Use of synthetic equity instruments to align incentives in acquisitions
- Graziano Stefanelli
- Sep 3
- 3 min read
In mergers and acquisitions (M&A), companies increasingly rely on synthetic equity instruments to align management and employee incentives without granting direct ownership stakes. These structures mimic the economic benefits of equity participation—such as capital appreciation and profit-sharing—while avoiding shareholder dilution, complex voting structures, or regulatory complications. Synthetic equity is especially prevalent in private equity-backed acquisitions, cross-border deals, and situations involving minority shareholders, where balancing flexibility, control, and tax efficiency is critical.
Why synthetic equity is used in acquisition structures.
Synthetic equity bridges gaps between buyers and management teams by providing equity-like economics without transferring ownership. Its key advantages include:
Aligning incentives → Rewards executives based on company performance and value creation.
Avoiding shareholder dilution → Investors retain control while granting management upside participation.
Simplifying governance → Eliminates the need for complex shareholder voting rights or legal ownership transfers.
Enhancing tax flexibility → Structures can be customized to minimize adverse tax consequences for participants and companies.
This makes synthetic equity particularly attractive for deals involving highly leveraged buyouts, family-owned businesses, or cross-border integrations where ownership structures must remain stable.
Common types of synthetic equity instruments.
Synthetic equity takes several forms depending on transaction goals and jurisdictional considerations:
By tailoring these instruments to deal objectives, buyers incentivize management teams while maintaining tight control over ownership structures.
Role of synthetic equity in M&A incentive frameworks.
Synthetic equity often forms part of broader long-term incentive plans (LTIPs) designed to retain talent and maximize post-acquisition performance:
Retention incentives → Payments vest over multi-year periods to secure continuity in leadership.
Performance alignment → Rewards tied to achieving financial targets, synergy milestones, or integration objectives.
Exit-driven payouts → Executives benefit directly upon sale, recapitalization, or IPO of the portfolio company.
Blended structures → Synthetic equity is often combined with cash bonuses or true equity grants to balance liquidity and upside participation.
Integrating synthetic equity into LTIPs ensures management remains engaged throughout the investment lifecycle.
Tax and accounting considerations in structuring synthetic equity.
Because synthetic equity often involves cash-settled payouts rather than true share transfers, tax and reporting treatment differs from standard equity programs:
Tax deferral opportunities → Payouts are generally taxed upon settlement rather than grant, offering timing advantages.
Company deductibility → Cash payments linked to synthetic equity are typically deductible for the company, improving after-tax economics.
Cross-border structuring → Jurisdictional mismatches require coordination to avoid double taxation or compliance gaps.
Financial reporting impact → Phantom stock and SARs are usually recorded as liabilities, with mark-to-market adjustments for fair value.
Tax planning is critical to maximize participant benefits and ensure compliance across multi-jurisdictional acquisitions.
Strategic benefits compared to true equity grants.
Synthetic equity offers several advantages relative to issuing real ownership:
Preserves ownership control → Sponsors and founders maintain voting power.
Simplifies shareholder management → Avoids onboarding employees or executives as formal equity holders.
Minimizes dilution → Protects existing investor returns in highly leveraged capital structures.
Enhances confidentiality → Transaction-sensitive details are shielded from broader shareholder disclosures.
However, because synthetic equity does not confer actual ownership, it may require careful communication strategies to ensure management buy-in and motivation.
Examples of synthetic equity usage in acquisitions.
Private equity take-privates → Sponsors often implement phantom stock plans to incentivize leadership without altering equity cap tables.
Family-owned business transitions → Founders use synthetic awards to retain key executives without diluting family ownership.
Cross-border joint ventures → SAR-based structures are deployed when regulatory regimes restrict foreign equity ownership.
These examples demonstrate how synthetic equity provides flexibility and control while ensuring executives share in the value created through the transaction.
Synthetic equity instruments enhance alignment without altering ownership.
In acquisitions where maintaining ownership stability is critical but management participation is essential, synthetic equity offers a customizable and tax-efficient solution. By replicating the economic benefits of equity while avoiding governance and dilution complexities, synthetic structures ensure management incentives remain tightly aligned with investor objectives.
As M&A activity grows more complex and capital structures become layered, synthetic equity is becoming a core element of incentive planning in private equity and strategic acquisitions alike.
____________
FOLLOW US FOR MORE.
DATA STUDIOS
