Taxation of Corporate Inversions and Anti-Inversion Rules

Graziano Stefanelli
Aug 2
3 min read

U.S. tax law penalizes transactions where domestic corporations restructure under foreign parents to reduce their tax burden. Anti-inversion rules under IRC § 7874 impose restrictions, disallow benefits, and in some cases treat the new foreign parent as a U.S. entity for tax purposes.

A corporate inversion occurs when a U.S. corporation becomes a subsidiary of a foreign entity.

The basic structure involves a U.S. parent merging with or into a smaller foreign company, placing the combined group under foreign ownership—often in a jurisdiction with a lower corporate tax rate.

For example, a U.S. medical device manufacturer may merge with an Irish affiliate and shift headquarters to Dublin, while retaining substantial business operations in the United States. If this structure meets inversion thresholds, tax consequences follow automatically.

Section 7874 classifies inversions based on ownership tests.

If at least 60 percent of the new foreign parent’s stock is held by former U.S. shareholders, the foreign entity is treated as a “surrogate foreign corporation,” triggering adverse tax effects. If the ownership exceeds 80 percent, the new foreign parent is treated as a U.S. corporation for all federal tax purposes.

Consequences by ownership level:

60%–80%: Loss of certain tax attributes, disallowance of tax-deferred treatment for some transactions, and denial of use of foreign tax credits or net operating losses against gain from asset transfers.
Over 80%: Complete denial of foreign status—entity taxed as a U.S. corporation.

These thresholds are calculated based on the fair market value of shares issued in exchange for U.S. shareholder interests.

Substantial business activity test offers narrow exceptions.

A transaction may escape anti-inversion rules if the foreign parent has substantial business activities in the country of incorporation. The IRS uses a narrow test: at least 25 percent of group employees, assets, and income must be located in the foreign jurisdiction.

Few companies qualify. Even if the foreign partner is publicly traded and contributes significant global assets, the test requires specific operational footprints—often disqualifying IP-holding companies or regional holding structures.

Inverted groups face long-term limitations under § 7874 and related provisions.

Even if not fully recharacterized as U.S. corporations, inverted groups may face:

Limits on use of U.S. tax attributes
Denial of § 367(a) nonrecognition treatment for outbound transfers
Additional disclosure requirements on Form 8838-P and Form 5471
Loss of treaty benefits under limitation-on-benefits (LOB) clauses

Moreover, under § 4985, a 15 percent excise tax may apply to stock compensation received by insiders during inversion-related restructurings.

Illustrative inversion structure and tax impact.

U.S. Corporation A merges with Foreign Corporation B (smaller, incorporated in a low-tax country). The combined group is now legally headquartered overseas. If 82 percent of the new parent’s shareholders were former U.S. shareholders, § 7874 fully applies, and the new parent is treated as U.S. for tax purposes.

Resulting effect:

Ongoing U.S. taxation of global income
Inability to avoid Subpart F or GILTI
No reduction in effective U.S. rate

Had the ownership stayed at 75%, the group would not be reclassified as a U.S. taxpayer, but adverse rules would still block use of attributes and defer inbound asset step-ups.

Anti-inversion regulations tighten further through transaction disaggregation and multi-step scrutiny.

Treasury regulations prevent taxpayers from circumventing thresholds through multi-step transactions or asset “stuffing.” These include:

Ignoring foreign acquisitions occurring within 36 months of inversion
Disregarding stock issued in exchange for passive assets
Aggregating serial acquisitions to reach the 60% or 80% threshold
Requiring inclusion of certain deemed transactions involving partnerships or disregarded entities

This forces companies to model long-term capital structure and evaluate the U.S. shareholder continuity not only at close, but for trailing periods.

Financial reporting requires deferred tax provisioning and uncertain tax position disclosures.

ASC 740 requires provision for U.S. taxes if an inversion is expected to trigger full U.S. tax treatment. Uncertain positions under ASC 740‑10 (formerly FIN 48) must reflect IRS scrutiny risk on past inversions and on post-inversion asset transfers.

Many inverted groups also face exposure under BEAT and CAMT, depending on the size of U.S. deductions and intercompany structures that remain after inversion.

Legislative proposals may tighten inversion definitions further.

Ongoing proposals in Congress seek to lower the ownership threshold from 80% to 50%, expand the substantial business activity test, or impose immediate exit taxes on inversions. Proposed changes may also affect treaty eligibility and deny deductions for payments to inverted affiliates.

Tax departments should track the legislative outlook and prepare for post-2025 transition rules that could affect existing structures.

Inversion planning demands detailed ownership modelling, treaty review, and sensitivity analysis of long-term tax consequences across Subpart F, GILTI, BEAT, and § 7874 exposure.

____________

DATA STUDIOS

datastudios.org

U.S. tax law penalizes transactions where domestic corporations restructure under foreign parents to reduce their tax burden. Anti-inversion rules under IRC § 7874 impose restrictions, disallow benefits, and in some cases treat the new foreign parent as a U.S. entity for tax purposes.