, and remain flexible on structure to secure timely clearances.
The rising complexity of global oversight makes regulatory strategy as critical as deal financing and valuation, shaping outcomes for the world’s largest and most transformative transactions.
____________
FOLLOW US FOR MORE.
DATA STUDIOS
