top of page

Structuring management equity rollovers in leveraged buyouts

ree

In leveraged buyouts (LBOs), management equity rollovers allow senior executives and key employees of the target company to retain a portion of their ownership by reinvesting alongside the acquiring private equity (PE) sponsor. These structures align incentives between management and investors, ensuring leadership remains committed to driving performance and achieving the growth and profitability targets underpinning the deal’s valuation. Properly structuring equity rollovers is critical for balancing risk-sharing, governance rights, and exit participation.



The strategic role of management equity rollovers in LBOs.

Management rollovers serve as a powerful tool to:

  • Align incentives → Executives benefit directly from value creation alongside the PE sponsor.

  • Retain key leadership → Encourages continuity during the integration and operational improvement phases.

  • Optimize deal economics → Reduces the acquirer’s upfront cash requirement while maintaining management commitment.

  • Enhance exit outcomes → Management participates in capital appreciation at exit, improving overall returns.

In competitive auctions, PE sponsors often highlight rollover-friendly structures to differentiate bids and attract management support.



Typical structures for management equity rollovers.

Rollover equity is designed based on ownership objectives, company size, and investor preferences:

Structure

Mechanism

Best Use Case

Direct rollover

Management converts a portion of its existing shares into equity in the new holding company

Most common for mid-market buyouts

Cash reinvestment

Executives receive partial liquidity and reinvest proceeds into the acquirer’s equity

Useful when leaders seek partial monetization

Phantom equity

Grants synthetic shares tied to company performance without direct ownership

Preferred for non-U.S. structures or tax-sensitive jurisdictions

Option-based participation

Management receives call options to purchase equity in the holding company

Used to incentivize early-stage or turnaround situations

Sponsors tailor these models to optimize after-tax benefits and balance short-term liquidity with long-term incentives.


Determining rollover participation levels.

Rollover percentages vary based on deal dynamics, investor expectations, and management’s willingness to share risk:

  • Typical ranges → Management contributions generally fall between 5% and 20% of the total equity capitalization.

  • Risk-sharing balance → Lower contributions may weaken alignment, while excessive rollovers could overexpose executives financially.

  • Differentiated structures → Senior executives often receive larger rollover allocations than broader employee groups.

The allocation process must account for role-critical personnel and the company’s overall leadership strategy.


Governance rights and investor protections.

Management equity rollovers often involve negotiation of governance rights to ensure management’s interests are adequately protected:

  • Board representation → Senior executives may secure voting seats or observer rights on the holding company’s board.

  • Protective provisions → Management can negotiate veto rights over major strategic decisions, including future financing or exit timing.

  • Tag-along rights → Ensure management can participate proportionally in liquidity events.

  • Drag-along obligations → Management commits to selling its stake if the majority approves an exit, ensuring deal certainty.

Balancing investor control with management influence fosters alignment while maintaining operational flexibility.


Tax considerations in structuring rollovers.

Tax treatment significantly affects how management equity rollovers are structured:

  • Tax deferral opportunities → In some jurisdictions, rolling equity into the new holding company may defer recognition of taxable gains.

  • Preferred entity structures → Using partnerships or pass-through entities can optimize after-tax distributions.

  • Cross-border complexities → Deals involving multinational management teams require coordination across multiple tax regimes.

Early tax planning ensures participants maximize net-of-tax returns while maintaining compliance with local regulations.


Integration with incentive compensation plans.

Management equity rollovers often work alongside long-term incentive programs (LTIPs) to enhance alignment:

  • Performance-based equity grants → Additional shares awarded when EBITDA, revenue, or strategic targets are achieved.

  • Retention bonuses → Cash incentives designed to secure executive commitment during the hold period.

  • Exit-linked payouts → Special incentives paid upon achieving target internal rates of return (IRRs) at exit.

These layered incentive structures create a balanced framework for retaining leadership while rewarding superior performance.


Examples of management equity rollovers in practice.

  • Silver Lake’s acquisition of Dell Technologies (2013) → Founder Michael Dell rolled over a significant equity stake, ensuring long-term alignment with sponsors.

  • Blackstone’s acquisition of Ancestry.com (2020) → Management retained partial ownership, incentivizing continued platform growth post-acquisition.

  • KKR’s take-private of Envision Healthcare (2018) → Structured equity rollovers with performance-linked upside tied to operational turnarounds.

These transactions illustrate how rollovers drive collaboration between management teams and sponsors in maximizing value creation.



Management equity rollovers align leadership with investor outcomes.

In LBOs, management rollovers create shared ownership and accountability, ensuring executives are financially invested in achieving operational improvements and long-term growth. When structured effectively—with clear governance rights, optimized tax treatment, and integrated incentive programs—rollovers enhance deal success, exit valuations, and stakeholder alignment.

As competition for premium assets intensifies, well-designed rollover structures are becoming a key differentiator in winning bids and securing management commitment in leveraged buyouts.


____________

FOLLOW US FOR MORE.


DATA STUDIOS


bottom of page